Approved by the OU Council
art by Ninja-Jamal
ITT we will convince the OU Council whether to suspect test Keldeo or not. Yes, many of us have already assumed that Keldeo would be an auto-suspect by presenting our thoughts about Keldeo elsewhere, but this is the official thread that the OU Council will review to determine Keldeo's suspect-worthiness.
Some people believe that Keldeo with Pursuit / Gothitelle / Rain support is too much for the metagame to handle. Others say that Keldeo has sufficient number of solid checks and even workable counters to impair Keldeo's performance in OU.
Keldeo is quite resilient to priority moves and resists SR, making it somewhat harder to remove than Landorus, the previous suspect. However, unlike Landorus it lacks U-turn (and immunity to Spikes), making it much riskier for Keldeo users to switch out of Keldeo's checks and counters without being forced on the defensive.
Regardless of which side you stand on, it's your duty to expand upon these pre-existing arguments or introduce new ones to the table. Sway the OU Council's with solid evidence and reasoning.
RULES (taken directly from kd24's Landorus-I Discussion Thread)
- Keldeo is not a suspect at this time. You either make a case or refute the points of the other side. That's it. If I find your post incoherent to the topic at hand, it will be deleted.
- If you're on the suspect side, your job should be first and foremost to convince the council it should be a suspect. The onus is on you and your posts need to reflect that. If you don't take time to think about what you're saying, then I won't waste time in deleting posts that serve no purpose.
- This goes without saying, but I'm going to say it anyway. This thread is not a cesspool for flaming, trolling, or non-serious posts. If you're going to act like that and you want council to consider Keldeo as a suspect, good luck. No better way to drive a wedge between you and the council than by shitting up a thread.
After 3-4 days of productive discussion, I may put up a public poll so the OU Council can gauge the community's overall stance about this matter.

art by Ninja-Jamal
ITT we will convince the OU Council whether to suspect test Keldeo or not. Yes, many of us have already assumed that Keldeo would be an auto-suspect by presenting our thoughts about Keldeo elsewhere, but this is the official thread that the OU Council will review to determine Keldeo's suspect-worthiness.
Some people believe that Keldeo with Pursuit / Gothitelle / Rain support is too much for the metagame to handle. Others say that Keldeo has sufficient number of solid checks and even workable counters to impair Keldeo's performance in OU.
Keldeo is quite resilient to priority moves and resists SR, making it somewhat harder to remove than Landorus, the previous suspect. However, unlike Landorus it lacks U-turn (and immunity to Spikes), making it much riskier for Keldeo users to switch out of Keldeo's checks and counters without being forced on the defensive.
Regardless of which side you stand on, it's your duty to expand upon these pre-existing arguments or introduce new ones to the table. Sway the OU Council's with solid evidence and reasoning.
RULES (taken directly from kd24's Landorus-I Discussion Thread)
- Keldeo is not a suspect at this time. You either make a case or refute the points of the other side. That's it. If I find your post incoherent to the topic at hand, it will be deleted.
- If you're on the suspect side, your job should be first and foremost to convince the council it should be a suspect. The onus is on you and your posts need to reflect that. If you don't take time to think about what you're saying, then I won't waste time in deleting posts that serve no purpose.
- This goes without saying, but I'm going to say it anyway. This thread is not a cesspool for flaming, trolling, or non-serious posts. If you're going to act like that and you want council to consider Keldeo as a suspect, good luck. No better way to drive a wedge between you and the council than by shitting up a thread.
After 3-4 days of productive discussion, I may put up a public poll so the OU Council can gauge the community's overall stance about this matter.