1. Welcome to Smogon Forums! Please take a minute to read the rules.
  2. Click here to ensure that you never miss a new SmogonU video upload!

Data Official Smogon University Usage Statistics Discussion Thread, mk.2

Discussion in 'Smogon Metagames' started by Antar, Jun 4, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Stratos

    Stratos Banned deucer.

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2010
    Messages:
    6,991
    ive resigned myself to the idea that duu will never be a valid tier, it makes things easier
  2. Antar

    Antar
    is a Battle Server Administratoris a Programmeris a Super Moderatoris a Community Contributor
    Official Data Miner

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    3,874
    It's lower in the suspect stats...
  3. Ununhexium

    Ununhexium dog
    is a Contributor to Smogon

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2014
    Messages:
    3,190
    | 52 | Zapdos | 3.27145% | 140008 | 3.662% | 109669 | 3.774% |

    Antar can we PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE use 1825 stats for OU because I like UU and Zapdos
  4. Antar

    Antar
    is a Battle Server Administratoris a Programmeris a Super Moderatoris a Community Contributor
    Official Data Miner

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    3,874
    Ununhexium, no. Stats at the 1825 level are too vulnerable to manipulation by a small number of players. And the reason you gave is also the WORST POSSIBLE REASON EVER FOR DOING ANYTHING EVER.
  5. Arcticblast

    Arcticblast Ultra Ball off of Abyssal Hand for Lele for Guzma for game
    is a Smogon Social Media Contributor Alumnusis a Super Moderator Alumnusis a Community Contributor Alumnusis a Tiering Contributor Alumnusis a Battle Server Moderator Alumnusis a Past SPL Champion

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2008
    Messages:
    7,497
    Pretty sure that was a joke
  6. Ununhexium

    Ununhexium dog
    is a Contributor to Smogon

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2014
    Messages:
    3,190
    Yeah but I also really like Zapdos
  7. Mega-Pokebattlerz

    Mega-Pokebattlerz

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2015
    Messages:
    347
    And people call me a shitposter. Also, is there a reason why PU never gets any drops?
  8. TheMCGamer13

    TheMCGamer13

    Joined:
    May 4, 2015
    Messages:
    143
    I think NU just hates PU and wants to see it crumble into a tier where only Rattata is available... or just sheer stupid luck.
  9. littlelucario

    littlelucario Banned deucer.

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2012
    Messages:
    2,232
    why do we discuss the drops in the actual usage threads instead of this one?
    Cheryl. likes this.
  10. bludz

    bludz a waffle is like a pancake with a syrup trap
    is an official Team Rateris a Forum Moderatoris a Community Contributoris a Tiering Contributoris a Contributor to Smogon
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2014
    Messages:
    1,670
    Ok so I intended to bring up something like this but decided to read the thread and see if it had been addressed, lo and behold it has (twice, actually, yes I read the second one as well).

    I think my issue is the separation of too many similar spreads. So for example a Landorus-T spread with 4 HP EVs moved into Def, or 8 SpD EVs into Spe. The real issue that arises is we have about 4-5 different spreads with 8-10% usage or so and then about 50% "other" which can't really be interpreted at all.

    While I think the above suggestion is great I'm not sure how much time or effort it would require, and doesn't solve issues of mixed spreads that are similar. I have an idea for a proxy which could allow players to discern breakdowns in a more general way: Nature percentages.

    Generally a pokemon can run many different spreads that are similar to achieve the same effect, but most of the time its nature will remain the same. There are exceptions like some bulky Scizors running Adamant and so on, but in general you can distinguish spreads between bulky (Impish/Bold/Calm/Careful/Relaxed/Sassy) and offensive (Timid/Jolly/Naive/Hasty/Modest/Adamant) simply by looking at the natures. The other thing is Natures won't get fragmented the same way as EV spreads and we can get a much clearer look at the full breakdown - I assume there could still be an "other" category but it would probably be much closer to something like 10% than 50%.

