Serious The Politics Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
@ adeleine, indeed my intent in posting the statement is for it to be read and considered at face value. what part of the statement do you think is insincere?
Going from posting a terrorist brochure and stating it's to be taken at face value to posting statements made by the most authoritarian dictatorship on earth and, again, saying we should take it at face value

Man.
 
yo but what if Trump stepped down?

think about it. the republicans have a guy that's doing quite well even though he has 34 charges against him. imagine if they just got a guy who had 0 charges. just someone who wasn't a criminal.

not to mention quite a lot of people watch his speeches, his debates, the way he carries himself and... kinda think he's just not mentally fit for office, you know?

damn, they'd probably be unbeatable if they did that.


Honestly at this point i would be more worried about the J. D. Vance guy than old Trump himself, the guy is already setup as his potential successor while the Democrats failed to setup a proper successor to even older Biden in 4 years, which is absolutely pathetic.
 
@ localdog and sittingamer:

but what's the part that should not be taken at face value? the dprk has in fact always been a supporter of palestine, and it has never recognized israel. are you saying that is untrue, or what? saying "i think they are bad" a lot is not really an explanation.
 
@ localdog and sittingamer:

but what's the part that should not be taken at face value? the dprk has in fact always been a supporter of palestine, and it has never recognized israel. are you saying that is untrue, or what? saying "i think they are bad" a lot is not really an explanation.


You must be extremely naive if you think the most authoritarian country on the planet cares even the slightest bit about the human rights of a ethnic group in middle east. DPRK never recognized Israel by proxy of not been part of the Red bloc / being part of the western bloc and Palestines affiliation with 30+ years defunct Soviet Union in the 1960s. Its pure geopolitics that drives this statement in order to mobilize a illiberal worldwide coalition against USA and its allies.
 
@ localdog and sittingamer:

but what's the part that should not be taken at face value? the dprk has in fact always been a supporter of palestine, and it has never recognized israel. are you saying that is untrue, or what? saying "i think they are bad" a lot is not really an explanation.
I don't find it especially noteworthy that one of America's foremost geopolitical adversaries is also opposed to the existence of America's closest Middle Eastern ally. This is precisely the position that I expect North Korea to take. You presented the quotes without commentary in your original post (though I'm assuming that the emphasis was yours), and you've avoided sharing any of your own thoughts in your replies to this point; so I'm really not sure what it is that you're trying to get at here. What reaction were you expecting? I hope that you weren't expecting people in this thread to start calling North Korea, an autocracy built on brutal repression, based because they're pretending to care about Palestinian sovereignty in a situation where doing so allows them to attack the United States.
 
@ localdog and sittingamer:

but what's the part that should not be taken at face value? the dprk has in fact always been a supporter of palestine, and it has never recognized israel. are you saying that is untrue, or what? saying "i think they are bad" a lot is not really an explanation.
Because they have no respect for human life?

North Korea just parrots what China and Russia say but louder. They don't give a fuck about Palestine, they don't give a fuck about humans or anything that lives

What does it matter what they say? The DKRP shouldn't exist. It's just the biggest, most rotten prison on Earth
 
They don't give a fuck about Palestine, they don't give a fuck about humans or anything that lives
citation massively needed.



That does it matter what they say? The DKRP shouldn't exist. It's just the biggest, most rotten prison on Earth
The United States would surely agree with you. This is why they committed genocide against them:

A total of 635,000 tons of bombs, including 32,557 tons of napalm, were dropped on Korea. By comparison, the U.S. dropped 1.6 million tons in the European theater and 500,000 tons in the Pacific theater during all of World War II (including 160,000 on Japan). North Korea ranks alongside Cambodia (500,000 tons), Laos (2 million tons), and South Vietnam (4 million tons) as among the most heavily-bombed countries in history.
"Burn it if you so desire. Not only that, Strat, but burn and destroy as a lesson to any other of those towns that you consider of military value to the enemy." The same evening, MacArthur's chief of staff told Stratemeyer that the firebombing of Sinuiju had also been approved. In his diary, Stratemeyer summarized the instructions as follows: "Every installation, facility, and village in North Korea now becomes a military and tactical target." Stratemeyer sent orders to the Fifth Air Force and Bomber Command to "destroy every means of communications and every installation, factory, city, and village".
The bombing campaign destroyed almost every substantial building in North Korea. The war's highest-ranking U.S. POW, U.S. Major General William F. Dean, reported that the majority of North Korean cities and villages he saw were either rubble or snow-covered wasteland. Dean Rusk, the U.S. State Department official who headed East Asian affairs, concluded that America had bombed "everything that moved in North Korea, every brick standing on top of another." North Korean factories, schools, hospitals, and government offices were forced to move underground. In November 1950, the North Korean leadership instructed the population to build dugouts and mud huts and to dig tunnels, in order to solve the acute housing problem.
According to Charles K. Armstrong, the war resulted in the death of an estimated 12%–15% of the North Korean population

This is just from skimming wikipedia, which is largely biased towards the west. We can maybe see from this why the DPRK has some of the best and most intimate knowledge in the world when it comes to what the United States truly is. Which explains pretty well their support for Palestine (with the United States, by contrast, directly supporting the extermination of the Palestinians).
 
Also one point I want to make to all three of the most recent responders to my post. All three of you did something that I think is interesting: you pointed out your belief that the DPRK doesn't 'care' about Palestine. This I find pretty curious. Why does it matter whether they 'care' or not? They do, by the way, but even if they didn't, what does that have to do with the validity of the statement I posted?

Many people in this thread may care, abstractly, about Palestine. That is pretty cool I guess, but what really matters is whether you are doing anything of actual material benefit to support it. The DPRK has done that for a long time. They also have made a very good and correct statement about the conflict, which I posted. Some members find the statement objectionable, which is totally cool with me, but what is strange is that there's been no comment about any actual issue within the statement itself.
 
Extreme Illiberalism / "Anti-Establishment" truly is a brainrot be it MAGA/Fascism or the Marxist-Leninist kind, this kind of post reminds me about joining some "Marxist-Leninist" server back during the pandemic when i had no political home and was open for lots of "leftist" ideologies, i think it was called Yugopnik. Lets say the brainwash and idolizing of dictators, massmurders and autocrats was through the roof and those are the vibes you give since posting some manifesto of a islamist group uncritically.
 
for what it's worth, I don't mess with random leftist online communities or whatever things like that. I do mess with facts, many of which I've just now posted. you are free to sidestep them if you want, I can't control that.
 
Also one point I want to make to all three of the most recent responders to my post. All three of you did something that I think is interesting: you pointed out your belief that the DPRK doesn't 'care' about Palestine. This I find pretty curious. Why does it matter whether they 'care' or not? They do, by the way, but even if they didn't, what does that have to do with the validity of the statement I posted?

Many people in this thread may care, abstractly, about Palestine. That is pretty cool I guess, but what really matters is whether you are doing anything of actual material benefit to support it. The DPRK has done that for a long time. They also have made a very good and correct statement about the conflict, which I posted. Some members find the statement objectionable, which is totally cool with me, but what is strange is that there's been no comment about any actual issue within the statement itself.
If you must know, my foremost issue with the statement itself is the totally laughable notion of cutting the United States out of international relations entirely for its support of Israel; but as I explained in my prior response, I don't find the statement itself particularly noteworthy. Your intention in posting it, which you continue to be evasive about, is of significantly greater interest to me. I oppose both Israel's brutal treatment of the Palestinian people and my own government's handling of the situation, but I'm not going to throw my weight behind North Korea because they happen to be aligned with me in this regard.
 
I find interesting the whole idea that we can just say the words "North Korea" and it's supposed to simply end all conversation as a matter of course. Isn't that a bit odd?

