People should stop spreading bad rumors unless we completely eschew the existing spreadsheet and differentiate between Kalos-bred and non-Kalos parents. If people aren't prepared to do that then you should stop with the rumors and superstition. Isn't gathering empirical data the point of this thread? That's why I'm quite irritated that people are making claims with no real evidence to back it up, which runs completely contrary to the purpose of this thread.
I acknowledged that, but my anecdotal bias means nothing on its own regardless of when (or if) I hatch my shiny.
I think you should try to calm down a little. Its not really anything to argue about. Those of us who HAVE had bad luck were just noting something that we have in common. Whether or not you believe it is unimportant.
If it doesn't make a difference, then it doesn't make a difference and it won't affect this data, no?
Likewise, because people have pointed this out, another study thread has arisen. If the results from that study are similar to the results from this study, we will know that a non-kalos pokemon does not affect the rate. 0.o
Anyway, you shouldn't get irritated about something so silly. But if you're afraid that it will somehow skew the data, then that is something you SHOULD say and explain, of course. It is not your place, however, to tell people what they can and cannot discuss.
Anyway (and more importantly), my results thus far:
1~100: Nothing
101~200: Nothing
201~300: Nothing
301~400: Nothing
401~500: Nothing
501~600: Nothing
601~700: Nothing
701~800: Nothing
801~900: Nothing
901~1000: Nothing
1001~1100: Nothing
1101~1200: Nothing
1201~1300: Nothing
1301~1400: Nothing
1401~1500: Nothing
1501~1600: 1 Shiny
Parents were 6Iv Eevee and 6iv jpn Ditto until the 1500th egg. After this I switched out Ditto for a 6iv Italian Ambipom.
I'm going to take a break for a bit though and will hatch more eggs in the future.