    I also have another question. Since Megas are being tiered separately now, are you going to change the way you derive usage stats? For the above example, maybe I am interested in seeing how many Mega Scizors are bulky and how many are offensive, this still can't be done because Scizor still conglomerates the Mega and non-Mega form. It's also a bit annoying for Charizard - although this is a special case - because if I want to see how many Charizard Xs run Earthquake, I can't find that data.

    I am still interested in total item breakdowns on pokemon like Scizor - how many run Scizorite, Band, LO, Lefties, etc, but the full breakdown seems less important because we're almost discussing 2 different pokemon (and the tiering process now reflects that).

    PS: I think this is an excellent resource, so thanks for your time and effort

    EDIT: well ok I see that Mega usage is done separately now so that answers my question. Still think Nature %s would be great!
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2016
    The Idealistic, Karxrida, AM and 2 others like this.
  11. MagikaripIsOP

    MagikaripIsOP

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2013
    Messages:
    279
  12. Antar

    Antar
    is a Battle Server Administratoris a Programmeris a Super Moderatoris a Community Contributor
    Official Data Miner

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    3,874
    See the FAQ in the second post.
    MagikaripIsOP likes this.
  13. MagikaripIsOP

    MagikaripIsOP

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2013
    Messages:
    279
    So for the 1825 weighted stats, is 1825 the baseline?

    Also is there way you could put a win percentage stat on there based on how many games that pokemon won and lost?
  14. MagikaripIsOP

    MagikaripIsOP

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2013
    Messages:
    279
    Heck, it'd also be an actual good use of the "Real" usage stat. And a good statistic to cite when discussing suspects/possible suspects

    sorry for the double post, it's been a whole day and I doubt anyone would notice an edit to my post when it doesn't even alert anybody.
  15. Antar

    Antar
    is a Battle Server Administratoris a Programmeris a Super Moderatoris a Community Contributor
    Official Data Miner

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    3,874
    MagikaripIsOP , win percentage is a meaningless statistic, since we do matchmaking on our ladders. In a perfect world with a perfect matchmaking algorithm (and a perfect distribution of player skills), everyone's W-L ratio would be 50/50. Average weight and viability ceiling are MUCH better metrics for how "winning" a Pokemon is.

    Folks, it'll be a few more days for the March stats. Total screw-up on my part--I accidentally reran FEBRUARY'S stats rather than running March, and I only just now noticed as I went to upload the stats. Sorry.
    Last edited: Apr 5, 2016
    dysbber162, Sir Kay and Death Bolt like this.
  16. MagikaripIsOP

    MagikaripIsOP

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2013
    Messages:
    279
    Everyone's win ratio would be 50/50, but the Pokemon won't be.

    Clash Royale and various other games have skill based matchmaking but the developers still balance things (cards in Royale's case) based on it's win ratio. Clash Royale and Smogon have very similar ranking systems but that doesn't stop cards from being overpowered. It is similar to how Mega Kangaskhan or Soul Dew Lati@s should theoretically make the user have a higher chance to win games on the OU ladder.

    Average weight isn't too accurate because otherwise Landorus-T would be S rank. I assume by viability ceiling you mean the 1825, 1500, etc. stats?
    I am 99% sure that there are Pokemon with higher win rates than Landorus-T.

    (Don't mean any disrespect in any of this obviously, I just really want win percentage as a statistic.)
    Last edited: Apr 5, 2016
  17. Antar

    Antar
    is a Battle Server Administratoris a Programmeris a Super Moderatoris a Community Contributor
    Official Data Miner

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    3,874
    This kind of analysis, frankly, doesn't work, for the same reason average weight is a shitty metric. This is because, just because a Pokemon is powerful doesn't mean the average player uses it well. Let's say, for the sake of example, that Pikachu is the best, most overpowered Pokemon in the game. Then you'd have the top players using Pikachu to great effect and winning their matches. The problem is that since Pikachu is the anime mascot, you also have 100x as many players who have NO IDEA what they're doing who are using it and dragging the ratios / averages down.

