May wanna take another look at that replay before ok'ing it: his opponent's Pokemon were all set to Level 50.
They were? I'm so sorry, I honestly didn't see that. Will remove and provide better replays soon, once again I'm sorry.
May wanna take another look at that replay before ok'ing it: his opponent's Pokemon were all set to Level 50.
Based upon further assessment, I rescind my approval. It /works/, but why would you use it.I'm genuinely disgusted by the fact that you honestly felt the need to provide us with that one atrocious log to make your case. If anything, that single-handedly destroyed any kind of potential Slurpuff had at being accepted for an OU analysis. To begin with, I have no idea why anyone would even bother using this thing over literally any other late-game sweeper and am curious as to why Jukain feels otherwise. Unless I'm provided with legitimate proof that Slurpuff is in fact a viable and effective Pokemon to use in OU in practice, I'm rejecting it without any further thought.
The only reasons to use Slowking over Slowbro isIf at all possible, I'll take Slowking. He plays very similar to my absolute favorite competitive poke this gen, Slowbro, and has an interesting niche in dragon tail support. (Why he gets Dtail and bro does not, I have no idea).
If I could have some help, though, with a TR set, I'm very much a stall player and, though I know the advantages of TR, I can't exactly justify a viable reason to run TR other than Slowking can probably beat TF 1v1.
Based upon further assessment, I rescind my approval. It /works/, but why would you use it.
Based upon further assessment, I rescind my approval. It /works/, but why would you use it.
It wasn't just that. I reassessed it, and deemed it unworthy. If you can provide good replays against good players, I/we will reconsider.
Ok, so I made a mistake with a replay and that automatically makes a Pokemon not worthy of an analysis?
It wasn't just that. I reassessed it, and deemed it unworthy. If you can provide good replays against good players, I/we will reconsider.
Can I reserve Ninjask?
I have positive experiences with SubCM, and definitely approve Raikou with that. AV, idk, but SubCM for sure. Practically 6-0ing those common Deoxys-D / Aegislash / Bisharp / Manaphy / Thundurus / Pinsir teams is particularly awesome (some variations obviously exist, but yeah).I have seen that Raikou doesn't get a analysis, but I think it deserve it. Assault Vest, 361 Speed (just great for that incredible offensive meta), decent typing and bulk that allows it to check m-pinsir, thundurus, manaphy, charizard-y, etc. and no more permanent sand, are few reason that make him viable; even though its base power of most of his moves has been nerfed. also iirc raikou was used in some spl matches, i know that's not a solid argument in anyway... but for the record only, and at least proves its not a terrifying pokemon.
i want to know what some qc opinions, but if qc members think i need to prove its viability w/ extenses arguments and replay i will do it.
Lucario's was taken down for quality reasons, and will be done by SDS. Probably waiting for the ban to start.Do threads purge here? For some reason, I can't find Lucario's analysis.
SubCM Raikou is definitely viable, don't know about AV though...