Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the whole point of bans and of the metagames themselves to make it so you can play any playstyle you want without having any one of them being unviable? Not disagreeing with your points, you had very good ones, but what's your idea of a healthy meta? one where you are forced to play one archetype to win or one you can play the archetype you enjoy to win? If the former, than you must be some kind of robot, cause I sure as hell am not playing a game I don't enjoy.Banning a Pokemon because it causes a metagame shift is such faulty reasoning. If there are ways to check something but you simply don't want to use those Pokemon because they are restricted to certain playstyles, you are either 1) Biased against certain playstyles, or 2) not accepting of a playstyle's weakness to Greninja. Greninja destroys balance, that is understandable, but I didn't see a Heracronite suspect in XY because of how badly it destroys stall. Pokemon don't get banned to preserve playstyles, is my point here..
I actually like the suspect ladder. Although I've been playing like crap because I wen't to bed at like 5am, I've had some really good games there and I kind of like the greninja-less meta. I like adapting to the new meta playstyles people are now using, because it's fun and because it's something I am actually capable of adapting to. it really opens up a lot of new playstyles that take skill to adapt to because we're so used to adapting to the same greninja meta crap. So just like user forumbeta, I'm not voting ban because I think "greninja is horribly broken zomg get it out", I'm doing it because I like the greninja-less suspect meta and I want to give it a chance.