Did you think his legal problems would just disappear?
He's rich and white so... kinda?
Did you think his legal problems would just disappear?
He's rich and white so... kinda?
I’m a progressive— of course I’m critical of the Dem mainstream analyst class, but the point is that even they are levying the same criticism.Accurate. Can you export some of that reporting to the US? Our media is a fucking joke.
As is everyone else who wants democracy instead of fascism.
Has Nate Silver been right about anything in the last 10 years? In 2022, Nate Silver predicted Republicans would easily win the House and Senate. How did that work out?
What are they saying on international news?
They were saying it was a disaster, Biden froze up at times, looked deflated and weary, and there's a general sense of panic in Biden's campaign.
In contrast, they said that Trump was vigorously spouting lies all over the place.
I’m a progressive— of course I’m critical of the Dem mainstream analyst class, but the point is that even they are levying the same criticism.
To be fair, until Oct 7th happened I also still thought Biden WAS the least risky, strongest card to play— but I could have been wrong, I’d admit.
Honestly no idea what’s right or wrong— at this point for the love of God I just hope someone has the answer somewhere and Trump loses. Don’t care how
Not fully convinced but respect the sentiment.Biden is still the least risky. The primary is over and he is the nominee unless he decides to resign for VP Kamala Harris. And her polling vs Trump has never been good. Gavin Newsom, Gretchen Whitmer, Josh Shapiro, Wes Moore, Corey Booker, and all the other names being floated are all great and will make a good primary in 2028.
The reality is Biden is the nominee. It seems tough for people to accept but it ain’t changing. So we can do the work to win this election or surrender to fascism. As Gavin Newsom said, “the world is counting on is. Biden had our back. It is time we have his.”
From the five minutes or so that I could stand to watch, this is accurate. Trump did the exact thing that he's been doing for years, and Biden wasn't ready for it.They were saying it was a disaster, Biden froze up at times, looked deflated and weary, and there's a general sense of panic in Biden's campaign.
In contrast, they said that Trump was vigorously spouting lies all over the place.
Austrian and German news outlets are reporting about Biden's incoherence and inability to form sentences. There's also reports about the dems panicking and the possibility of Biden being replaced as the dem candidateWhat are they saying on international news?
Personally, I think it's kinda... bad how the US has to decide between two senile sex offenders
Looks like the DNC is working overtime today.
Here's a clip of Biden less than 5 years ago articulating a coherent thought, staying on message, and appearing cognizant in a way that he is incapable of doing today, despite the same "lifelong stutter" that is being used as an excuse for what is so obviously cognitive decline. This is so obviously not just a stutter and a cold. It reeks of desperation and Trump-supporter-level delusion that you can't even admit the blatant weakness of your candidate.
I'm not sure why you keep dismissing arguments against Biden as "right-wing talking points" with the same gusto that Trump supporters dismiss Trump criticisms as "liberal media bias" (the same media, incidentally, that now have headline after headline concerned over his fitness to beat Trump).
So, could any US politics specialists here tell me why did the DNC willingly chose a guy, that can barely form a fucking sentence, to run against a party that has been working overtime to LITERALLY make my friends existence illegal?
I dont care if it shows weakness, literally just take any semi popular governor right now and play him instead. The primary closes in two weeks, do it. All this talk about how Trump is bad, but no responsibility whatsoever, you're campaigning to stop evil incarnate and you offer THIS?
In short, until recently the prevailing thought among Democratic strategists (and most Democratic primary voters) in the US was that Biden had the best chance to win. The primary goal is to win and beat Trump, so the establishment lined up behind him. This is quite common in the US - in 90% of cases, the incumbent president will be the strongest general election candidate.So, could any US politics specialists here tell me why did the DNC willingly chose a guy, that can barely form a fucking sentence, to run against a party that has been working overtime to LITERALLY make my friends existence illegal? That wants to INCREASE income inequality and just arrest those at the bottom? That wants to lock up a person that decided over their own body? That wants to make sure that planet earth has no chance of survival to please their donors? That wants to fuck over every single person that doesn't fit their morals?
I dont care if it shows weakness, literally just take any semi popular governor right now and play him instead. The primary closes in two weeks, do it. All this talk about how Trump is bad, but no responsibility whatsoever, you're campaigning to stop evil incarnate and you offer THIS? And isn't it so funny that the same journalists who a week ago yapped about how great Biden is, are now 180'ing and trashing him like they were never part of the problem? what the fuck is dignity?
The DNC is utterly unresponsible, hypocritcal, pathetic and simply cannot be trusted to defend our rights against the enemy. If they don't send this man home they are a joke and they're gonna have to enjoy their sub 60% turnout.
Biden stutter has been public knowledge since before he won in 2020. He has worked hard to overcome it, which can be considered a disability and you are making fun of it. Sorry dude this is right wing garbage. They are the ones that mock disabilities. We can do better than that.
Let's not pretend 5 prominent Democrats dropping out of the race in 2020 all within a week, while Bernie was in the lead, was not a decision made by the DNC. The voters picked Biden because of the collective efforts endorsing him. It's insane to think that his success was entirely driven by voters wanting him.
No. What actually happened was that black voters overwhelmingly backed Biden in South Carolina, and for the third time in three open Dem primaries decided who the eventual Democratic nominee is. Why do you not credit Biden’s primary voters with any agency?
Both this and what RaikouLover said can be true. Yes, the dropouts (and more importantly, Elizabeth Warren specifically staying in the race to split the progressive vote with Bernie) were coordinated by and large by the DNC and Democratic political operatives to give Biden a bigger advantage. And yes, black voters in South Carolina gave Biden a nearly-decisive advantage already, well before those dropouts occurred.The dropout + endorsements came days before Super Tuesday which is when Biden effectively secured the nomination. Yes, Bernie likely wasn't going to get a substantial portion of the Black vote, but the 5 prominent dems that dropped out and endorsed him right before Super Tuesday certainly helped him secure the nomination. My exact words were "it's insane to think that his success was entirely driven by voters wanting him" and that is absolutely true. It was not a coincidence all of them dropped out days before ST and endorsed the same guy.
There was a primary and the voters spoke. The DNC did not even happen yet, nor do they have anything to do with this.
Convicted felon Trump is getting sentenced in two weeks. Did you think his legal problems would just disappear?