np: OU Suspect Testing Round 2 - Who am I to break tradition?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lugia has never been tested in OU. There was a significant movement saying that he should be tested in OU at the beginning of the generation, but it was ignored. An actual test for him would be nice...

I agree. He may have been uber last generation, but we can't just assume that he'll be uber this generation as well. With attackers, it's different, because high base attack stats are pretty hard to ignore, but walls are different.

@kefka-Ho-oh is an attacker, not a wall, so it's a completely different situation with him.
 
I agree. He may have been uber last generation, but we can't just assume that he'll be uber this generation as well. With attackers, it's different, because high base attack stats are pretty hard to ignore, but walls are different.

@kefka-Ho-oh is an attacker, not a wall, so it's a completely different situation with him.

106/130/154 Defenses.
Along with Multi-Scale,Recover,good speed,and a ton of support moves.
He can just wall all day long T_T
Zekrom can't even OHKO it with Lightning Strike unless he has a LO.

@kefka-Ho-oh is an attacker, not a wall, so it's a completely different situation with him.

Ho-oh can wall too,he's just outclassed by Lugia in that regard.
154 Sp.def is nothing to laugh at.
 
What's the point? Any Uber that gets successfully nominated will never get more that 10% of the suspect vote. Also Lugia might as well be an attacker as it can run a Calm Mind/Roost/Aeroblast/filler moveset and still rape. Espescially since Roost means you aren't OHKOing and base 110 Speed (iirc) means you prbably aren't outspeeding.
 
106/130/154 Defenses.
Along with Multi-Scale,Recover,good speed,and a ton of support moves.
He can just wall all day long T_T
Zekrom can't even OHKO it with Lightning Strike unless he has a LO.



Ho-oh can wall too,he's just outclassed by Lugia in that regard.
154 Sp.def is nothing to laugh at.

With stealth rock in play, multi scale is useless.

Oh, and btw, cradily can wall him all day. With suction cups, whirlwind/dragon tail is useless. Throw in toxic, and he's crippled. Throw in worry seed, and he can't rest stall. Oh, and give him stockpile to make walling even easier. Problem solved.
 
So? Ho-oh is 4x weak to Stealth Rock and he could still wreck OU.
Do you even know how much bulk he has?

I remember reading the Ho-oh gen 4 thread where someone posted an offensive ev spread that could tank a +4 dark pulse from darkrai and ko it. This ho-oh was considered to be "offensive"

With stealth rock in play, multi scale is useless.

Oh, and btw, cradily can wall him all day. With suction cups, whirlwind/dragon tail is useless. Throw in toxic, and he's crippled. Throw in worry seed, and he can't rest stall. Oh, and give him stockpile to make walling even easier. Problem solved.

Yeah well, both water absorb Quagsire and shedinja completely wall Kyogre. Yet noone says Kyogre should go to ou. Just because one pokmeon walls a uber doesn't mean an uber should be ou.
 
With stealth rock in play, multi scale is useless.

Oh, and btw, cradily can wall him all day. With suction cups, whirlwind/dragon tail is useless. Throw in toxic, and he's crippled. Throw in worry seed, and he can't rest stall. Oh, and give him stockpile to make walling even easier. Problem solved.

Sacred Fire / Substitute / Brave Bird / Roost @ Life Orb, 232 HP / 252 Atk / 24 Speed, Adamant

Rest / Sleep Talk / Rock Slide / Toxic / Stockpile / Worry Seed @ Leftovers, 252 HP / 252 Def / 4 Sp. Def, Impish (yeah six moves)

Sacred Fire: 45.2% - 53.7% (50% burn rate!)
Sacred Fire vs. +1 Def: 30.3% - 36.2% (after eating at least one move first, also yay burn rate)
Brave Bird: 54.3% - 64.4% (clean 2HKO)
Brave Bird vs. +1 Def: 36.7% - 43.1% (after eating at least one move first)
Rock Slide: 73% - 85.6% (but Ho-oh will stall you out with Substitute+Pressure+Roost+miss)


Not gonna work.
 
