Have I included any 'I's, 'my team's in my previous posts? These wordings are on my last post just to specify my argument to the situation. Seriously stop using nitpicks as an argument.
As far as I remember, usage can be used as arguing for viability, but it is a weak one. Have I mentioned anything unviable as suction cups Cradily in my posts? I don't get the idea when I use COMMON VIABLE phazers like Hippowdon, Empoleon, Snorlax, Mega Aggron as examples and being commented as 'overspecialized', 'niche' etc when they NATURALLY uses these moves Florges or not. It is not like shit like unviable scarfed WoW Chandelure which is beaten by Snorlax anyway.
The problem of Florges is inconsistancy, especially when the phazers really good in UU and Florges have absolutely zero ways to overcome them unlike the situation of Aegislash. It doesn't matter how well Prankster Riolu last gen can do to a team without protect or faster priority. It is still nothing more than a Punchshroom gimmick. The way I have mentioned about dealing with Florges isn't any niche shit method like Suction Cups Cradily but there is actually four great pokemon using it. Florges cannot properly perform against certain team type (seriously, how many stall teams run none of those) makes it inconsistant enough for A+.
I do not want usage as an argument for viability. One cause does not equal the result of the other.
Also, Florges is not being moved down at this time. Your arguments have been clearly flawed, as has been pointed out by many posters. Please refrain from arguing this change, unless a development in the metagame arises.









