I guess it's because Pokemon resembles more like natural wildlife?Sorry for bringing this conversation up again but I wanted to reply to this.
I've never understood why some people have such a huge problem with religious elements in Pokemon when the series is hardly the first RPG to incorporate those elements into its lore. Nearly every RPG does it, and most do it far more blatantly, like the Elder Scrolls series. Bethesda based the entire lore and backstory of that series off of real life religions and deities and they push it relentlessly. It's completely steeped into every fibre of the series, from the main quests to simple sidequests you can accidentally stumble upon, from the countless in game books detailing things like the creation of the universe and the beings involved in its inception to npcs whose entire purpose is to share some of that lore, like Heimskr standing in the middle of Whiterun and spreading the message of Talos
It's absolutely phenomenal and amazingly well done and Elder Scrolls players love it, I've literally heard no one complaining about it, but Gamefreak try something similar on a much, much, MUCH more smaller scale, in a very half arsed manner frankly, and you have people throwing tantrums over it. I remember when Arceus was first discovered after D/P came out and some people on the Serebii forums being in complete denial about the existence of a creator Pokemon, the meltdowns were glorious to behold.
If something as half arsed as Arceus causes such massive breakdowns in some people, then how the hell would they react to the sort of stuff regularly seen in the Elder Scroll games, or other RPG's for that matter? I genuinely cannot understand the rage and denial in some people, it makes no sense to me.
And suddenly you have some "God" Pokemon, which sounds rather different than natural wildlife, because it kind of feels too magic-ish.