I'm sorry to say this, but I don't think this is up to the quality that Volcarona needs. While it's true that Volcarona is in need of a revamp, i'm afraid that I find that your writing just isn't up to par, especially when you take into account how important Volcarona is and the original analysis's high quality. While we appreciate and encourage the contributions of newer writers, we also encourage newer writers to start with easier analyses rather than jumping in with both feet on a more important and more challenging Pokemon. If I may offer some constructive criticism; The writing is decent, but your sentences are short and fragmented, and the overall flow is stiff. I would suggest against structuring your analysis around stringing bullet points together and focus on writing a flowing analysis that isn't quite so flat.
I hope this doesn't dissuade you from writing any more analyses in the future, I really hope that we can meet again under different circumstances.
Anyone interested in taking this over?