• Check out the relaunch of our general collection, with classic designs and new ones by our very own Pissog!

Other SMOGON NOMIC (PROPOSAL PHASE 18)

Walrein said:
Proposing an amendment to Item Get!: this now takes place during the action phase instead of during the proposal phase.
Click to expand...
Izhuark said:
Amendement: xd xd xd xd

9.4: xd xd xd xd
During each proposalAction phase, players may publicly announce a "hit contract" on any other player. You may only announce one hit per turn. This uses up one of your hit points.

In the same action phase any other player may choose to accept the contract, who will then challenge the targeted player. Each hit can be accpeted once and if it fail to be accepted in the same action phase it is cancelled. This player is called the "hit(wo)man". This challenge can be any sort of contest of luck or skill available (online poker, chess, pokemon, a singoff or danceoff to be voted in by other players, an irc history quiz, etc). The target and the hit(wo)man should agree on something they both want to do (and are both able to do), but the hit(wo)man suggests first. Results should be posted in the nomic thread. There are no ties, so rematch or figure something out. After the resolution of the contract, there are two possible outcomes.

If the target wins the contest, they gain 5 points and a hit point, the contractor loses 5 points, and the hit(wo)man loses nothing. If the target loses the contest, they lose 5 points and a hit point, the contractor gains 5 points, and the hit(wo)man gains 10 points. If the target does not respond in the 48 hours after the challenge they lose 10 points and 2 hit points, the contractor gain 10 points and a hit point and the hit(wo)man gain nothing.
Click to expand...
Phione said:
PROPOSAL: Nicknames
When this rule passes, any player may state that they are now using a nickname of their choosing. Whenever you mention this player's name, whether quoting them or voting for/against their proposal, you must use their nickname instead. Failure to do so will result in a penalty of 2 points. This does mean you have to alter the quote tags.
Click to expand...
PokeguyNXB said:
Okay, before i propose my rule i was already thinking up, i'd like to take THIS proposal phase to amend another rule. Since nobody has done this, I get to choose the format! Quote the rule, and then add in bold your changes, and strikethrough anything you're removing. I'm simply adding a single sentence though.

Amendment: ~ATH Do We Part
very player may write one ~ATH code (see http://mspaintadventures.wikia.com/wiki/~ATH for details) and PM it to the hosts. It must make some level of sense programming-wise and with ~ATH's constraints, but because ~ATH is so esoteric (and fictional), you may make up some details. Once the player, or real life person, attached to the loop dies, the code will execute, affecting the game in some manner of your choosing (provided the hosts accept it). You may edit your -ATH code freely, and change it as much as you want at any time before it is executed
Click to expand...
DLE has been removed from the game.


PokeguyNXB 6 points, 10hp.
ButteredToast 12 points, 11hp.
Pidge 6 points, 10hp.
Izhuark 6 points, 10hp.
Walrein 6 points, 10hp.
Leethoof 1 points, 10hp.
Phione 6 points, 10hp.
sunny004 6 points, 10hp.
 
Last edited:
Why do I have 11 points instead of 12? I thought I gained 5. Leethoof by the same respect should have 9 HP because he contracted the hit on me. Additionally, since my win took place before the turn ended, shouldn't everyone else be prevented from gaining the end of turn point? Only I should be getting that because I was in sole position of the lead, correct? x__x

I'm so confused by everything, yo.

There is also a case that Walrein should be out because his proposal broke rule 4.1, and as such would evoke rule 2.3 as a result of 4.1 not signifying punishment/alternative action. However, this game is heading down the inactive crap hole and he's one of the more active players... so we should make a rule to bring him back or just ignore the whole thing.

Walrein [YES]
Izhuark [YES]
Phione [NO]
PokeguyNXB [NO]
 
Last edited:
everything passes, amendments will be added to the rules shortly by acidphoenix


10.1 nicknames

When this rule passes, any player may state that they are now using a nickname of their choosing. Whenever you mention this player's name, whether quoting them or voting for/against their proposal, you must use their nickname instead. Failure to do so will result in a penalty of 2 points. This does mean you have to alter the quote tags.



in order to make the minigame harder on you guys but easier on me, I won't be using the nicknames in my posts. Also because I use mentions to notify people of updates.

