zamazenta is one of the most used 'mon in the tier because it clicks iron defense and wins. there's nothing deep to it; owns every physical threat like kingambit, gouging fire, dd kyurem,... the fact it checks darkrai is an added bonus. the "variety" of counter-play and sequences you desire was explained in subsequent paragraphs that you conveniently glossed over (like you did my entire post). i'm even sparing you in this regard since you claimed bulky offense is just as restricted, further from the truth considering this archetype can fit assault vest and booster energy 'mons.Why do you think it sees so much usage? And do you think only having a single check that doesn’t strictly fit on stall is healthy enough? Think this shit through man. You’re proving my point in emphasizing this usage, not your own.
To be balanced, you need a variety of checks/counters that fit onto archetypes.
Ting Lu is hardly a good Darkrai measure. You switch into one Wisp or Nasty Plot turn and games go south so quickly. Darkrai is frequently paired with shit that abuses Ting Lu being weakened and Ting Lu does not even 1v1 Darkrai if it has to switch in on any move that is not Dark Pulse. It even loses 1v1 to the Grassy Darkrai shit regardless of that. This is a trap more than it is a check or counter.
What kind of fantasy world are you living in? Ice Fang was seldom used in DLC1 on Zamazenta. Go through every SCL game -- it was clicked/revealed 4 times all season and saw less than 5% play on high ladder. I spammed the fuck out of Zama and had 1 team with Ice Fang out of 50+ from this period. This some revisionist history nonsense that statistics and the actual tier disprove.
But forget the rest of the post: this is the crazy shit right here. Usage and win rate have so little to do with what's broken or not.
If you want to think of it like this, then should we just never ban shit that sees usage ever? Why draw the line here? Why did we ban shit earlier on when you liked the metagame then? Is there just a point where we stop improving things even if a ton of people think there's room for improvement??? If you're going to push for tiering based off of fear for the future, then you gotta codify somewhere when to draw the line and what we are afraid of the metagame becoming.
You are so critical of me for allgedly not thinking through the hypothetical ripples of any given ban before-the-fact despite this not being part of tiering, but you have not thought through at all the precedent your logic sets and how arbitrarily you apply it. If we did it like this all generation, we would just be playing OUBL at that point.
I can assure you most uses of the Haha button are just disagreements or laughter, not targeted harassment. It's not that deep. If people genuinely are harassing you, please report it -- we will be happy to investigate.
ting-lu forces a high value trade where you die in exchange for keeping darkrai at a low amount of hp. there is another sequence you can try where if you get hazards up early one can whirlwind shuffle, keeping ting-lu at a serviceable amount of health and darkrai in a position where it can't nasty plot again later. also clicking will-o-wisp is a sign of a broken threat? what's it gonna do? wisp then ice beam for 30% while you chip it down with ruination? wisp then nasty plot and suffer from only having 2 coverage moves? this is not a trap at all.
ah
actually
i know what it is.
all of you are so used to ting-lu taking 12% net from iron moth fiery dance that when something pushes that envelope it needs to be thrown into ban discussions.
i voted ban on archaludon. i voted ban on volcarona. i do vote ban on shit contrary to popular belief. what i won't vote ban on is a healthy offensive threat that keeps other healthy 'mons like gliscor from being suspect test worthy. this is not about drawing a line. i'm telling you straight up i don't find this 'mon broken or even in the same tax bracket as other suspect test candidates such as previously tested gouging fire, kingambit, zamazenta, garganacl, raging bolt, wellspring,... garganacl in particular received a similar score to darkrai over the course of multiple surveys. you are free to claim darkrai is broken, but i'm similarly free to say your arguments were trash and disingenuous.
even now, the best you can do is fact check a small ice fang line and drop a haha react on my shit. address my points in bulk instead of nitpicking with this defeatist attitude.
either that or take the L and move on bro
Last edited: