First off, I'm stating my opinion. Second, I explained why I think the arms look inorganic. To reiterate that point, there is no transition from the red-green of the biceps to the dark brown. That isn't really the point here, but it's my thought. Third, I'm not the first to say it looks like it looks like Grovyle, and I probably won't be the last.
First off stating your opinion is cool, but ripping the artist while doing it is stupid. There is no transition? transition is needed for what. The burgundy arms with the wooden armor makes an appearance of a digmon i have still yet to witness. I never said you were the first to say it looks like Grovyle, but the other people who have said it, didn't make a rant about similar looking Pokemon, and didn't make a it a reason for their justification. Also i have only saw about 2 to 3 people, maybe even 4 compare it to Grovyle, and to be honest it doesn't even resemble Grovyle in anything but the head.
Yep, this. You hit the nail on the head. Don't worry about the rest of the artists, I can outdraw any of them any day of the week. It's just Elagune that's the real problem here. If I had my choice, he wouldn't be recognized for his artistic talent, because he's better than me and I can't stand it [/sarcasm]. Honestly, how incredibly retarded are you? You make a pretty good, albeit flame-ridden, about my personal biases, then kill everything by making a stupid comment like this. How dumb are you? I'm voting against Elagune's Woodman because I like Cartoons! art better.
First off, calling me dumb just puts the pressure on your desperateness. Not once while me replying your post i called you dumb. Calling me dumb doesn't even do a damn thing. The reason why i called your opinion biased is because you downgraded Elagune's woodman for the same reason we can downgrade Cartoons. So if they both can be downgraded for the same reason, but you're ranting about the only reasons why ELAGUNE's drawing is bad looks like what? Oh let me guess, it looks like a well justified complaint with plenty of original and stand out points/facts about the other persons horrible drawing. Obviously you can't pick and chose a point where its announces to the topic how much Cartoons drawing is better than Elagune's so
1. You attempt to flame him
2. You attempt to make weak points, which is why no one is agreeing with you.
3. You obviously show your envy by downgrading a work of art with if anything a rare and slim shot of having any flaws in it. Whole defending a messing looking deer, whose head is caught on fired and looks like it is covered in moss. That looks like a non-bias and non-envious complaint to me.
There were plenty of people who enjoyed Cartoons picture, even me. But we didn't go as far to say, yes Cartoons yours is great, Elagune's sucks. We all respect Cartoons guts for trying something different. But you can't knock the cliche of Elagune's picture because the artistic appearance of the photo is amazing. No offense to Cartoons, the picture just seemed a bit rushed and messy. That is my opinion, just like Cooper had is, but i can bet mine objection doesn't seem as offensive then Coopers.
Of course I made a biased comment. IT'S A POLL, AND I WAS DEFENDING MY CHOICE. WHY WOULD I NOT BE BIASED. What you're saying is if I want to remain unbiased, I can't vote and either must defend everything or nothing? Again, are you retarded? You claim that I'm an arrogant piece of bullshit, but my arrogant bullshitting can't come close to rivaling your preposterous nincompoopery. Clearly your dislike of me, coupled with your close relation to a mister Forrest Gump, has affected your posting, and I suggest that you kindly cut down on it for a while.
Why wouldn't you be bias? To get a better response from the crowd. If you maybe had some solid points with stiff justifications people would react to your feeling in a positive way. But instead, you attempted to gain some sort of publicity off insulting Elagune's photo and falsely doing it at that. Flaming someone to get attention in your objection is quite sad.
Also lastly lets get one thing strait. Your ban on me was actually because i wouldn't battle you. Yet i guess that is a perfectly great reason to ban someone. Then had to nerve to bring up irrelevant post from Aki trolling me, and me retaliating as your justification. That is the main reason, along with this crap you pulled just now for me thinking you're an asshole and you're bias.
I just want Cartoons to win more.
One last thing, this just shows how bias you are, and desperate. Mocking someone just because you want, CARTOONS, not the DEER, but CARTOONS to win more. lol, thanks for proving that to everyone.