This thread wasn't made for you to say that. This is a discussion thread, and somewhat of a reference.
^ Agreeing with you gabriel, but viper's Pokemon showed up as legit even though they were hacked, so be weary on that point.
Obi, don't feel like we're ganging up on you dude! We're just expressing our opinions, don't feel mad or anything! =D
@Obi: So, your point of view is that both cloning with AR, quick hatching and egg checking is hacking, fine. But I should assume you don't trade often here on Smogon, because people clone their pogeys (or ask cloners to do so) with AR, and you think cloned pogeys are hacked, right?
If by cloned you mean cloned with an AR, then yes. If you use a method of cloning allowed by the code of the game, then it's not hacked.
Also, I'd like to point that your Pizza example was really misplaced. A pizza is different from a sandwich, but a Quick Hatched/Egg Checked pokemon is still the same as a Normal Hatched one. Your argument fits the following dialogue:
OK, how about this example? Few Volkswagens are actually made in Germany. They are primarily produced in Brazil and Mexico. If I want a car that was made in Germany, and I buy a Mexican Volkswagen, then the car is not a German Volkswagen. The result may be the same, but saying it's made in Germany would simply be incorrect.
It's just a matter of concept. You consider hacked any kind of stuff which somehow was directly or indirectly by any cheat device. A strict vision, I'd say. For me, Hacked pogeys are the ones that were directly modified by a cheating device. On the quick hatch, I just make eggs hatch faster. On the Egg Check, I check the good IVed Eggs, and delete the bad ones. I didn't changed any IV, OT or any kind of pokemon data. You can say I hacked the method, but the pokemon is legit.
If the method used to obtain the Pokemon is illegitimate, then the resulting Pokemon is.
It's just like Arceus, Shaymin and non-movie Darkrai. You hacked the event but the IVs are completely legit. So they're certainly not hacked at all. The same with cloning. You created a completely new pokemon based on a legit data. Did I changed any data? No, so it's still legit.
You can get Shaymin and Darkrai in the Japanese version strictly within the game. There is no known method to get a legitimate Arceus.
So, any of the pokemon on the above situations (cloned by AR, hacked events, quick hatched and egg checked) are legit. Maybe the methods used to get them are not, but the pokemon do. If you start this pursue for the pure and extreme legitimacy, pokemon won't be fun at all. I just want legit pokemon. Is the pokemon's legit? I don't care how did you get it.
If I were to play on the carts, I wouldn't particularly care, either. But that doesn't suddenly make it legitimate.
You can't get Shaymin and Darkrai in the game without an AR. Unless you have a Japanese version, which almost nobody here has.
And if cloned by AR Pokemon are hacked to you, then you can't trade with anyone on the Wi-Fi forums lol.
You can't get Shaymin and Darkrai in the game without an AR. Unless you have a Japanese version, which almost nobody here has.
And if cloned by AR Pokemon are hacked to you, then you can't trade with anyone on the Wi-Fi forums lol.
I have a jap version of both but am too tired to play it(besides what the fuck would be my name when I don't know how to write in Japanese I only know a few words/ phrases....). Anyways Yoko damn 40 posts a day that's overkill >_<. Oh well enjoy pc++
Truthfully I would say that first of all no matter what you do quick-hatching and insta-egg are both considered hacks(untraceable hacks no doubt). Cloning is fine but personally when I get wifi again I'd clone a couple of copies of my pokes through the GTS and then have those copies cloned using the AR(just to be safe, but it doesn't really matter). Oh and I agree with Obi just because it's undetectable doesn't make it legit.
As I said, or you consider Quick Hatch/Check Egg and cloning hacks, or you consider both legit, they follow the same principles. If you stop to think on why you clone with AR, and why you use quick hatch/egg check, you'll find the same reasons and the same kind of pokemon.
I'd say that clones are even worse, because they were directly touched (not modified) by the AR, while on the two methods above, only the eggs were.
Of course, if you still think that way, it's fine. But if you stop to think you'll see you're being contraditory defending cloning and being against the hatching tricks.
You see cloning doesn't give anyone here the advantage and you're basically creating a replica of a code you already have. Something you wasted many of hours on. So cloning isn't bad. Where as the "booster" codes give you an advantage over those who do not use it and it would significantly reduce the time spent breeding.
Yes, a HUGE advantage, but since everyone has that advantage, I wouldn't consider it as an advantage (lol) since nobody here GTS clones.
But to get the easier/faster cloning you need a Pokesav/AR. To get a easier/faster hatching, you need a Pokesav/AR. Again, Cloning and the breeding tricks follow the same principles and doesn't harm the pokemon in any aspect. Or you love both, or you hate both.
But as I explained a thousand of times before, AR Cloning/Quick Hatch/Egg Check follow the same principles. It's just pointless to accept one and be against the others.
Btw, do you people think it's okay to to hack TMs, berries and cash?
Items are okay. I mean, how many BP is it for a darn Choice Band?