Sacred Fire / Substitute / Brave Bird / Roost @ Life Orb, 232 HP / 252 Atk / 24 Speed, Adamant

Rest / Sleep Talk / Rock Slide / Toxic / Stockpile / Worry Seed @ Leftovers, 252 HP / 252 Def / 4 Sp. Def, Impish (yeah six moves)

Sacred Fire: 45.2% - 53.7% (50% burn rate!)
Sacred Fire vs. +1 Def: 30.3% - 36.2% (after eating at least one move first, also yay burn rate)
Brave Bird: 54.3% - 64.4% (clean 2HKO)
Brave Bird vs. +1 Def: 36.7% - 43.1% (after eating at least one move first)
Rock Slide: 73% - 85.6% (but Ho-oh will stall you out with Substitute+Pressure+Roost+miss)


Not gonna work.

He was talking about Lugia. Not that anyone's gonna use Cradily just to combat Lugia anyways.
 
Why is there even an argument about Ho-Oh being Uber? Shouldn't this thread be more about discussion about the current threats in the current metagame? With Manaphy gone what's breaking the game now? Rain still? Latios? Is Excadrill still even a threat? What about Garchomp and Salamence? They were uber last gen, but are they going to go back? What about Ferrothorn? His defenses, typing, support movepool, are absolutely superb and his offenses are great for a wall. And his ability? One of the best abilities for a physical wall. Reuniclus, Excadrill, Latios, Ferrothorn, Garchomp, these guys are all legitimate threats in the metagame, why not discuss them? I understand they've kinda been beaten dead already, but Ho-Oh is Uber, no doubt. So who cares?
 
edit: shiiiiiit I just bumped an argument


@SlimMan: ridiculing a suggestion is easy, but you haven't disproved me. Banning Manaphy+Surf combo wouldn't help the metagame, while banning Latios+DM would balance OU and keep another check to major threats around.

It was not ridiculing. It was serious. Since the only reason to ban DM is to keep Latios OU, I was asking why you are opposed to making all pokemon OU.

If you think banning moves to keep one pokemon OU is fine, why is it not fine on things like Manaphy or Skymin or Darkrai?

I'm asking you why you want it done on Latios and not everyone else.

----------
now for a real, non-bumping post

So I think Azumarill's value is going to go up. It's still a really niche pokemon, but without having as much rain offense to fuck it up, it should do better.
Dory and Landlos will be on every third team (prolly), and I bet Ulgamoth becomes a more legitimate threat without having so much rain.


And to finish this up: Reuniclus is not broken.
 
He was talking about Lugia. Not that anyone's gonna use Cradily just to combat Lugia anyways.

Oh of course, how silly I am...


...252 HP / 64 Def, Timid Lugia (Great Wall DPPt set) takes 43.8% - 51.9% damage from 252 Atk Careful Cradily's Stone Edge. Your best bet really is Toxic but of course, if Cradily (or any other defensive OU) can try to beat it with Restalk+Toxic, then Lugia could just go with Safeguard/Substitute...
 
The nature of a very offensive metagame somewhat lends itself to the introduction of more defensive pokemon. We *should* be more open to keeping up diversity, and minimalising bans. Banning in and of itself is quite an extreme action.

Ho-oH is monsterous with 130 at Sacred fire. However, rain is very popular currently. Lugia is also a monsterous stat up booster, however again there are plenty of pokemon that take a massive chunk out of its hp. Furthermore, in terms of strategy balance, walling is vastly inferior to offense in gen V. I wouldn't mind seeing a few more defensive ubers have a test.

Simple theorymoning, or showing how some "ubers" cannot be beaten in 1v1 situations, does nothing at all to prove a suspect as being broken. Admittadly perhaps, both legendaries are of high relative power, but flying, fire and physics are honestly some of the worst typings in OU currently. Overall, I'd like to be a bit more open minded about what can and can't be tested.
 
With stealth rock in play, multi scale is useless.

Spin support is not that hard to come by. Starmie, Doryuuzu, Tentacruel, Hitmontop, Forretress, and even Donphan can provide it quite well. And I think that, if it meant you could have Lugia or Ho-oh switching in scot-free every time, you could find room for it on your team.

Also, it's not like Stealth Rock is banned in Ubers or anything. Lugia still functions as a wall in Ubers and is capable of countering even Groudon. To get an idea, despite Groudon's 150 base attack, the Lugia set in the analysis still has a chance to live through a CB Stone Edge after SR damage, and proceed to start stalling it out of PP. And that's with just 64 def EVs and neutral nature.
 
Lugia is capable of outstalling even Zekrom in Ubers with a set of Reflect / Roost / Ice Beam / Whirlwind or Dragon Tail. Do you really want that kind of bulk in OU? To whoever said MultiScale is useless with rocks, lol. Lugia has the speed to just keep reactivating it with Recover, and Dragonite seems to get along just fine, too. Lugia will literally make the metagame consist of Tyranitar, because without the high-powered Thunders and Ice Beams of Ubers, you are not cracking Lugia with any other pokemon (and even CBTar can be outstalled lol).

