At this point a vote for Knights is also a vote for Aubisio as a Whydon town flip confirms the n1 persuade to not be scum theatre
I claimed boi, get out of hereidk what you're talking about blazade.
also Jalmont Hitmonleet i put vt because you guys didn't claim yesterday please claim
I’ve made a lot of statements so you’ll have to be more specific. Although I probably won’t so :/Jalmont with this I think you have to explain your ealier statement
My guess is he means the comment where you were certain if a lack of persuade within the game. At least thats the question i want answered atm.I’ve made a lot of statements so you’ll have to be more specific. Although I probably won’t so :/
I'll start with the assumption that the persuader is scum because loltownpersuadeI'll do some more stuff tonight WRT this game but I feel like I need to reread the game now knowing Xnadroj's flip.
Texas what do you think about Knights? You say that a vote for Knights is a vote for Aubiscio given the persuade but.. can you explain it better?
Could you at least indicate whether or not the existence/non-existence of the persuade has the current or future capacity to implicate scumThere is no persuade in this game, yes, I still feel the same way.
Again, not elaborating on that point so let's just move on please?
I get where you make the connection, but I don't get why you think if they are both scum why they would both lie about the persuade. Like, what purpose would that serve?I'll start with the assumption that the persuader is scum because loltownpersuade
A lot of discussion in d2 was around whether or not a persuader role existed or whether it was a messenger role or what have you. Some of this was based around whether or not the persuade was faked and Aubisio was voting Whydon to give whydon town credit. However, now Whydon has flipped town and KoC is also claiming to have been persuaded. Thus, Aubisio and KoC's results become linked. If you are voting for KoC, believing he is scum, then by extension you believe that Aubisio also faked his result and must also be scum.
This gets much more interesting if Jalmont ever decides to claim his role given his assertion that a persuader doesn't exist
explain some reads dammit >_>EXPLAIN GODDAMIT
literally did this 4 pages ago. updated for relevance.Earlio - lean town. claim makes sense, they have been providing decent content. not totally certain though
Hitmonleet - null, we have a lot of vt
Jalmont - pushier than usual, but is moving discussion in the right direction. would REALLY like to learn more about persuade and have them claim. light town. a bit erratic today
3P1K - have not really played with before, so no meta to base off of. pushing right direction but not really doing anything else. too little attention on them. null
Former Hope - blazade really didn't sit right with me, but fh has made good responses to pressure. could be masterful scum play tho. town lean
Texas Cloverleaf - town
MoodyCloud - haven't really been looking at moody, would like to hear from them today
Prophylaxis - town
Haruno, Whydon, and Knights - one of these three is scum for sure. I think knights is good if texas gets neighborized. i trust whydon because persuade thing but idk what is happening with the results. Haruno could be being haruno or just scum.
knights is probably town and whydon is dead. haruno is probably scum but could just be haruno
apricity - has the right idea pushing the HWK thing, but seemingly too aggressive about it. just VERY frustrated, i guess. could be scum pushing REALLY hard for a lynch on one of them but still trying to seem towny cause of frustration. . probably town tho. but my reads are notoriously off.
Doubly confirming with Voyeur, Knights and Texas are (virtually) clearedConfirming neighbourizer