I'm not entirely sure. I've been going to church, but it's hard to decide. I guess I'm a Christian.
Wrong...practical atheism is defined as "disregard of God, godlessness in life or conduct. This doesn't imply that I am a Deist. I just never saw the purpose of having faith in God although I knew that there is God.
I agree with made up for people, i think its just there so humans have some sort of "GOAL" by the end of their lives.Ive always thought that Religion was just mad eup by man to make people feel better about lfie.
In relaity, I find it more comforting that everyone is not created for a purpose and thatt we have no control over anything, really.
IMO the worst argument you could possibly make is the whole "the universe is too complex for it to have come about on its own." This implies that there is some sort of objective "level of complexity" scale that you are ranking the universe on, when in fact you are only ranking the complexity of the universe compared to your subjective view of "complexity" based on everything you've seen and learned. Who are we to decide what is a reasonable level of complexity? For all we know, the universe could have been 100000x more complex. The fact that it looks complex to us is because... we are us.
If you'll end up in heaven or hell anyway, why does it matter?
So, I'm curious. How did any of you decide or settle on your specific brand of religion whether it's Judaism, Islam, Hindu, Mormonism, Protestantism, Ba'ha faith.... the list goes on.
I mean, all these different faiths, sects, variations on context seem to all have about the same amount of evidence, none at all.
There does not seem to be any documented supernatural occurrences of religious intervention barring bibles, mythology and fantasy. You're simply told to "have faith" by people that you trust, who were told by people that they trust.
I'm not trying to take a pot shot at any of you religious folks, I'm simply just curious as to why you all seem to place so much stock in your faith, using it to fight wars, base laws on etc.
Homosexuality isn't illegal in most developed countries, as far as I'm aware, but yes, homosexuality would be socially acceptable if it weren't for Christianity. Christians were essentially the only ones to campaign against it in California's Prop 8, which is proof as far as I'm concerned that only Christians care about it.If the majority of whatever nation you belong to wasn't Christian wouldn't homosexuality be legal? Without christianity wouldn't evolution simply be accepted or challenged using the scientific method only and not just by the argument "organisms are too complex to create themselves".
No, as I see it this is a completely valid point. If God supplied the points in the Bible, why is he wrong? Either readers have misinterpreted the Bible, misunderstood natural phenomena and wrongly asserted the earth is older than 6000 years old, or something was lost in translation to English. As you and I see it, Christians must go along with one of the three options.The bible says that the Earth is 6000 years old, and if you don't believe that you don't believe in the bible. Why do people say that they're Christian if they don't believe every single word written in their book? I mean, I can see the moral obligations to believe in God, and most of the stuff in the bible, but if that same religion also says something else, you either believe that too, or you're not really of that religion. (I know I'm going to get called out on this, so if I'm misinformed please inform me here.)
Why do I have to believe in God to know that it is wrong to kill someone? Why are the only people with real morals people with religion, as Deck Knight has been asserting. (I have the utmost respect for you Deck Knight, and I agree with you mostly in cong topics, but not right now). He also said something about how religious orginizations are the ones that are donating and volunteering and being stand-up and altruistic etc. I see how religion would motivate you to do good things, and be a good person, but why are people without religion unable to be this caring? And couldn't one argue that they are only doing that to pass the test of being a good person on Earth to get into heaven?
Anyway, my point of not currently having a religion (at least not being Christian), is not the lack of proof of God, but that in Juedo-Christianity, our existence is just a test to pass to get into heaven. This is just a test, and when you think about it, doesn't really mean anything. People find meaning in Christianity, but I see the exact opposite. If you'll end up in heaven or hell anyway, why does it matter? If there is no heaven or hell, then what you do in your life seems to matter more, because that is all that there is for you. This is true, at least for me personally, which is my answer to the question of this topic.
Main points: You don't need to be religious to be moral, and I personally see more meaning in life without the afterlife.
See my first response to Khyl; but your argument is quite valid. Imperfect people wrote the Bible and translated it several times, so the final product is by no means perfect.I'm not a Christian, but I see adherance to the teachings of Jesus Christ more important than adherance to the Bible. The Bible was written by people who weren't Jesus, so while it is an important document to Christianity parts of it can be taken with a little grain of salt. Though not all Christians would agree with that, that's how I see it.
I'm an atheist, I have been for years. Mainly for the reasons stated in this thread - just no reason to believe in a particular god.
But most Christians teach (from what I know) that anyone can get into heaven through faith or love or something, so the point is moot.
I'm pretty sure it is in the bible and the teachings of Jesus that the only way to avoid hell is to be a christain, and this is what pretty much every christian I know believesBut most Christians teach (from what I know) that anyone can get into heaven through faith or love or something, so the point is moot.
I'm pretty sure it is in the bible and the teachings of Jesus that the only way to avoid hell is to be a christain, and this is what pretty much every christian I know believes
My religious background is rooted in science, and oddly enough, science convinced me that not EVERYTHING can be explained though science and that there is/was some sort of god. I am not able to accept that time never began, that time is an illusion. Some sort of higher power started existence; however, I make no claim that this higher power did anything more to push us onward.
I believe in free will, I believe that there is some sort of soul, that we are more than a culmination of chemicals. I believe that there MIGHT be an afterlife. One much unlike a Christian one, I see heaven being no better than hell. Their heaven is either eternal or terminal, neither of which can truly be happy. The afterlife would simply that, the life after this one. And how well we live this one has little bearing on that one.
Hmph...upstarts. This is the original and true computing religion
One could postulate that the brain acts to 'connect' the soul to the body, and thus consider brain damage as affecting that connection. Not saying I or anyone else believes this, but it is one way (probably not wholly satisfactory it's true) to reconcile the hypothesis of a soul with the known effects of brain damage.If the soul exists, then whatever its function is, brain damage should not hinder it.
Tl;dr, Christianity is Stockholm Syndrome?
But the point is still there that anyone can get into heaven, so it makes no sense to say it's out of your control.
And I'm not convinced Jesus actually said that.