Please can we stop discussing Ho-Oh? It is by no means manageable this gen as it got several boosts (Nitro Charge, Regeneration, a fighting-centric metagame, etc).

The nature of a very offensive metagame somewhat lends itself to the introduction of more defensive pokemon. We *should* be more open to keeping up diversity, and minimalising bans. Banning in and of itself is quite an extreme action.

Ho-oH is monsterous with 130 at Sacred fire. However, rain is very popular currently. Lugia is also a monsterous stat up booster, however again there are plenty of pokemon that take a massive chunk out of its hp. Furthermore, in terms of strategy balance, walling is vastly inferior to offense in gen V. I wouldn't mind seeing a few more defensive ubers have a test.

Simple theorymoning, or showing how some "ubers" cannot be beaten in 1v1 situations, does nothing at all to prove a suspect as being broken. Admittadly perhaps, both legendaries are of high relative power, but flying, fire and physics are honestly some of the worst typings in OU currently. Overall, I'd like to be a bit more open minded about what can and can't be tested.

Rain is currently popular because it isn't banned with SwSw yet. Once it is, I doubt it will remain up there. Not to mention that Brave Bird is one of the most broken things about Ho-Oh, as it demolishes would-be checks.

Flying and Psychic have gotten a big boost this gen what with the fighting-type running rampant. Flying has always been a great offensive type regardless as the few things that resist is are weak to fighting or ground. The metagame is simply not equipped to handle either of these two threats, and here's why.

Ho-Oh: "Checked" by water types, rock types, and electric types. There are VERY few water pokemon in OU that would be willing to take a STAB Brave Bird to the face; even Kyogre is reluctant as it is 2HKOd (and it has equivalent physical bulk to Swampert). Let's not forget that the prevalence of Nattorei, Birijion, and the actual existence of the the grass type is nothing more than a boon to Ho-Oh and a nerf to water-types. Rock pokemon are nowhere to be seen because they are weak to the most common types in the game, and are slow. The only one is Tyranitar, who fears a Sacred Fire burn on the switch and who is easily destroyed by LO Earthquake if it lacks a Scarf (which is tough to run this gen). Electric types, lol. They are rarely bulky enough to take a hit, and even Zapdos is 2HKOd by Adamant LO Sacred Fire. Face it, Ho-Oh is basically an extremely hard-hitting pokemon (hits harder than Jolly Garchomp's Outrage without the lock) with Swampert-like bulk on the physical side and Lugia-esque bulk on the special side. No.

Lugia: Lugia does not die. Ever. The standard set of Reflect / Roost / Dragon Tail / Ice Beam will revive full stall on its own, requiring nothing more than a few hazards to sweep your team while maintaining pristine health. Behind a Reflect, Zekrom and Groudon struggle to beat it, what makes you think Tyranitar will have it any better? That is literally its only OU check, as all the others are either unviable (Cradily in OU, really?) or simply can't do it. And before you bring up the "adapt to the pokemon around" argument, remember that it only applies when those pokemon can function outside of that specific niche.
 
Simple theorymoning, or showing how some "ubers" cannot be beaten in 1v1 situations, does nothing at all to prove a suspect as being broken. Admittadly perhaps, both legendaries are of high relative power, but flying, fire and physics are honestly some of the worst typings in OU currently. Overall, I'd like to be a bit more open minded about what can and can't be tested.

So you're saying ubers can be beaten with proper team support? In that case why not have a team that supports the uber in question?

Please can we stop discussing Ho-Oh? It is by no means manageable this gen as it got several boosts (Nitro Charge, Regeneration, a fighting-centric metagame, etc).

Seriously, there's more productive things to discuss.
 
Yeah I don't really know why a few people reckon Ho-oh and Lugia should go to OU.

Lugia is one of the greatest walls in the uber tier even checking Extremekiller Arceus (to an extent). The SR weakness is not too bad when you have Roost/Recover and heck you could always run a spinner. Lugia could run an offensive set like Sub/CM/Roost/Aeroblast or something which means statusing Lugia is out. Lugia can also go for the straight-ford route and Run Reflect/Roost/Whirlwind/Fillar. Heck It can even run a Sub Roost set (like Lugia) and stall out Stone Edges and want not.

