...You can't be serious, Alomomola's base 75 Attack stat and Munchlax's 85 base Attack are considered setup material, and you consider base 69 great for a wall? Keep in mind that isn't too far off from Bastiodon's 52 base Attack and Wartortle's 65 base SpAtk, the former which can make up with stronger STAB in Stone Edge or w/e (not that you'd try).
Really, I could redirect you to this post and call it a day, but this time there's even more to talk about. Wormadam-T's greatest niche in the day was to resist Psychic-type attacks while shrugging off Focus Blasts. This time however, the metagame took a more offensive step up, which is too much for Trashmadam and her lack of recovery. She can still take on Jynx, provided she doesn't get Lovely Kissed, Tricked or setup on by almost every other threat in the tier that isn't weak to Steel or Bug (don't even try to run both STABs, you'll be deadweight without like 3 support moves). The dwindling of Psychics and Grasses gave Trashmadam that much less to do, as her defensive typing doesn't resist common attack types such as Ground, Flying, Rock, Fighting, Electric, and arguably Water. Almost every offensive and defensive threat today can overcome Wormadam-T, sometimes without even trying. Her Fire weakness is much more problematic now since Fire attacks are getting pretty popular. Trashmadam doesn't quite cut it in today's metagame, the only threat I can think of that she actually counters rather than wall is Jynx; she can't fight back very effectively against any other threat due to lack of recovery and loses in most one-on-one situations (that or free Spikes). No, this time I'm not even going for D-Rank for Wormadam-T, she is utter trash this time round. She sets up Rocks like any other, walls (few) stuff without actually doing shit back and cannot beat another afterward (like she'll survive against the first), and...that's it. E-Rank from me.
Woah there. At least you could consider a balanced argument and look at
This link This link or This link Now what, I do not understand why this type of exaggerated and somewhat rude response was not directed at these three posts as well, but was to the previously posted one.





