If we're interested in my 'intent,' as if I had some sneaky ulterior motive in posting about North Korea (cue laughtrack because I said 'North Korea'), then I suppose it would be three things:

1) I thought the statement was really great and simply wanted to share it. I figured most would not appreciate it, but some might.
2) I saw that the thread was talking about some pointless things and felt that this would be more of a challenging or interesting topic.
3) I had a bad day today and posting for a bit here let me distract myself a bit from that!


---

I think if I keep going it will only get worse, so here is a very interesting documentary about the DPRK for anyone who wants to get an additional perspective on it. Learning is good! The director is iirc a South Korean German national. In my very 'evasive' opinion, it comes at the topic from a largely neutral perspective on the DPRK, with maybe a slight positive skew, which is very rare to see in the west. It is not a propaganda piece, in 'either' direction.

 
Last edited:
I find interesting the whole idea that we can just say the words "North Korea" and it's supposed to simply end all conversation as a matter of course. Isn't that a bit odd?

If we're interested in my 'intent,' as if I had some sneaky ulterior motive in posting about North Korea (cue laughtrack because I said 'North Korea'), then I suppose it would be three things:

1) I thought the statement was really great and simply wanted to share it. I figured most would not appreciate it, but some might.
2) I saw that the thread was talking about some pointless things and felt that this would be more of a challenging or interesting topic.
3) I had a bad day today and posting for a bit here let me distract myself a bit from that!


---

I think if I keep going it will only get worse, so here is a very interesting documentary about the DPRK for anyone who wants to get an additional perspective on it. Learning is good! The director is iirc a South Korean German national. In my very 'evasive' opinion, it comes at the topic from a largely neutral perspective on the DPRK, with maybe a slight positive skew, which is very rare to see in the west. It is not a propaganda piece, in 'either' direction.

I was in no way trying to end all conversation when I put the words "North Korea" in italics at the end of my previous post. I'm not sure where you've conjured that idea from.

I was suspicious of your motivation for posting the statement because I've recently been seeing a lot of leftists, out of either genuine authoritarian sentiment or blinding hatred of the United States, engage in apologetics for repressive autocracies. I believe you when you say that your intentions were more innocuous than that. Regardless, I'm not especially interested in what the North Korean government has to say on this matter, and the notion of booting the United States off the international stage over Israel remains utterly farcical. Therefore, this will be my last post on the matter. I hope that your next day is better than the previous one.

EDIT: Actually, I will say one more related thing: Without watching any of the linked documentary, I believe wholeheartedly that material conditions in North Korea aren't as overwhelmingly miserable as many in the United States media apparatus would have me believe. That doesn't change the fact that North Korea is a repressive autocracy to which I am fundamentally opposed.
 
Last edited:
why are you trying to let the republicans win 2028?
I’m pretty sure all his anguished comments that sound like an anguished leftist after the 2020 primaries are ironic— has to be. No way he’s serious… right?
yo but what if Trump stepped down?

think about it. the republicans have a guy that's doing quite well even though he has 34 charges against him. imagine if they just got a guy who had 0 charges. just someone who wasn't a criminal.

not to mention quite a lot of people watch his speeches, his debates, the way he carries himself and... kinda think he's just not mentally fit for office, you know?

damn, they'd probably be unbeatable if they did that.
If facing Biden unironically yes, the polls have pointed that a “normal Republican” would be much stronger. That’s why against that possibility too (extremely small now) Coconut Pill is our greatest defense.
 
Last edited:
Honestly, posting the opinions and statements of the most totalitarian and brutal dictatorship on this planet unironically and following it up with "idk I just think it's interesting" should be thread ban worthy. The above conversation just proves there's no good discussion to be had by doing so because everyone else is just as baffled as I am.

I'm not going to pull the trigger at this time because now we know what you're trying to do but jesus christ. At least make your point and give some context in your first post.
 
Honestly, posting the opinions and statements of the most totalitarian and brutal dictatorship on this planet unironically and following it up with "idk I just think it's interesting" should be thread ban worthy. The above conversation just proves there's no good discussion to be had by doing so because everyone else is just as baffled as I am.