Ho-oh is much the same. Not generally classed as a "wall" in Ubers it still is a bitch to take down. BB + Sacred Fire gets good coverage on most things and Sacred Fire has the bonus on a 50% Burn rate to deter physical attackers form switching in. So I guess that leaves Special attackers trying to break its 154 base Special Defence. Not to mention that Ho-oh gets a free switch in on Natt/Skamrory/Forretress (major hazard setters) can Sub up (forcing a switch) and then your Fire resist is facing a Ho-oh behind a sub ready to smash you with a Brave Bird. Running in tandom with something like Latios would just blast teams as Latios lures out steels that Ho-oh set sup on. Once the steels or down Latias can DM spam.

There is no way you can make a compelling argument that Lugia and Ho-oh are not Uber.
 
Spin support is not that hard to come by. Starmie, Doryuuzu, Tentacruel, Hitmontop, Forretress, and even Donphan can provide it quite well. And I think that, if it meant you could have Lugia or Ho-oh switching in scot-free every time, you could find room for it on your team.

Also, it's not like Stealth Rock is banned in Ubers or anything. Lugia still functions as a wall in Ubers and is capable of countering even Groudon. To get an idea, despite Groudon's 150 base attack, the Lugia set in the analysis still has a chance to live through a CB Stone Edge after SR damage, and proceed to start stalling it out of PP. And that's with just 64 def EVs and neutral nature.
I'd avoid uber analogies, because *if* lugia got into OU, it would almost definitely use a different set to it's famous 'the great wall' - which was specifically designed to take out Uber threats. In some ways, Lugia has a wonderful niche in Ubers for walling, with it's great speed. But, this does not necessarily mean it will have a similar niche in OU. I'd guess that the most popular/ effective set in OU would be 252sped/ 252 def bold calm mind + roost + 2 attacks or some variant. But the set almost depends on not being hit hard for a few turns. The set needs time to set up. Off the bat, 90/90 offense, whilst good, is no where near top OU. Lugia would serve a more counteracting role, which compliments a lot of teams. I think the lack of an instant threat would be what merits some argument for Lugia, more than anything. That seems to better contrast to the current pace of the metagame. Again, admittedly I'm a bit dubious of 130/154 defenses, along with a pretty solid movepool. But I wouldn't say Lugia is clearly Uber, like Kyorge may be.

Gah77 said:
So you're saying ubers can be beaten with proper team support? In that case why not have a team that supports the uber in question?
Almost every offensive strategy centres around something like " a late game sweep with Lucario" or "set up dual screen then DD with salamence to impose early pressure". Whatever the case, often people have an overaching plan about how to win, which often revoles around a few key pokemon, which are complimented by the rest of the team. In this case, how is supporting Lugia with X,Y or Z any different to supporting an SD lucario with W, X, or Y? How is eliminating team Lugia's spinner to keep SR up any different to elminating team Lucario's Latios which stops a Garchomp sweep? (specifics don't matter - they're for understanding's benefit.) It's not impossible to play around any strategy, unless the pokemon in question literally outspeeds and OHKOs everything immediately. Since as this is not the case, it's more a question when considering ubers of them generally being much, much more effective than anything else. Rather, thinking as pokemon more of 6v6 than a series of 1v1s, as everyone seems to think.

It's somewhat analogous to any strong OU pokemon - in a purely 1v1 metagame, we saw in Gen 4 that Salamence was notoriously hard to beat. In a purely 1v1 metagame that is, but this wasn't the case in the real metagame. Yes salamence was banned, but it did not win litterally every match it ever played. 1v1s are a horrid indicator of true effectivness.
 
The nature of a very offensive metagame somewhat lends itself to the introduction of more defensive pokemon. We *should* be more open to keeping up diversity, and minimalising bans. Banning in and of itself is quite an extreme action.

Ho-oH is monsterous with 130 at Sacred fire. However, rain is very popular currently. Lugia is also a monsterous stat up booster, however again there are plenty of pokemon that take a massive chunk out of its hp. Furthermore, in terms of strategy balance, walling is vastly inferior to offense in gen V. I wouldn't mind seeing a few more defensive ubers have a test.

Simple theorymoning, or showing how some "ubers" cannot be beaten in 1v1 situations, does nothing at all to prove a suspect as being broken. Admittadly perhaps, both legendaries are of high relative power, but flying, fire and physics are honestly some of the worst typings in OU currently. Overall, I'd like to be a bit more open minded about what can and can't be tested.

