While waiting for one or more answers (it can wait several weeks, there is nothing urgent), I post now my remarks for the last two generations:
For
Generation V, there is:
• some mons at that time had unreleased abilities (
I found a list here) and all have in their Smogon analysis a section called "Unreleased" (which no longer exists in subsequent generations). However there are contradictory situations:
Serperior for example recence Contrary in the abilities but on the contrary
Feraligatr does not show Sheer Force. I have two proposals: either we do not indicate these nonexistent abilities, or we indicate them by crossing them (as does Showdown), like this "
Contrary";
• as Arena Trap has been
retroactively banned from the OU,
Dugtrio must descend to NU. On the other hand I am not for the suppression of the analysis now obsolete but for archiving (as it should have been the case for Pheromosa in OU SM or for Trapinch in PU ORAS);
• as Snow Warning has been
retroactively banned from the UU,
Abomasnow must descend to NU;
• as
Carvanha has been
retroactively unbanned, he must return in LC on Smogon (I am very much waiting for the analysis);
•
Musharna is BL4 for Smogon but NU for Showdown. I guess it was banned from PU but
it was not an official tier at the time (as much delete
BL4 in BW);
•
Monferno is nothing for Smogon but it's NU for Showdown. Nothing surprising, this monkey has always been good in the worst tiers;
•
Servine is NU for Smogon but it is certainly an error (
Serperior is already in this tier) and without Contrary, this mon is totally useless and is therefore a vulgar NFE;
•
Whirlipede is NU for Showdown but it is certainly an error and without Speed Boost, this mon is totally useless and is therefore a vulgar NFE (this time, Smogon is right);
• a considerable number of mons are NU for Smogon but NFE for Showdown:
Magmar,
Gothorita,
Duosion and
Klang;
• a considerable number of mons are NU for Smogon but only LC for Showdown:
Pineco,
Wynaut,
Riolu and
Frillish;
• on the contrary,
Tentacool is only LC but it has an analysis in NU (it is nevertheless in the same situation as the preceding ones: a LC mon that has a specific niche). I do not take into account the analyzes of
Aron,
Magikarp and
Kakuna in the upper tiers (who are there for troll);
•
Scraggy is NU for Smogon but LC Uber for Showdown;
• based on the viability rankings of PU (
I make the list here), we see that
Bronzor,
Chinchou or
Pupitar are perfectly playable mons (for the first it is even a top tier). Should not we create NU analyzes for these three mons (if they have a niche of course)?
No problem for
Excadrill but I am very much waiting for the analysis in OU.
For
Generation VI, there is:
•
Jellicent is RU but it's categorized as NU on Smogon (this is certainly an error);
• as Arena Trap has been
retroactively banned from the OU,
Dugtrio must descend to PU (noted that
Trapinch's analysis was also deleted);
• a (very) considerable number of mons are PU for Smogon but NFE for Showdown:
Wartortle,
Pikachu (it has no analysis yet),
Weepinbell,
Electabuzz,
Dragonair,
Vibrava,
Dusclops,
Servine,
Whirlipede,
Krokorok,
Duosion,
Klang,
Fraxure,
Zweilous,
Quilladin,
Frogadier (it has no analysis yet in PU) and
Sligoo (same thing);
• a considerable number of mons are PU for Smogon but only LC for Showdown:
Chinchou,
Natu,
Munchlax,
Hippopotas and
Venipede;
• on the contrary,
Tentacool,
Onix and
Bronzor are only LC but they have a analysis in PU (they are nevertheless in the same situation as the previous ones: LC mons who have a specific niche);
• same thing for
Frillish but it does not have PU analysis (only in NU);
•
Murkrow is PU for Smogon but LC Uber for Showdown;
•
Cosplay Pikachu is special because it can not evolve: it is not NFE but PU (as does Showdown). Should we create a specific analysis for this form (even if it's gimmick)?
• based on the
viability rankings of PU, we see that
Mienfoo is present (it's a D rank certainly but that means he has a niche). Should we create a PU analysis for this mon?
• based on the
viability rankings of ZU (the unofficial tier below the PU), we see that
Lairon,
Magmar,
Scraggy,
Shelgon or
Lampent are perfectly playable mons (for the first it is even a top tier). Should not we create PU analyzes for these five mons (if they have a niche of course)?
That's it, I think I've done the trick (I could talk about gen VII but that's not the purpose of this forum). Do not hesitate to discuss some points that I mentioned.