I think XZ / YZ are more likelyI actually hope there isn't a separate game if there IS a z legendary, partly for the reason that it makes me feel that I should have waited for it. I'd prefer a X2/Y2 if ANY sort of add-on.Im just curious as to what they're gonna do for Gen 7 already haha
Or Z and W (the 3rd and 4th dimensions)I think XZ / YZ are more likely
Well we do have a huge regional dex and over 700 characters. I think reintroducing old Pokemon makes sense.Yeah the whole "You can use old Pokemon" is bullshit. I want to play the new games to use NEW Pokemon, and see new possible type combinations and how New Pokemon would work in competitive.
That's cool and all, but that's exactly what Black and White did to the maximum. While Black and White were very well-received - the highest rated main pair games since the original Red and Blue - the lack of old favorites was consistently cited as one of its negatives. People play the games for different reasons.Yeah the whole "You can use old Pokemon" is bullshit. I want to play the new games to use NEW Pokemon, and see new possible type combinations and how New Pokemon would work in competitive.
Thats what I was saying, pokemon needs to offer more than just a deep competitive formula for casuals. From the looks of it, X/Y is looking to be very much like DP, offering the bare basics in terms of single player content, and not be jam packed like B2/W2. X/Y seem like the testing ground for the new graphics engine GF is going for. If so, then the 3rd version/ sequel games should be quite epic.You have to remember that GF's intention with Pokemon is to makes a game for everyone, and that from the beginning.
It's really incredubly hard to makes the casual player, the competitive one, old and news to appreciate it.
And when you look at the review, you can say that they did it pretty well. So, I'm pretty positive, honnestly.
Whoa there, I HIGHLY doubt Klefki will be better than Thundurus-I and Tornadus-I. Bulkiest Prankster user, yes, but best? I doubt it.I'm putting a lot of hope in Florges right now, especially considering it looks fast and special-sweepy. All I'm hoping is that it has more than Garchomp's speed, and the longed-for Grass second typing. Then we're good to go. Also, Klefki seems like the best Prankster user in the game as of now.
But yeah, if the intention was to keep dragons in check, one would think they'd take the Infinity+1 stats and movepools into account. Its kind of disappointing how low their stats seem to be, and a bit worryingly reminiscent of the situation with Gen 1 Bug-types. At least Ubers will have Xerneas, if nothing else.
There's that Frolic move that looks ike it has at least 90 BP. And we know at least Marill gets it.About good fairies: we've seen no physical fairy moves so far. Mawile and Azumarill are moot without a good physical fairy STAB move
Right. Meant to say, best defensive. Definitely the genies are more of a potent threat.Whoa there, I HIGHLY doubt Klefki will be better than Thundurus-I and Tornadus-I. Bulkiest Prankster user, yes, but best? I doubt it.
I wouldn't be so quick to say that Azumarill is moot. Speaking in terms of boosted dragons, he can still come in on Outrages and scare them away with Ice punch (provided an ineffective Outrage doesn't lock them).About good fairies: we've seen no physical fairy moves so far. Mawile and Azumarill are moot without a good physical fairy STAB move
Not moot. Even if they don't get physical Fairy STAB (and I find that hard to believe, since it'd mean Nintendo hadn't learned from Entei and Flareon, when they seem to have), they both get Ice Punch. Ice Punch on the quad-weak dragons will still destroy them, and they'll still get the passive benefit of being dragon immune.About good fairies: we've seen no physical fairy moves so far. Mawile and Azumarill are moot without a good physical fairy STAB move
True. Id be dissapointed though. (Id really like to see the BP and info of that frolic move)I wouldn't be so quick to say that Azumarill is moot. Speaking in terms of boosted dragons, he can still come in on Outrages and scare them away with Ice punch (provided an ineffective Outrage doesn't lock them).
The defensive side of fairy will still be very useful. Mawile on the other hand... I'm not sure yet
Steel and fairy opens up a possible selection of annoying moves that those two may not have access toWhoa there, I HIGHLY doubt Klefki will be better than Thundurus-I and Tornadus-I. Bulkiest Prankster user, yes, but best? I doubt it.
Also, we need the move "Fairy Tail".
That, and it has six more resistances on top of that now.I wouldn't be so quick to say that Azumarill is moot. Speaking in terms of boosted dragons, he can still come in on Outrages and scare them away with Ice punch (provided an ineffective Outrage doesn't lock them).
It's in the Japanese eShop trailer. Marill uses it against Haxorus and takes off a good 60% off its health.(Id really like to see the BP and info of that frolic move)
Mawile does learn Ice Punch...via...Dreamworld. It does also learn Ice Fang. It's low BP may be moot because of Huge Power, though.I wouldn't be so quick to say that Azumarill is moot. Speaking in terms of boosted dragons, he can still come in on Outrages and scare them away with Ice punch (provided an ineffective Outrage doesn't lock them).
The defensive side of fairy will still be very useful. Mawile on the other hand... I'm not sure yet
Then why would they make the pokemon based on life and death, and then stick the DNA helix everywhere for the mega-evolutions (and arguably Xerneas' horns and Yveltal's diamond patterns)? I'm not saying that they aren't spatial coordinates (with the leap to 3D and pokemon rumored to evolve by rotating the 3DS, they definitely have that theme going), but why can't both themes be valid? I can't find the interview you are talking about, but if they really didn't want references to chromosomes and DNA, somebody didn't alert the art department.In an interview, the creators said X and Y are based on coordinates. They made it very clear they are not based on chromosomes. That argument is moot.