Psychic is nothing to write home about,but look at Mewtwo T_T
Typing alone shouldn't decide a mon's tier.

Max HP/Max Sp.def Ho-oh has a chance to survive Timid Specs Kingdra' Hydro Pump in the rain: 89.42% - 105.77%

A SE,240 BP Water move from 433 Sp.Attack(After Specs).

The standard Blissey takes: 76.47% - 90.20%

That's freaking ridiculous.
You can't tell me that they're not stupidly bulky.



My bad,had it as Super Effective.
Here's the real calc: 38.24% - 45.10%

Disregard my post.
Still,Ho-oh is quite bulky.
 
I'm pretty sure that banning Pokemon + move combinations will never happen.

You guys don't get what Aldaron's proposal is accomplishing.
 
Sacred Fire / Substitute / Brave Bird / Roost @ Life Orb, 232 HP / 252 Atk / 24 Speed, Adamant

Rest / Sleep Talk / Rock Slide / Toxic / Stockpile / Worry Seed @ Leftovers, 252 HP / 252 Def / 4 Sp. Def, Impish (yeah six moves)

Sacred Fire: 45.2% - 53.7% (50% burn rate!)
Sacred Fire vs. +1 Def: 30.3% - 36.2% (after eating at least one move first, also yay burn rate)
Brave Bird: 54.3% - 64.4% (clean 2HKO)
Brave Bird vs. +1 Def: 36.7% - 43.1% (after eating at least one move first)
Rock Slide: 73% - 85.6% (but Ho-oh will stall you out with Substitute+Pressure+Roost+miss)


Not gonna work.

This isn't about ho-oh. It's about lugia.
 
I'd avoid uber analogies, because *if* lugia got into OU, it would almost definitely use a different set to it's famous 'the great wall' - which was specifically designed to take out Uber threats. In some ways, Lugia has a wonderful niche in Ubers for walling, with it's great speed. But, this does not necessarily mean it will have a similar niche in OU. I'd guess that the most popular/ effective set in OU would be 252sped/ 252 def bold calm mind + roost + 2 attacks or some variant. But the set almost depends on not being hit hard for a few turns. The set needs time to set up. Off the bat, 90/90 offense, whilst good, is no where near top OU. Lugia would serve a more counteracting role, which compliments a lot of teams. I think the lack of an instant threat would be what merits some argument for Lugia, more than anything. That seems to better contrast to the current pace of the metagame. Again, admittedly I'm a bit dubious of 130/154 defenses, along with a pretty solid movepool. But I wouldn't say Lugia is clearly Uber, like Kyorge may be.

I've always wondered why people feel like an Uber must present an instant threat. Manaphy certainly does not, Deoxys-S certainly did not (Gen 4), etc. If you have to be able to 2HKO the best special wall in the game using a special attack for people to recognize Uberness, there is something wrong.

OU Lugia can afford to run less bulk given the power level, but it probably will continue to run speed as it allows it to check Garchomp, Terakion, and others.

Lugia@Leftovers
Timid; 252 HP / 16 SpA / 240 Spe

Roost
Reflect
Ice Beam
Dragon Tail

Not seeing much difference here when compared to the Uber spread. If it wants to it can run Multi Scale which acts as a double Reflect. It could probably use the same spread as a setup platform on top of that, to be honest. Roost / Calm Mind / Aeroblast / Earth Power hits alot.
 
Lets say, hypothetically, allow Ho-oh into OU. What could counter the nitrocharge or a sub set?

Kingdra doesn't get a swift swim boost thanks to Alderon's proposal and is outsped and KOed with BB.

T-tar is outsped and KOed with earthquake

Balloon heatran can wall it for one turn until its balloon breaks. Modest 252 SpAtk HP Rock from heatran does 65.7% - 78.2% on 4 hp ho-oh. And if Ho-oh decides to spam roost, HP Rock does 32.9% - 39.1%. So ho-oh could pop the balloon and attempt to outpredict the earth power then KO heatran.

Ho-oh is still walled by the top-tier walls such as Hippowdon and Porygon-2, but porygon-2 can't do shit do ho-oh and hippowdon still takes massive damage.

Quiet Frankly, everything about ho-oh except for ability is above average in OU standards. 106/90/154 are defenses a wall will kill for and 130/110/90 are all top tier. Sacred Fire and Brave Bird are all extremely powerful moves and Regeneration means that Ho-oh can switch into earthquakes and switch out for free healing if you can keep SR off the field, which is pretty easy if you're determined enough. If you combine all of them, you get something decidedly uber.

