This post. I fully support this, and some other people seemed to as well. Oh hey, look at that, here it is again! Quite frankly, I think it's ridiculous that this: is true. "IF fully paralyzed" is perfectly reasonable, and I simply don't see why it's illegal. I would also like to point out that I am totally against the combination of not reffing illegal actions and ignoring illegal substitutions while reffing; I think it's a ludicrous inconsistency. When I'm reffing or ordering second in a battle, I just tell people when their substitutions are illegal and have them change the sub, but I think everyone should, on the same principals for making people fix illegal actions (whatever those are; I would be fine with getting rid of the rule that forces refs to not ref illegal actions, one or the other imo). EDIT: words of wisdom: 14:37 dogfish44 Chance subs should cover things that occur by... chance! Also, when you look at this thing, I must say that the current sub rules are just not very good. I do, however, like the somewhat recent revamp to attack subs.