But that set sucks. It's just an attacking set that gets walled by all the same stuff bulk up conk does, but even MORE so;because it takes high amounts of residual damage and has no way of boosting attack, so you can just switch around and wait for it to DIE.
And btw, banning Garchomp for Sand Veil hax wasn't one of the smartest decisions made around here recently. If Garchomp gave your team that much trouble you should've ran Rain, or Sun, or an ice attack, or Sunny Day, you get the drift right?
Drain Punch everything not part Ghost and you should recover off the burn damage easily. It's not as good as Bulk Up but hey it can work unless you purposely want it to die.
Just saying, no set Blaziken can run seems really broken in OU now especially because the high usage of opposing weather. Blaziken has strong STABs, great. In about 16% of battles only one is relevant, in about 23-ish% percent of battles it's gotta survive residual damage, which it takes a lot of.
SR weak, hit by spikes, frail defenses to begin with, throw in LO and SS and you get the LOSS of a pokemon. It can be handled, it's not as if it 2HKOes the whole tier and you're forced to sit there and take it. And btw, banning Garchomp for Sand Veil hax wasn't one of the smartest decisions made around here recently. If Garchomp gave your team that much trouble you should've ran Rain, or Sun, or an ice attack, or Sunny Day, you get the drift right?
I don't think it can ever be that simple. That said, with our current process, we do need a more clear definition of an uber... I've been attempting to get this definition into use for some time:I think on the contrary that we need to re-define the definition of an Uber. For me it's the only way we have to be sure that no one complaint about the ban or not of a pokemon. If everyone (or a majority) agrees about the definition of Uber, we can't say anymore that the voters choose to ban something they don't like.
An uber is a Pokemon which, through offensive or defensive effectiveness, can reliably stay in and defeat a reasonably prepared opposing team, or a Pokemon which, through support capabilities, can reliably grant that characteristic to other Pokemon against a reasonably prepared opposing team.
Indeed... although there are other ways to address evasion directly rather than simply targeting its most prominent abuser.havent you heard the horror stories of losing to a garchomp because hp ice missed 4 times in a row
imo misshax has no place in competitive pokemon
Should not be discussed here, rather.Reminding people right now that this thread is not to discuss the brokenness of a Pokemon, Blaziken has been banned and its tiering should not be discussed.
What's a good Pokemon that can switch in to both Tyranitar and Politoed? Preferably one that learns sunny day. I want to take some pressure of my Ninetales by having a back up weather inducer.
I like using Chandelure against copy-pasta rain teams. Free wins right there. Yeah you heard... err... read me right. Using a fire type against rain.
Elaborate please
If you can't handle a weather with a weather team, you're not using it right.While we're on the subject of weather, I'd like to add that Drizzle has to be banned. Also, Jabba, when is the voting going to take place; I've got a nice team and want to ban Drizzle(:
Figured either that, or scarfed with shadow ball.
But why not f-blast the toxicroak?Dry skin makes it 50% weaker to fire after all.