After lurking here on the Stark Mountain forum for quite a while, I noticed that were a lack of threads that help promote long-time discussion on the board. As such, I hope to promote some discussion with this thread.
---
I'm sure all of us have encountered the strange Anti-lead that hardly anyone uses, such as Sharpedo. However, often times we wonder if such Pokémon can actually prove to be effective. From my own experience, Anti-leads tend to work against only one kind of Pokémon, and can generally be beaten by others. As such, Anti-leads tend to get outclassed by strictly reliable leads, such as Azelf, in the purpose of setting up Stealth Rock, or Swampert, which is designed to fare well against most type of leads. In this thread, I hope to investigate whether Anti-leads are still worth using in today's metagame, and how Anti-leads can be tailored to beat the most common leads in today's metagame.
First, I think it is appropriate that a definite term for an Anti-lead to be constructed. Without having a community accepted definition, it will be impossible to discuss this topic with everyone providing their own intepretation of the term.
Here is a definition that I think is a good starting place to begin with:
For the purposes of this thread, I will be using the "LeadApe" set as an example.
Infernape @ Focus Sash
Trait: Blaze
EVs: 64 Atk / 252 Spa / 192 Spe
Naive Nature (+Spe, -SpD)
- Fake Out
- Stealth Rock
- Fire Blast
- Close Combat / Encore
---
I'm sure all of us have encountered the strange Anti-lead that hardly anyone uses, such as Sharpedo. However, often times we wonder if such Pokémon can actually prove to be effective. From my own experience, Anti-leads tend to work against only one kind of Pokémon, and can generally be beaten by others. As such, Anti-leads tend to get outclassed by strictly reliable leads, such as Azelf, in the purpose of setting up Stealth Rock, or Swampert, which is designed to fare well against most type of leads. In this thread, I hope to investigate whether Anti-leads are still worth using in today's metagame, and how Anti-leads can be tailored to beat the most common leads in today's metagame.
First, I think it is appropriate that a definite term for an Anti-lead to be constructed. Without having a community accepted definition, it will be impossible to discuss this topic with everyone providing their own intepretation of the term.
Here is a definition that I think is a good starting place to begin with:
Changes:An Anti-lead is a Pokémon that is uncommonly seen in the lead position, and is tailored to take down other common leads. An Anti-lead should generally be able to stop opposing leads from gaining the momentum in a match, such as through laying down Stealth Rock, etc...
- Does not necessarily need to rely on surprise factor
- How many leads should an Anti-lead be able to beat
- What tactic must be used to take down other leads
For the purposes of this thread, I will be using the "LeadApe" set as an example.
Infernape @ Focus Sash
Trait: Blaze
EVs: 64 Atk / 252 Spa / 192 Spe
Naive Nature (+Spe, -SpD)
- Fake Out
- Stealth Rock
- Fire Blast
- Close Combat / Encore
From this set, we can tell that Infernape manages to complete each of the following objectives against other leads:
After determining all of the characteristics of an Anti-lead, we can attempt to answer the main question in this thread: Are Anti-leads ultimately viable over standard leads, or should standard leads be used for their reliability?
Apart from using this thread to define what makes an Anti-lead an Anti-lead, I'd also like for others to contribute any Anti-leads they may have devised themselves. I plan on making a list of viable strategies to use for an Anti-lead after a few responses to this thread.
For those who managed to read through this thread, I highly appreciate it. This is my first time trying to start a discussion on Stark Mountain, so I hope everything goes well!
- Beat the common suicide leads, Azelf and Aerodactyl, one-on-one
- It will always be guaranteed to set up Stealth Rock, or if the opponent decides to attack, prevent it
- Its fantastic dual-STAB allows it to hit other common leads for super effective
After determining all of the characteristics of an Anti-lead, we can attempt to answer the main question in this thread: Are Anti-leads ultimately viable over standard leads, or should standard leads be used for their reliability?
Apart from using this thread to define what makes an Anti-lead an Anti-lead, I'd also like for others to contribute any Anti-leads they may have devised themselves. I plan on making a list of viable strategies to use for an Anti-lead after a few responses to this thread.
For those who managed to read through this thread, I highly appreciate it. This is my first time trying to start a discussion on Stark Mountain, so I hope everything goes well!