wanna congratulate the deal-sphealer on an excellently aimed shot
scum points, commenting on the night results in a positive is a classic scum move
reading back on walrein his suspicions were largely targeted at knights, and moodycloud (altho moody seemed to be dependant on haruno flipping scum which didnt occur)
knights felt oppurtunistic on haruno wagon
what do people feel about knights + king as a scum duo
entirely plausible
it is not restricted roleblocker. we are therefore using 7.
lynch king
now if you cuckolds would listen this can be roped. haruno is lynchbait and I'm glad whatever townies were on that wagon fell for it like they do every game.
happy to start with this
Lynch King
reminder that majority is now in effect and with 14 is takes 8 to lynch
knights leet king are the lynchpool today btw
agree
want to look into paper/pancake more too
Vote history says that Jalmont, Knights and King all voted Haruno in posts #520 to #530 aka really close. I'd be surprised if they were all scum because that'd be really obvious from them at this point, but I was wrong about Jalmont so it's a possibility.
I think I'd lynch Knights and from his flip either decide that the two wagons were TvT or that the scum team pushed the counterwagon to Ullar which is a reckless thing to do d1 imo and would implicate Ullar. In the narrative where both wagons were mislynches I'd look at the people not wanting anything to do with the Haruno mislynch (in which case Texas/DLE's late flip onto Haruno would not be a move scum would want to make) aka Ullar wagon+other wagons+the guy who didnt vote.
In any case I think lynching among these :
KnightsofCydonia, King_, Da Letter El, Ullar, Texas Cloverleaf
Knights being my top suspect, or from people who didnt appear to give a fuck about the wagons Paperblade being my top suspect among those,would help settle the matter of Ullar's alignment.
Former Hope Why did you not vote?
in case its not explicitly clear, i stated multiple times throughout the day that i would be present and willing to change my vote to ensure it did not remain tied, at 15 minutes to deadline the vote was tied 6-6 so i unvoted my preferred lynch in ullar and made it 7-5 haruno so that neither could stealth unlynch to re-tie it. doing it at 15 mins to meant i left time for walrein or asek to post in case there were any changes of mind. its disingenuous to say that i "flipped" when it was done clearly and expressly to prevent a tied vote scenario
why are DLE and I in your "willing to lynch pool" yet your top suspect in paperblade among that category is not?
Votecount
Haruno (7): Walrein, Jalmont, KnightsofCydonia, King_, Da Letter El, Ullar, Texas Cloverleaf
Ullar (5): Hawkie, Blazade, Asek, Moodycloud, Haruno
Asek (1): Shubaka
King_ (1): Paperblade
Hitmonleet (1): Josh
Josh (1): Hitmonleet
Not Voting (1): Former Hope
Based on the final vote I expect at least one scum on each of the three wagons
One in {
Walrein,
Jalmont, KnightsofCydonia, King_, Da Letter El, Ullar, Texas Cloverleaf}
One in {Hawkie, Blazade, Asek, Moodycloud,
Haruno}
One in {Shubaka, Paperblade/Pancake, Josh, Hitmonleet, Former Hope}
And the fourth scum floating somewhere among the morass. Means little for today but keep note for future associations.
Excuse#1+Promise
set up spec, but i don't see why town would ask this? from me it makes more sense coming from scum who want to know whether the town PR's know which scum PR's are in the game, imo
literally Excuse#2 but doesn't bother to promise further activity
this is just commentary + probably preparing an SR on an easy target(King) for later in the game(notice he tried to push me early D1 as well?)
that's nice.
i'm sorry but after looking at former's posts in more detail i literally CANNOT leave him alone he's doing the bare minimum in order to scrape by and when he does post 30% is an excuse 60% of filler and 10% is worth reading.
Lynch Former Hope
Agreeing that his posts have been bad, a lot of day 1 people were saying things like how they always scum read FH's style, what makes you look here vs (king, knights, leet)?
Since everyone is ISOing, I think I'm going to iso Josh this afternoon when I have free time, since nobody gets what I'm trying to point out.
I'm open to any questions anyone has or thoughts, if anyone wants to ask me things.
Also, why is Texas talking about me reading the thread when I'm set to invis for that?
Apparently not, there was a definite point after you were tagged when you were seen viewing the thread and not posting