I have been thinking of ways to get a more organised sequence in which analyses are to be GP'd, and this idea struck me - that the GP order should be prioritized based on the Pokemon's current viability ranking. Why I propose this is that I feel that only official tiers get the relevance in GPing, and Other Metagames analyses have been pushed into obscurity. Why I am basing the priority on viability is that a tier's / OM's most viable Pokemon should, at the very least, have an analysis so as to direct a newcomer to it, which can advice him / her on the benefits and limitations of one spread of one spread over the other. It always happens that the more viable the Pokemon is, the more it's used. The GP queue could be based on usage, but since viability changes are less common than usage changes, I think GP queue based on VR would be more defined, and lead to lesser backlog in any single tier, and instead would be a backlog of Pokemon which won't be needed by people as much as the pertinent ones....
If more than two Pokemon in the same VR rank have GP checks pending, arrange them in order of "First created thread"; if there are two Pokemon whose analyses from the same VR rank have been created on the same date, maybe its usage on the ladder for the month in which its analysis was initiated.
If this would mean more job for the already hands-full GP team, they could have a person or two just to arrange the analysis into the priority brackets, since it would need some time and effort to constantly update that.
If more than two Pokemon in the same VR rank have GP checks pending, arrange them in order of "First created thread"; if there are two Pokemon whose analyses from the same VR rank have been created on the same date, maybe its usage on the ladder for the month in which its analysis was initiated.
If this would mean more job for the already hands-full GP team, they could have a person or two just to arrange the analysis into the priority brackets, since it would need some time and effort to constantly update that.