Hmm, how about a Ice/Dragon Pokemon?
wigglytuff
marowak
sunflora
chimecho
quagsire
qwilfish
arbok
persian
lunatone
solrock
kecleon
rotom
sandslash
seaking
granbull
cherrim
purugly
carnivine
primeape
girafarig
hitmonchan
hitmonlee
hitmontop
jynx
banette
zangoose
seviper
dodrio
mr. mime
lanturn
tropius
lumineon
vespiquen
all these pokemon could use evolutions and you still think it limits your creativity?
Evolution of an existing pokemon
Edit: We could vote for roles first if you are worried about that stalling
Edit Edit: all the pet pokemon (granbull, delcatty, persian, seaking, purugly) got shafted lol.
Oh, and to whoever said that making an evo doesn't limit creativity.
Let's say Smogon votes to make a Skarm evo. The next poll comes in that we want a Special Sweeper...
So I've been observing for awhile now, and here's how the two options appear to me. Most of this has been said already, but I'll reiterate.
New Evolution:
Pros:
Cons:
- Provides us with a framework for creating the new evolution. Gives a basis for sprite design, moves, and abilities (if we decide not to make new ones).
- Lets us rescue our favorite old Pokemon from obscurity and give them a competitive edge.
- Saves us the trouble of designing pre-evos.
New Pokemon:
- Limits our creativity as to what types can chosen, what moves make sense flavor-wise, and what designs that the sprite artist can come up with.
- Many voters may drop out of voting if their favorite Pokemon is not chosen to evolve.
- Also, if a voter's favorite Pokemon is chosen, he may disagree with choices that go against "his" pre-set design for that Pokemon, or try much too hard to pass his design off to others.
Pros:
Cons:
- Gives us full creativity over everything.
- The end result feels more like the community's Pokemon, as no one person can claim ownership over the idea. Voters are more likely to continue voting in later threads.
- More likely to get noticed by Nintendo/GameFreak for being an original design, and doesn't require a convoluted evolution method.
Anyway, with all that said, my vote goes to completely new Pokemon. If we can avoid having the Pokemon designed solely to take out or stall very specific threats in OU, I think it could work. Maybe even make it a UU Pokemon like others have mentioned.
- I remember someone mentioning this in the Syclant thread. Having total freedom over the design can lead to the Pokemon seeming contrived, in a way. Being able to tweak a new Pokemon's stats to be just enough to OHKO or outspeed certain threats makes it too obvious that we're designing this solely with competitive battling in mind. Of course, this could also happen with a new evolution, but the current Pokemon's typing, abilities, or stats can serve to limit this.
- Small need to design a pre-evolution. This wasn't that big of an issue in the last thread, but it still adds an extra poll. Of course, we could just design a single stage Pokemon, but that's rather boring.
If we do end up going for the new Pokemon, I would hope that we eventually get around to making new evolutions. Maybe make one evolution for every three new Pokemon?
As an example:No, choosing what to evolve is choosing the role. Evolve Torkoal? Bulky fire. Evolve Farfetch'd? Physical sweeper with Baton Pass options. Evolve Kecleon? Special tank with a great support movepool.
The 'which Pokemon do we evolve' poll would basically replace the 'what role do we want' poll.
That's one of the best "first posts" of all time. Makes me wonder if this is a sock puppet? Regardless, great summary of the arguments.
As an example:
30% want a Zam evo
30% want a Gar evo
40% want a Skarm evo
Clearly, 60% of the community want a fast Special Sweeper. But the Pokemon will turn out as a Physical Wall.