I'd be way more willing to accept the "Team Plasma is misguided/hypocritical" angle if the game didn't stop to say "we gotta listen to people with different opinions, maaaan" fifty different times.
X and Y also loves this messaging, which is... misguided, to say the least, when they try to apply this lesson to Lysandre, who's a genocidal maniac who decidedly does not have a point. Black and White at least gestures at an ethical dilemma - and while I don't think it's perfectly handled, I can accept that this is a game for children, and I respect what the story accomplishes from that lens. X and Y's chronic centrism seriously rubs me the wrong way, especially considering recent geopolitical events. No, both sides do not always have a point - Team Flare wants to wipe out 99% of the human population and 100% of the Pokemon population, and usher in an age of the 1%. You can't write Lysandre as a proponent of fascist rhetoric (ugly people, make the world beautiful again, etc.) and then act as if he somehow had something good to offer the world.
Sycamore: "I always knew that he [Lysandre] desired a beautiful world... But what I really wanted was for him to put his ego aside and lead everything to greater heights. I never had this discussion with him, though. So I'm partially responsible for this."
Calem/Serena: "Lysandre chose only Team Flare. You and I chose everyone but Team Flare. But since our positions forced our hands, you can't really say any of us were right. So maybe... If both sides have something to say, it's best to meet halfway..."
Even KISEKI, the song in the end credits, otherwise one of my favorite setpieces in the series:
Search it out, and find the way:
the point where we can all meet.
The point where we're all the same.
There it lies: the future we seek.
Respecting other people's opinions is a valuable lesson to teach children, certainly. Yet when you construct a narrative where one side is represented by a bunch of genocidal lunatics who earnestly believe the world is fundamentally impure, and the other side is represented by people resisting against the notion of being killed en masse, that's an irresponsible message to start espousing! Lysandre can either be a tragic antihero with a point that we can take something from, or he can be an evil monster. You cannot write both. By comparison, N has a legitimate moral stake in the story, and is being actively manipulated by Ghetsis - his arc is all about overcoming that past abuse and seeing the world for himself. Lysandre has no arc because he's a megalomaniac - and that's a fine way to write a villain, but the narrative pretends after the fact that he was somehow just as good within as N was, and I can't respect that at all.
This also leads to the worst written dialogue in the entire series: Calem/Serena's battle at Victory Road. I already posted a snippet, but the full text is kinda necessary to understand what I mean:
Calem/Serena: "I've been thinking ever since that incident in Geosenge. Lysandre chose only Team Flare. You and I chose everyone but Team Flare. But since our positions forced our hands, you can't really say any of us were right. So maybe... If both sides have something to say, it's best to meet halfway... So I decided that from now on, I don't want to battle just to win but to see how you and your Pokémon think and feel! And that's the kind of Pokémon battle I'm challenging you to now!"
This is nonsense. Complete, utter nonsense. These points do not connect to one another at all. It's a non-sequitur leading into another non-sequitur. "Maybe the fascists had a point" -> "standard Pokemon friendship talk"???? Calem/Serena's arc in general is generally bad - an NPC learning that they're an NPC in a Pokemon game is funny, but also leads to them feeling completely aimless - but this is supposed to be the capstone of their arc! And yet they say absolutely nothing of substance. And after the battle:
Calem/Serena: "It's hard to put a finger on where, but I think you and I are alike. And that's why I didn't want to lose to you. But I think the reason we're alike is because we have so much in common. I'm really happy that we're friends."
"We're alike because we're alike" I mean, yeah.
(Yes, I know this is neither an unpopular opinion nor strictly related to Team Plasma. I just started typing. Oopsie.)