I'm not going to pull the trigger at this time because now we know what you're trying to do but jesus christ. At least make your point and give some context in your first post.
I mean the user in question has unironically linked to Hamas pamphlets and told us that they were being misrepresented, not the first time this has happened
 
You think they sound like Republicans because you've convinced yourself that anyone that criticizes the Democratic Party must be a Republican.



Incumbency doesn't matter. There has never been an incumbent with this low approval rating.

What does matter is that two-thirds of Democrat voters want Biden to step down. Kamala polls even with Biden in head-to-heads against Trump and she isn't even running. Even Pelosi is making calls trying to get him to step aside (while Bernie and AOC flounder by trying to get Biden to support policies, making the mistake that policies matter in this election).

Still crazy to me that anyone could do the mental gymnastics needed to believe that Biden is able to turn this around, let alone feel smug enough to condescend to anyone who dares suggest that there may be better options.

Hahaha, are you serious right now? Biden doesn't need to "turn anything around", he's just gotta play it cool and not get baited by the hotheads at the DNC clamoring for him to resign. I mean who do you think can even replace him? Klobuchar? Don't make me laugh.
 
Meanwhile the UN-Court confirmed in a hearing that the annexion of West Bank and East-Jerusalem by Israel is illegal and that Israels practices against palestinian population violate article 3 of the international convention on the Elimination of All Forums of Racial Discrimination, constituting to Apartheid. Realistically this still won't have much truly negative effect for Israel and their current government as long as USA and most EU-Countries continue to unequivocally support Israel, but its still good to see this confirmation.
 
Hahaha, are you serious right now? Biden doesn't need to "turn anything around", he's just gotta play it cool and not get baited by the hotheads at the DNC clamoring for him to resign. I mean who do you think can even replace him? Klobuchar? Don't make me laugh.

It’s fantasy football. Build your dream ticket!

Never mind the 50 state Biden/Harris campaign apparatus, $250 million raised, and thousands of staff and volunteers working on the ground. Nah, we can just lay them all off and start over!
 
I thought we got over "north korea is the most evil country in the world they cook people alive and put them in little soups with carrots and tomatoes" discourse. The global north will always be infinitely more brutal, "authoritarian" and facist than a country that was almost bombed into extinction and is isolated from the world by the same global north and is actually a Normal Country with Normal People on it. destroy europe and the united states and then we can talk about north korea being problematic or whatever. maybe I'll even hear you out about china or something
 
North Korean concentration camps, authoritarian tendencies, extreme censorship / propaganda, and general crimes against humanity have been well documented by many, MANY numerous neutral sources, ex prisoners, NK refugees, former camp guards, satellite imagery and so on. North Korea being an authoritarian hellhole isn't up for debate. It's objective fact. You might as well tell me the holocaust "wasn't so bad" because that's the level of reality denial this North Korean revisionism is.

I was going to jokingly say you might as well quote North Korean state media to prove their innocence but I guess someone already unironically did that...
 
Last edited:
North Korean concentration camps, authoritarian tendencies, extreme censorship / propaganda, and general crimes against humanity

Man thats crazy, I wonder if theres a country out there who has that but 100x worse and is actively interested in imperialistic international politics that include genocide and complete destabilization of governments for its own benefit
 
I thought we got over "north korea is the most evil country in the world they cook people alive and put them in little soups with carrots and tomatoes" discourse. The global north will always be infinitely more brutal, "authoritarian" and facist than a country that was almost bombed into extinction and is isolated from the world by the same global north and is actually a Normal Country with Normal People on it. destroy europe and the united states and then we can talk about north korea being problematic or whatever. maybe I'll even hear you out about china or something


Yeah i know why i don't wanna interact with online communists anymore, come back when theres actually concentration like camps in todays western democracies (well might happen in USA soon enough the way things are going) and disobeying Kim Jong Un and his regime for the dumbest bs won't get you punished harshly. North Korea is isolated by its own fault or rather thanks to those 1940s - early 1950s Maoist "liberators" more than anything else.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top