Time Magazine's most influential person is...

How is it shocking? He's influential enough that he made millions run autovote programs.
 
Looks like Time got raided by /b/. This is why you don't let the internet decide something for you.
 
Marblecake, also the game.

Good job railroading the poll 4chan.

Why does anyone take TIME seriously to begin with?
 
Looks like Time got raided by /b/. This is why you don't let the internet decide something for you.

I don't see why this was so bad. The best way to discover influence is to let the other people influenced vote, and clearly the other candidates did not influence people enough to use autovoters.
 
the majority he won by is pretty surprising, he received ~16.8 million votes, while second place anwar ibrahim received ~2.3 million...
Looks like Time got raided by /b/. This is why you don't let the internet decide something for you.
sounds about right lol
 
i think it's interesting

4chan has this kinda newschool dadaist element to it that makes me think sometimes that they're on to something really important
 
i really like the concept of a bunch of people organised in a decentralised way to achieve a certain goal, but considering how most people on 4chan just do things for the hell of it i doubt that they'll achieve anything significant (unless it happens to be fun for them)
 
I am really excited by this if Time actually insists that they were not hacked and honor this. I was not thinking earlier and assumed that the hack only extended to the marblecake part, but Limbaugh over Obama has to be hacked too.
 
I can't believe Obama has not kept any of his campaign promises and that his approval rating is dropping. Damn fools.
 
I am really excited by this if Time actually insists that they were not hacked and honor this. I was not thinking earlier and assumed that the hack only extended to the marblecake part, but Limbaugh over Obama has to be hacked too.

Not sure about hacks, but you could easily make a script to do this sort of thing I expect.
 
I think it's a but late for him to be the most influential, particularly over the internet. Many members of 4chan are too new or stupid to know who Moot even is at this point. Back in 2007? This would be more relevant. Today Moot stays in the background and watches shit unfold as his friends of mods take care of everything. The site is also pretty much trash today as well. Encyclopedia Dramatica is where it's at. <-I hate the lack of grammar in such a figure of speech.
 
I think it's a but late for him to be the most influential, particularly over the internet. Many members of 4chan are too new or stupid to know who Moot even is at this point. Back in 2007? This would be more relevant. Today Moot stays in the background and watches shit unfold as his friends of mods take care of everything. The site is also pretty much trash today as well. Encyclopedia Dramatica is where it's at. <-I hate the lack of grammar in such a figure of speech.
This statement of yours implies that there was a time where 4chan was not trash. I am not comprehending this statement.
 
Back in 2005 to early 2007, it wasn't overrun with retards invading other sub boards every five minutes, /b/ was funny at times and /v/ actually had intelligent conversation, as did /x/
 
4chanwasnevergood.jpg

As Deck Knight said an internet poll, from TIME of all magazines, isn't really indicative of anything, but good for moot I guess.
 
Back
Top