you havent even claimed your role youre one to talkPeople really dont care that IPl is tracker + bpv and hasnt claimed any results huh!
you havent even claimed your role youre one to talkPeople really dont care that IPl is tracker + bpv and hasnt claimed any results huh!
He claimed already. BGB nowhere n1. Pulsar nowhere n2. Do you read the thread?ipl can you fullclaim results so realiti shuts up
Psypsypsypsypsythe ImaginaryNeon JALMONT a fairy
IPL has claimed tracker + bpv, a combination of two powerful power roles. Celever also has a BPV that broke from bgb which nobody has disproven, and AG most likely did not include two BPVs in the game. IPL tracked bgb n1 nowhere (bgb is the mafia roleblocker) and tracked pulsar n2 nowhere (they are mafia cop). BGB and pulsar have no reason to idle their abilities.
Why are you guys even considering IPL as anything other than scum?????
Now I have!did you read my post about the "if you forced me to pick" or no
IPL claimed tracker -> BPV (who claimed info role to absorb kill) which I think is somewhat reasonable and toaster was awful. But now he's claiming tracker + bpv and doubling down on the no results track which is just sillyInteresting that pulsar voted Toaster I actually strongly think it implies pulsar's partner is realiti or Psy and that was done intentionally to keep the second scum alive in IPL.
realiti's shift from "saving" IPL EoD2 to hard pushing him and lamenting being the only one besides me to be properly disbelieving him is notable. Could well be that he's pulsar's partner and didn't want to (probably) get rid of the second kill yet but now is happier to do so
ok the goldmine this is useful.ls reads
the NAIs: bluegummybear, toasterboi420, imperfectluck
I think the former two are struggling with the high skill ramp that initially getting onboard with mafia (while being a contributive presence) and are pretty NAI as such - you could make an argument that they are getting coached for what little they do positively contribute OR that they aren't getting coached based on how little they add. IPL is a weird case, they're NAI because afaik they havent played maf since back when i was last active, but i remember them being more skilled than "we shouldn't vote." and non-interactive. but it's been over a decade presumably they have a job and/or family or something.
confident in their towniness: Neon, Psy
i know people have grown less fond of the villager image clear. that's fine. some people didn't like it at all at the start. but i still care about it and Neon does edge out Psy here w.r.t. how much towny im confident in them being. i'd be very surprised if either flipped scum. this has little more than what i was saying about the villager image thing, so feel free to disregard it (if anyone is taking any read of mine genuinely idk)
i'd bet on them being town: HH
he's maintained a consistent behavior, which is maybe hard to go off of because he's yet to roll scum. that's fine. i think that a scum HH does struggle with maintaining behavior, but that went pretty poorly for me that one game i was sure HH was acting different and scum. this one is weaker for me than the first two, but i do think HH is comfortably town here.
these are probably town but i wouldn't be shocked if they were scum: jalmont, zippy, realiti
a wide range in a group, admittedly, but these are all vocal folk who are confident in what they've been saying and are folks that haven't really at any point given me strong worries about them being scum. no, i don't have jalmont and ehmcee together, i think there's a non-zero chance that the pairing there is something more than genuine mason twins, be that jalmont opportunitist grabbing the spot and ehmcee playing along fsr, it not being masonry, etc etc.
i think there is multiple scum in this group: Ehmcee, Celever, pulsar512b
i'm most confident about pulsar, who didnt interact with the villager image stuff and kept trying to bait me into fluff chats. and then overnight went, "ls is scum" and as far as i can tell has no progression or explanation towards that. ehmcee and celever have both given me reasons to think they're scum, unlike the above group - celever gives me lover's dance vibes, and i see the logic behind what folks like psy have been calling ehmcee scum.
ykw this is extremely valid lolIPL claimed tracker -> BPV (who claimed info role to absorb kill) which I think is somewhat reasonable and toaster was awful. But now he's claiming tracker + bpv and doubling down on the no results track which is just silly
So yeah, overall a similar structure in that the villager fiasco was valued by both, besides that me + pulsar + zippy are shared scumreads with the remainder of BGB's scumpool being in "NAI" alongside BGB himself. This includes a fairly niche overlapping opinion on Hydro town, who wasn't particularly widely townread, either.
Are you saying the format of that post isn't NAI -> Town -> Townlean -> Scumlean -> Scum ?a) dont call that post a "shared zippy scumread" because it isnt
I think I agree with this recollection, it doesn't mean you weren't consensusing with BGB on it though. Like, once again, it's a proven correct read, it's just that your mentalities on this stuff were similar early into the game where a lot of other people were in totally different places in terms of solving.b) at the time of that post hh was not read by most and those that were reading him were reading him town
Are you saying the format of that post isn't NAI -> Town -> Townlean -> Scumlean -> Scum ?
TBF, because the last category is "there are multiple scum in this group" and if that's all 3 of us or 2 of us + a NAI then "these are probably town but could be scum" is a correct title for a scumlean category lolif it was that then i'd say that. idk how you got "scumlean" out of a category that started with " these are probably town "
BGB has played a fair few times he's acc quite used to mafia, fwiw. That's why it's kinda notable, he knows what he's doinglike this is simply a scum who is not used to mafia that bought into "psy neon and fairy are hardlocked town" adjusting their reads to match up with an easily digestible town POV - psy d1 was hard to pin down thoughts from, and neon is allergic to creating reads
lowwhat are the odds ipl tracked two people who also died the same night
considering his targets are BGB and pulsar? very very small I think lol, neither one of these were particularly obvious deaths (actually pulsar kinda was an obvious kill and also a bad tracker target lmao)what are the odds ipl tracked two people who also died the same night