Sports NBA Thread 2025-2026

[DerrickRose]

I'm a spurs fan.

They aint beating the thunder in the playoffs. No way. Denver has the best chance.

Thunder has had a very easy schedule but they've accumulated history breaking defensive stats unseen as well as being on pace for the best regular season ever. So the parity argument kinda falls short there. They show more signs repeating than some of the past repeats.

 

[adjectivenoun]

The Pistons will have exactly the same season they had last year. That's my prediction.

Every single fucking time.

 

[Coronis]

I’ve kinda fallen out of NBA recently. But yay Curry brothers finally together. Too bad it wasn’t during Steph’s prime.

 

[DerrickRose]

The Thunder have a positive net rating overall with SGA off the floor.

No more "is OKC really a favorite to repeat?" Questions. The potential first dynasty since the Warriors is here.

As for the Spurs: this stretch without Wemby couldn't have gone any better. The young guns get experience with Fox against top teams. They learn to play without Wemby by driving and shooting with pace. Now Wemby can see where he fits and any cup experience for this young group at this point win or lose is icing on the cake.

 

[bdt2002]

The Thunder have a positive net rating overall with SGA off the floor.

No more "is OKC really a favorite to repeat?" Questions. The potential first dynasty since the Warriors is here.

Get a load of this, gang. It has come to my attention are actually some people on the Internet, especially on NBA TikTok of all places that think this Thunder team could actually win a hypothetical playoff series against the Warriors in their prime. Let me say that again. NBA TikTok, a place that already contains some of the objectively worst takes I have ever heard, actually thinks the Thunder stands a chance against the Warriors’ throne.

To the uneducated eye, I can see why someone might think this. The 2017 Warriors and the 2025 Thunder are the two teams and their respective seasons being compared here, right, and while I can’t exactly tell if they were talking about out 2024-25 or 2025-26 (the NBA Finals recognizes the second number as the calendar year for the season, so that’s what I tend to do too), my opinion on this is pretty much the same regardless. This Thunder team has been I credit efficient to the point where they even caught me by surprise, posting some of the best net efficiency ratings we’ve seen since the Warriors dynasty and noticeably better defensive performances and consistency than basically the entire league. The problems I have are twofold. For starters, at least so far, I would argue the Warriors in their prime had better coaching and a deeper list of role players than Oklahoma City currently does. Maybe that changes later down the line, but with what we have to work with currently, the Thunder, while dominant, haven’t exactly changed the narrative of the sport and redefined the league as much as the Warriors were able to do. I’m also going to suggest a take of my own and say that the Warriors would actually match up pretty well against this Thunder team head-to-head, since part of what made the Warriors so dangerous for so long was their ability to control the pace of the court and extend their offense simultaneously, forcing teams to play Golden State’s game rather than their own like it’s some kind of Smogon suspect test. As good as Oklahoma City has looked, it’s hard to say they’ve faced that kind of adversity at this early point in their championship window, at least not yet.

 

[phoopes]

My response to this is that the Thunder were 18-1 through 19 games with the highest point differential in NBA history (through 19 games) at a 16.5ppg victory margin. This was without Jalen Williams, who was third team All-NBA last year and a key piece of the championship team. The Thunder are now 20-1, the last two games being close ones, but as they reintegrate Williams into the lineup they’re going to be a better team than the one that set the record for ppg differential through 19 games. That’s scary. I wouldn’t put money on them to hit 73 wins quite yet, but I wouldn’t be surprised if they matched or exceeded last year’s total of 68.

Their biggest competition is in the West for sure. It’s not a cakewalk by any means and you’re right, the playoffs are a different animal. But this team now has playoff experience in addition to their regular season success. They know what it takes to grind out wins and achieve the ultimate goal. I think once they get over the hump in the WCF it should be a given that they’re beating anyone coming out of a relatively weak East.

The Thunder have the reigning MVP and while he’s not the best player in the league (still think it’s Jokic), Shai is a superstar that can and will lead the way. I said don’t put your money on them breaking the win record, but I would take them over the field when it comes to a championship. Like I said preseason, we have a dynasty in the making here and I don’t think that’s an overreaction.

So the dynasty in the making talk may have been a wee bit premature when they’re 0-3 against the Spurs this year lol. I still think they’re favorites to win the championship but Wemby is also going to be a force for years so who knows whether the Thunder will be able to get over that massive hump (a 7’5” hump to be specific)

 

[DerrickRose]

Firstly, have the OKC redefined the NBA like the Warriors? The question is a bit loaded considering we're one season after their first championship. Arguably, they have created some trends already around the league. Depth is more emphasized in rosters with athletic wings and guards, and full-court pressure on ball-handlers. Whether this becomes a long-term thing remains to be seen, but OKC in my eyes has been a dynasty in the making since the SGA trade. I feel like they've just been under the radar until now. Their dominance does not surprise me at all as Sam Presti carried the Spurs way of organizing around disciplined, smart scouting and team basketball. Draft after draft, grabbing Chris Paul for a year, stocking assets and developing picks at the same time. Spurs did the same thing around Wemby, so the trend is less due to OKC but rather they followed the "dynasty" pathway for years already.

Spurs have done well these past few weeks to beat them 3-0. Our wing size and speed so far is a bit of a mismatch. It doesn't mean OKC still isn't a likely dynasty: they have the best assets in the league, best young talent, and best superstar. Wemby could definitely prevent that and hey, that's totally probable. We also don't know the asset and future market of the league which is just as much of a factor deciding team strength and versatility.

However, losing 0-3 to the Spurs isn't the worst outcome for a contender during this run:

Since November 16th, Spurs are:

- 15-3 (best record)
- 120.3 Offensive efficiency (4th)
- 112.3 Defensive rating (10th), 102.6 Since Wemby's return (2nd)
- 8.0 Net rating (3rd)
- 37.2 3-point % (7th)
- 0.281 Free-throw rate (7th)
- 51% Rebound Rate (8th)
- 59.8 True Shooting % (6th)