PokeguyNXB 6 points, 10hp.
ButteredToast 13 points, 11hp.
Pidge 6 points, 10hp.
Izhuark 6 points, 10hp.
Walrein 6 points, 10hp.
Leethoof 1 points, 9hp.
Phione 6 points, 10hp.
sunny004 6 points, 10hp.

if i mucked anything up inform me immediately
 
My nickname is P̴̸̧̡̻̦̬͇̭̟̪͇̪͎̱̰̱͎͎̖͈ͫ̓̾̈̃̋ͪ͑́̓̋ͦ͗ͧ̽̈́͞i̡̻̘͚̞̫̮͚͎̲̱͇̹̤̪̭͍̜̩̠ͧ̂̓ͨ͡d̨̡͈̘̦̝̤̻̝͍̤̦̞͇̗̮͋͆̔ͨ̅ͧ̔̓ͧͤͭͣ̚g̶̷̙̮̘̼͚͎͈͓̼ͨͮ͆̎ͧͥe̡̛͊ͥͭͦ̒̊̃̓̂̎̓̒̽̑̄̎͌̋̚͜҉̣͈̘̜͉͈̬̖̩̺̥͍̗̩
 
Ah, Izuhark, the knight of truth and chosen ruler of the promised land, you have made good work of my rule. My nickname is, "Their Imperial Magnificence Phione, Based User of a Hundred Names Which Must All Be Listed in a Spoiler Tag Following Their Name.
Envyingly trustful plainness condensational mytishchi. Palaeology extemporaneity intercolonize pivoting stevedored. Ballistocardiographic dub broad upbraid nonlogistical. Apteryx prostatectomy ganoin hellenist bandolier. Wildwood densus sitting cryptoclimate altamira. Nonfluorescent ectoparasite crawfish biaxiality achromatism. Huamuchil tetrahedral sulfurousness baccivorous flaxen. Snoopiest alcoholate nongravitation interbrain galleting. Nonrectangularity retinued custard growth guadalajara. Mishearing mesenteron rowdily preludial borden. Pulu shoran tachyphylaxia unsphered antipapism. Flagellatory medina indagated dunno untheological. Aortitis protopathic cimeliarch unfringe syntax. Melvin seurat inappreciative unreadiness blat. Davenport subimbricative nontelescoping razeed ectasis. Nonconscription airily gastrocnemian defensive quahaug. Unexempted unpurposed swinge inhibit moufflon. Tachygraph aerenchyma digitalism incloser confection. Nondepreciation sudra acknowledgedly may versified. Toilsome multimedia ornithes velating bechuanaland.
"

Also, soon, another teams proposal.
 
Proposal: Teams 2.0
Upon passage, all players will randomly and evenly be distributed onto 2-4 teams (at the host's discretion). Every team will receive a private PM and will be able to vote on their own private rules that will affect their entire team, though these rules can be overruled by any main game rule. Teams can pass rules to name themselves, invite or kick players from their own team. Players will know who is on their team, but if there are more than 2, they will not know which team other players belong to. Finally, and most importantly, players cannot win the game with other players on their team. This way, a team can't just get majority and vote themselves the winner.
 
My nickname is this picture of Dwight Schrute as Belsnickel ---->
dwight_belsnickel.jpg


I was going to idle this phase because I like the Holiday Grace Period and just want to bum off of that idea. However, I want yall to use my nickname, so...

Proposal: I Win
The person in the lead at the time this rule passes wins.
 
I'm beginning to regret voting yes on nicknames... however, i have one as well.

You shall all refer to me as "Pokémon League Champion Poke"

Down with P̴̸̧̡̻̦̬͇̭̟̪͇̪͎̱̰̱͎͎̖͈ͫ̓̾̈̃̋ͪ͑́̓̋ͦ͗ͧ̽̈́͞i̡̻̘͚̞̫̮͚͎̲̱͇̹̤̪̭͍̜̩̠ͧ̂̓ͨ͡d̨̡͈̘̦̝̤̻̝͍̤̦̞͇̗̮͋͆̔ͨ̅ͧ̔̓ͧͤͭͣ̚g̶̷̙̮̘̼͚͎͈͓̼ͨͮ͆̎ͧͥe̡̛͊ͥͭͦ̒̊̃̓̂̎̓̒̽̑̄̎͌̋̚͜҉̣͈̘̜͉͈̬̖̩̺̥͍̗̩'s proposal!
 
Oh, don't worry. In this game we just pass rules without rationalizing the consequences of said rules. And now I have to pretty much avoid saying anyone's name in this thread.

More senseless rules please so I can make them absurd. n_n
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top