This discussion highlights the inherent asymmetry that plagues any kind of text-based interaction (which is of course the exact same phenomena that one can experience in a face-to-face conversation, exponentialized by the distance and objectivity that text imposes). That we disagree on a symbol that is intended to explicit an emotion and make it clear to both parties what the other is feeling, is an ironically frustrating proof that we will never be able to fully understand each other. How can you tell what I want to express if your interpretation of a given glyph is so widely opposed to mine?
In conclusion, in -.- the . is the bird's whole body (the - are the wings)