oh ı forgot SU but what ı meant was in next gens we will more likely have tons of new mons and more tiers so wouldn t it become confusing for newer players so for example why not renaming ou uu to 1u or 2u so we can name below zu 7u 8u etc(ı know it maybe sounds harsh for tier leaders but that was just a suggestion for newer gens)SU (the thing below ZU) theoretically exists already just p dead because it's only on a discord server
Personally I find these new names somewhat confusing... When I see UUBL it seems to me that they should be usable in UU (at first glance, obviously makes sense after just the smallest amount of thought). I feel OUBL fits about as well (as BL is UU's banlist and pokemon that aren't OU by usage but still "OU") and is less confusing to newer players. Although both feel like suboptimal solutions and I've personally never had an issue with simply numbering them.
I don't understand this change. If you really wanted to avoid newer players being confused, you could simply extend BL to Borderline/Banlist. I also agree with Triangles on BL staying for GSC, RSE and DPP as per his reasoning.
All in all, this was an interesting change. I suppose it couldn't hurt being a bit more specific.
Ubers BL is Anything Goes, hence Rayquaza-Mega being rated AGWhat about UbersBL?
With this renaming you may as well have BL stand for BanList, makes it a whole lot less complicated
Honestly, how is Pooble not worth including here? And perhaps one day, a Zooble...BL1-4 has been replaced by "Ubble, Rubble, Nubble, and Zubble."
This is a good change.
Ubers is not a usage based tier, so naming it as such seems like a poor choice. "AG" is indeed a banlist of a banlist, but there's not much else that can be done about that.Also lets make Ubers U1 and Mega Rayquaza will be in BL1. Because right now he is in a banlist of a banlist which makes no sense. In that case U2 would be what is now OU and what is now UU would be U3.