• Check out the relaunch of our general collection, with classic designs and new ones by our very own Pissog!

[Standard] Awesomeness Mafia: Game over! George Bushes and neutrals win!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Just for everyone's knowledge, Finn has claimed to me(and to others) that he is a neutral with a Win Condition that does not interfere with the village's. Now, obviously the village controls the lynches. Is it really a good idea to kill off someone we can obviously control, threatening to lynch him tomorrow if he does not comply? Of course, given that we have no other leads, I suppose we may as well kill off neutrals, but I really think we can do better with this lynch. As such, I am going to abstain from voting until someone gives me proof Finn is harming the village.

Edit: Also guys, I think we need to remember not to hit majority until Finn has had some time to defend himself. As such, I propose we not hit majority until he says something. In other words: Stop voting NOW to avoid a mafia stealth lynch.
 
I really hope this doesn't bite me in the ass

I have retracted my lynch for the meantime, I recommend others to do it as well, trust me. I would rather lynch off some random than be so hasty.

Send Uncle Sam Off to Iraq to die a glorious and unneeded death
 
After discussion with Itchni, we are going to hold off lynching me until my full role PM can be proven, since it's an odd role to claim, but honestly it's true. Then again, there's a village silencer (usually a mafia role >_>). So we decided that someone else is more deserving to be lynched.

Raito must be calculated using the golden ratio to determine the length of rope required for his noose.
 
Of course, lynching the obvious target doesnt help us at all (see Amake >_<)

I'd prefer villagers post, rather than say Raito and Coronis (for example) who havent at all. it's a bit suspicious to me. More than a neutral who wants the player they persuade to be lynched.
 
FinnRagetti said:
Of course, lynching the obvious target doesnt help us at all (see Amake >_<)

I'd prefer villagers post, rather than say Raito and Coronis (for example) who havent at all. it's a bit suspicious to me. More than a neutral who wants the player they persuade to be lynched.
Click to expand...

yeah i haven't posted at all, misplace your reading glasses?
 
Blue_Tornado hasn't posted at all either.
I'm not voting until you guys have solid proof that Raito is Mafia. If Raito's inactive, why waste a lynch on him anyway? He's likely to be subbed out, and then we could get an explaination from the subbee.
 
I agree, lynching an inactive is usually not the best idea. Mafia members tend to be MORE active than standard villagers if anything, because they have more interesting roles in general. I really don't see how randing an inactive is going to help all that much.
 
We have absolutely no definitive proof that Finnragetti is mafia. We can easily lynch him after, but i really have a really good hunch that he is not mafia. Let's leave him alone for now.

VIllagers only really huge power is their lynch. Its the only way we can reliably kill someone. If a villager won't vote we lose part of out power. If he is villager then speak up and vote.
 
UncleSam said:
Edit: Also guys, I think we need to remember not to hit majority until Finn has had some time to defend himself. As such, I propose we not hit majority until he says something. In other words: Stop voting NOW to avoid a mafia stealth lynch.
Click to expand...
Deja-vu from overkill, simply deja-vu.

Anyway, lynching someone based off of inactivity is really risky. It could be some mafioso hiding, but it could also be a villager that just doesn't have a reason to post in the thread, or just someone wanting to keep a low profile.

If we really want to randtarget someone it's best to do so by finding some shaky claims. Meaning someone needs to get some claims. I'm pretty sure LW can still get a lynch going through IRC, as he's only restricted to posting in the thread. I think.
 
Itchni said:
We have absolutely no definitive proof that Finnragetti is mafia. We can easily lynch him after, but i really have a really good hunch that he is not mafia. Let's leave him alone for now.

VIllagers only really huge power is their lynch. Its the only way we can reliably kill someone. If a villager won't vote we lose part of out power. If he is villager then speak up and vote.
Click to expand...

Um...in case you didn't notice, I never even posted a lynch vote for Finn. In fact, I argued against lynching him until he spoke up for himself. And explaining the basic role dynamics of mafia is unnecessary and unhelpful for the purposes of finding a lynch target. No shit an inactive villager is unhelpful, but it is better than a dead villager AND the loss of a lynch? And as for your reasoning on Finn..."You really have a really good hunch"? Seriously? I can assure you that there are better leads than that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top