WHAT ABOUT SUSPECT TESTING?
Doubles, being an official tier, does have its own suspect testing system. We have a semipermanent council of top battlers who periodically decide on suspects, with user input, and then ladder and activity requirements for a vote. As of now the council is
Laga, Stratos, BLOOD TOTEM, kamikaze17, KyleCole, shaian, Memoric, and Bughouse and you can contact the tier's co-leaders
Arcticblast and
Mizuhime if you have any questions about the process. Stay tuned for the next suspect testing thread, too!
WHAT'S NEXT?
I have questions this doesn't address.
What the purpose of suspecting and banning? Is it to prevent over powered pokemon, with few checks and counters, being thrown onto seeming every other team, which make the meta game stale, unoriginal, and un-fun?
If so should we consider banning certain 3 pokemon cores for the same reason? If not why?
Before you pick the easy, small minded answer and say there are checks to every core, the same goes to the pokemon we ban. (ever heard of an ice move?)(btw, on a side note keldeo+skymin is ban worthy but not skymin on its own, imo)
It has never been done by another meta and the only meta that would make since to try is doubles for obvious reasons.
Hypothetically if the core of Lando-T, Thundy, and mega-Kang got suspected and banned. (I believe this core is the most overpowering)
Ignoring you reasons for wanting to try or not wanting to try this idea; would the effect be bad to our meta or beneficial? And why? And does your answer conflict with suspecting individual pokemon?
Imo banning some 3 (even 2) pokemon cores would in the short run see a lot of new teams being built and in the long run a healthier meta where you would see a lot less match ups where 5 of 6 pokemon are the same.
Additionally in the short run our community would become more active with suspecting. And we might even gain more active players from doing that suspecting .