Hooray! A Deck Knight post!
Every radical cleric? Remove them from Western nations.
You say this like exiling people for their thoughts is an easy and ethical thing to do for Western countries. It's not. You can't just take somebody's passport and send them off to their "secondary" country (if they even have one), let alone for them having an opinion you consider "anti-Western" or whatever. If the situation gets out of hand, deal with it in your own country, but don't go "lol not my problem" and send them away to another country so they can spread their bile somewhere else.
Most of these places only understand the universal language of strength. So show strength and they'll leave you alone.
You forget that terrorists generally already live in the country they bomb. The big problem with terrorism is that you can't hold one country accountable for it, terrorism can be anywhere at any time. You think in terms of nation states controlled by governments that will surely back off when you show how many nukes you got, but terrorists aren't part of one particular nation state, in case of Daesh aren't under control of a central governing body (yes, ISIS has leaders, but terrorists don't require the permission of some big shot to blow up Paris, they're individual actors). So flexing your muscles and dropping bombs all over Syria and Iraq
might solve the situation in the territory occupied by Daesh (not even mentioning the death toll of innocent civilians in case you just bomb the shit out of those places), but they don't solve the problem that there are Islamic people in the West itself who feel disillusioned, secluded, and most of all angry.
Show weakness, submission, dhimmitude, and pandering and you may as well invite them into the halls of government, because they will outbreed you and do to other Western cities what they already did to Malmo, Sweden. (It competes with Somalia for Rape Capital of the World.)
You speak of Muslims as though they are an invasive species with a hivemind that says "must take over Europe". If you believe that a few percent of the population can "outbreed" the natives to such a degree that they will soon form a majority, you're rather foolish, sorry to say. Believe it or not, but there is no global network involving all Muslims working towards the decline of Western civilization. They do not intend to take over the government and even if they for some reason do, they will be stopped in due time.
Oh and on Israel "displacing" anyone: Judaism precedes Christianity by 2000 years and Islam by 2700. The Jews are peaceful, democratic, and pro-Western. The Palestinians by contrast teach their schoolchildren that Palestine will not be satisfied until the rocks scream out "there is a Jew behind me" so they can execute them.
Disregarding your blatant stereotypification and generalization of Palestinians, what disturbs me more than anything else about this line is how you seem to think it's totally normal and moral to intervene in a state and basically take it over simply because the guys you represent share your set of values. There is no objective moral standard that tells us that the West is superior and therefore somehow has the right to claim any "inferior" country as theirs if they so please. Regardless of what you think of Palestinian culture, it is a moral outrage to simply seize part of their country (which later gets even further annexed due to Zionist bullshit) while Palestine is hardly threatening the West in any way.
This attitude of "if the West does morally abject shit it's fine because it's the West and we're the best" is utterly cancerous in general. It's the most blatant form of white supremacy you can imagine, for it basically shows that while we are supposed to mourn the losses of Americans or French or Belgians due to terrorist attacks, when the West decides to bomb Iraq or some shit and causes many, many civilian deaths, it's just "collateral damage", and when the West annexes a non-Western country it's totally cool. Try to see non-Western people (specifically innocent civilians) as actual humans for once, because they are, and just because they happened to be born and raised in a country that does not support your set of values doesn't make their lives any less valuable. Causing civilian deaths is a war crime, no matter where the civilians are from.
Oh and by the way, "the Jews are peaceful"? Don't make me laugh. Without generalizing them (because there are plenty of progressive Israelis who aren't about that whole violence business), the Israelis
did cause a substantially higher amount of Palestinian deaths than vice versa. See
this (ignore the blurb of text, I know Al Jazeera isn't unbiased and I'm merely linking it for the statistics) for just one example of the death toll in one of many Israeli-Palestinian conflicts. For every Israeli death, there have been roughly 7 Palestinian deaths in this conflict alone. Regardless of questions like "who started the conflict?" (because just because somebody punches you, that doesn't give you the right to stab them in the gut), it's hard to imagine a supposedly "peaceful" country causing this many deaths.
Historically, Islam was causing Thomas Jefferson and the British Empire trouble via the Barbary Pirates long before anyone was discussing the British Mandate of Palestine. Long story short it's Palestine that is a recent addition to the world. If they spent as much on their own economy as they do on Jew-killing they might be able to scrap together a functioning nation-state.
Islam, not Palestine. A lot of Muslims countries radically differ from one another, you might do well to remember that.
I don't know what you're getting at exactly, but I suppose you're trying to rationalize why the Jews "deserve" Israel by vaguely mentioning something about pirates and how Palestine is a recent addition to the world, which I suppose refers to the fact that long before Palestinians, there lived Jews in these parts? Sorry, but I'm not really buying this logic, for if we were to tell which country belongs to whom by telling what people lived there "first", we would have to request of all Americans with British, French, Spanish, Portuguese etc. ancestry to move back into Europe, for that part of the world belongs to the Native Americans. Of course I may very well misunderstand your case, so please do tell if I did and clarify what you're actually trying to get at here, for winning a discussion by merit of straw men is a foul win.