• Check out the relaunch of our general collection, with classic designs and new ones by our very own Pissog!

NOC OC NOC GAME OVER - Now Despair

Status
Not open for further replies.
Blazade I can tell you this, I care about one person in any game, moi. And since he hasn't played mafia in a while I'm willing to lynch anyone villagewolf would. If someone wants to argue I protected Fort or Walrein, please show me where I was biased and my judgement of the accusations turned out to be faulty, as I have been requesting from Moody and Haruno for a while now.
 
Me being villager would rather not have the lynch be a villager and the thing is, I am one. Idk where you're coming from with your "you have nothing to fear right" line but being mislynched is definitely something I wan to avoid
 
I feel I have already addressed it and if you're not satisfied with the answer well you might not be getting a better one so you can keep beating a dead horse or you can start some discussion elsewhere
 
MoodyCloud said:
I feel I have already addressed it and if you're not satisfied with the answer well you might not be getting a better one so you can keep beating a dead horse or you can start some discussion elsewhere
Click to expand...
quote it then. Also again I wish to lynch you for your reasoning, and logically if you can provide the grounds of your reasoning then I have no ground to stand on calling it out. Look at knights, have you seen me rag on him AFTER he provided an answer to my question that I felt explained where he was going? So yes if you are a villager, then obviously you had the village's best interest at heart and therefore while your grounds for the walrein vote may be biased towards your own thought process, it certainly couldn't be called objectively wrong. Now if you are as I suspect scum with a clear agenda for going after Walrein then your unwillingness to explain your train of thought or provide evidence would make complete sense.

Btw this goes for Haruno too really, if you addressed my points I posted just pre LMAO, if you are a villager, that is how you get me off my back.
 
I've got nothing for you, Texas. My own action failed so i thought for a while we were targeting the same person.

Hitmon doesn't give us a reason for failure though so I have no clue. Would have liked to have been exonerated in any case lol.
 
You are in this case actually. I lied about targeting you to see if anyone would jump on you for my claim and to see your response (which I deem towny).

My actual target was LightWolf
 
Well if I could guess, I hope something like an Omniguard was on my ass, especially after my disagreement on the cancerous lynch or the way too many town reads on me. Or you know you are lying or the role that hit you is fake(obviously from everyone else's point of view there is the possibility I'm scum)

Oh Blazade just posted, that actually seems to add credence to the omniguard theory(because if it wasn't omniguard a safeguard just tried to murder me and I hate them, or I'm bad one of those 3)

Also Texas if you are expecting anything from your vote, I'd enjoy a reasoning.
 
I'm starting to think Light is confTown at this point. This "cut the crap and give me answers" aggro is super Towny. By that logic, the "chainsaw defense" theory from the scum!Walrein tangent is less muddled and more invalid (and the entire tangent is seeming less likely, too).
 
I wanted to see some posts from you while under pressure from people and to see how you approached this day knowing that you had some protection on you that prevented me from confirming your role.

I like that you've been aggressively pushing people to defend their reasoning but dislike that you've yet to push cases of your own much yet, though I acknowledge your post intending to reads list later today.
 
I get the wish to confirm these actions, but how about people don't go around announcing who they targeted just yet, especially considering the REASONS people would choose to target me(cough Texas' proxy inspect cough)
 
I do not see how attacking cases of others, is not my own case on them. Faulty reasonings people do not explain and refuse to address is my bread and butter along with hypocrisy which will be the main thing I look for in said future list.
 
LightWolf said:
I get the wish to confirm these actions, but how about people don't go around announcing who they targeted just yet, especially considering the REASONS people would choose to target me(cough Texas' proxy inspect cough)
Click to expand...
Actually, I believe that the letter receiver should be able to mostly confirm my claim (because I claimed to him/her. That was why I asked if the hosts could be trusted, after all), and would hopefully not disclose my motivations.
 
LightWolf said:
I do not see how attacking cases of others, is not my own case on them. Faulty reasonings people do not explain and refuse to address is my bread and butter along with hypocrisy which will be the main thing I look for in said future list.
Click to expand...
That's fair from a certain perspective. It's not the lens that I focus on for scumhunting and what I dislike is that your tactics aren't yielding things I can effectively use, but I'm not scum reading you for it.

I'm not inclined to lynch you right now, at any rate.
 
LightWolf said:
I get the wish to confirm these actions, but how about people don't go around announcing who they targeted just yet, especially considering the REASONS people would choose to target me(cough Texas' proxy inspect cough)
Click to expand...
My motivation for targeting you is simple. I was confident in town!Walrein based on a strong town slip. You also townslipped, to a less certain degree. Town confirming you creates a town circle we can use to direct the game while Scum confirming you prevents that bias from being exponentiated.

For the time being you and Blazade are in my town circle moving forward
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top