    What you're trying to determine is how having a Pokemon on a team helps that team win. I tackled this problem from the opposite perspective: how much is a given Pokemon holding a team back? That is, if you have a certain Pokemon on your team, what's the best you'll be able to do on a ladder? This measure is called a Pokemon's viability ceiling, and I encourage you to read more about that here: http://www.smogon.com/forums/thread...re-of-how-far-a-pokemon-can-take-you.3546373/
  18. MagikaripIsOP

    MagikaripIsOP

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2013
    Messages:
    279
    That specific example only works for Pikachu though. For most Pokemon the people that actually use the pokemon at least somewhat correctly would outweigh the clueless players.

    Viability ceiling is a cool statistic though. Thanks for that and it should hold me over even if you never publish a win rate
  19. Antar

    Antar
    is a Battle Server Administratoris a Programmeris a Super Moderatoris a Community Contributor
    Official Data Miner

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    3,874
    You'd be surprised. PS is *very* active, and only a small fraction of players (especially in tiers like OU) are what most of us would consider competitive.
  20. MagikaripIsOP

    MagikaripIsOP

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2013
    Messages:
    279
    Maybe it could be a 1500 (any number basically) and up statistic?
  21. SparksBlade

    SparksBlade blood heats skin prickles you kindle something in me
    is a Pre-Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,513
    http://www.smogon.com/stats/2016-03/ubers-1760.txt
    | 9 | Rayquaza-Mega | 15.14961% | 65770 | 8.758% | 43256 | 8.536% |

    i assume Rayquaza-Mega is any Rayquaza with Dragon Ascent? could this be changed to just Rayquaza(there's a separate entry for just "Rayquaza" which i assume is Rayquaza without DA)
    | 71 | Rayquaza | 0.63578% | 19048 | 2.536% | 11925 | 2.353% |

    im sorry if this it the incorrect place for this
  22. Antar

    Antar
    is a Battle Server Administratoris a Programmeris a Super Moderatoris a Community Contributor
    Official Data Miner

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    3,874
    The M-Ray thing is a known bug and on my to-do list. I just have to decide out how to programmatically handle it without breaking Anything Goes.
    MagikaripIsOP and SparksBlade like this.
  23. dodmen

    dodmen Ain't no tuition for havin' no ambition
    is a member of the Site Staffis a Team Rater Alumnusis a Global Moderator Alumnusis a Community Contributor Alumnusis a Tiering Contributor Alumnusis a Contributor Alumnus

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2014
    Messages:
    1,396
    I'm not sure how feasible this is or if it's the right place to ask, but for the moveset stats, would it be possible to have a separate section for just Nature?

    Currently the "Spreads" section doesn't really give much information at all because of all the variations based on where the 4 extra EVs go, random Speed creep, etc. For example, Florges in uu-1760 looks like this:

    [​IMG]

    If there was a separate section with something like "Calm: 50%, Bold: 40%, Modest: 10%", that would be a lot more helpful than what's currently shown. Is this possible/not too difficult to do?
  24. Antar

    Antar
    is a Battle Server Administratoris a Programmeris a Super Moderatoris a Community Contributor
    Official Data Miner

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    3,874
    dodmen, I used to list Nature separately from EVs, but people seemed to find that LESS useful than the current configuration.

    I've considered having a separate section for each stat, so it would look like:

    Atk
    252+: 10%
    252: 6%
    248: 1%
    128: 4%
    0: 58%
    0-: 21%

    Or something like that, but then you lose the correlation. I've also considered combining similar sets (e.g. 4/252/0/0/0/252 and 0/252/4/0/0/252) but there's a lot of strategy that goes into placing those last four EVs. The best I can recommend is that you look into the JSON files in the chaos folders, which contain the usage of EVERY spread and then maybe write your own analysis to combine them as you'd like. I don't know if you have any sort of programming background, but JSONs are super easy to work with, especially in languages like Python.
    The Immortal and dodmen like this.
  25. dysbber162

    dysbber162

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2015
    Messages:
    6
    Sorry if this is a stupid question, but shouldn't the cutoff for dropping megas be lower than normal mons? You can only use one per team, and that's why their usage is so low compared to other pokemon.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Users Viewing Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 0)