I've always wondered why people feel like an Uber must present an instant threat. Manaphy certainly does not, Deoxys-S certainly did not (Gen 4), etc. If you have to be able to 2HKO the best special wall in the game using a special attack for people to recognize Uberness, there is something

Well to be fair, there is a difference between cover legendaries such as Palkia and plain legendaries such as Latias. Already the "regular" legendaries such as deoxys-a, darkrai, manapy, and shaymin-s can easily take on the OU metagame. Other legendaries such as Jirachi and Azelf already have a top-tier position in OU. The only reason Cresselia was "bad" was because its two greatest counters, t-tar and scizor, just happened to be the most popular pokemon at the time.

If these legendaries already present such challenges for us, then obviously the cover legendaries would be even worse.
 
I've always wondered why people feel like an Uber must present an instant threat. Manaphy certainly does not, Deoxys-S certainly did not (Gen 4), etc. If you have to be able to 2HKO the best special wall in the game using a special attack for people to recognize Uberness, there is something wrong.
What you say is true. I was merely saying that the ubers that do present an immediate threat are much more likely to be thought of as Uber. Lugia certainly was uber in gen 4, yet it was no immediate threat.

It's very hard to prove anything uber by just posting a set or copy pasting some damage calculations. Manaphy and Deoxys-S do not look as good on paper comparitively to how effective they truly were (and are). That is why I favour a test, because no one can be truly certain of anything without one. There was a good bit of uncertainty about including lugia in the original ban list in the first place. I'm not saying test every uber, but I'm saying due to lugia's traits, it may be worthwhile testing. Whilst at the same time, due to Kyogre's traits, Kyorge may not.

i.e. My explanation was more about explaining reasoning for a test, rather than reasoning for tiering. It's different, because of how people preceive pokemon.
 
What you say is true. I was merely saying that the ubers that do present an immediate threat are much more likely to be thought of as Uber. Lugia certainly was uber in gen 4, yet it was no immediate threat.

It's very hard to prove anything uber by just posting a set or copy pasting some damage calculations. Manaphy and Deoxys-S do not look as good on paper comparitively to how effective they truly were (and are). That is why I favour a test, because no one can be truly certain of anything without one. There was a good bit of uncertainty about including lugia in the original ban list in the first place. I'm not saying test every uber, but I'm saying due to lugia's traits, it may be worthwhile testing. Whilst at the same time, due to Kyogre's traits, Kyorge may not.

i.e. My explanation was more about explaining reasoning for a test, rather than reasoning for tiering. It's different, because of how people preceive pokemon.

This is true, but calcs do have their value especially when combined with logic. The fact that there are so few things capable of taking on Ho-Oh is indicative of how prominent it will be in OU, especially looking at the metagame's current state.

As far as Lugia, its performance in Ubers DOES actually have an impact on its tiering, because it demonstrates just how bulky it is. Power creep or not, Ubers is an entirely different monster because things hit so damn hard. The fact that Lugia is capable of outstalling even STAB Supereffective hits from the highest offensive stats in the game is a testament to how difficult it is to take down in general, which is augmented in a metagame with much less attacking power.
 
Anyway,what does everyone think of Volcarona?
Fast,Specially bulky,powerful,and has one of the best boosting moves.

I've been using it since forever and while it is good, I don't think it is at the level where it should be banned. Depending on the coverage move, it is completely walled by Dragonite, Heatran, Salamence, or Terakion, along with some other pokemon I can't recall right now. A 4x SR weakness also bites, even though it can be worked around. Also, all of the common weather abusers can outspeed you after 1 BD, although that point is somewhat moot after the latest bans. +1 JOlly (TIMID I MEANT TIMID) Bug buzz also fail to KO a garchomp at max health, although jolly yache/haban garchomp needs stone edge to be able to guarantee a kill at max health. Scarf Landlos also outspeeds. I would consider volcarona to be top OU, not uber. Although I'm pretty sure it could perform pretty well there.

+1 Timid Bug Buzz manages to OHKO, though.

I agree, though. Volcarona, while good, is not on the broken level at all. It is capable of picking up several boosts relatively quickly, though, and the bulky set is generally most effective IMO.

I meant timid, just wasn't thinking. Probably since I use lefties instead of LO though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top