Go ahead and point out the exact paragraph where you realized that you misread me vs leet
thanks, now explain to me what information the paragraph you just quoted contains that isn’t not included in the paragraph I just quotedalso keeping vote on apricity still, waiting for him to answer leet
This is what you said.
What does this mean? Leet has finished asking me questions and I have answered all the questions he asked.
So what are you waiting for? I do not understand.
I'm gonna join Empoof here. Wait until this argument ends before drawing conclusions.
thanks, now explain to me what information the paragraph you just quoted contains that isn’t not included in the paragraph I just quoted
can you tell me what post you answered his questions, i probs missed them if you did
Do you want to answer these questions yourself? Replace the first with how you feel about me now that we’ve fought it out
You replied,also keeping vote on apricity still, waiting for him to answer leet
This is what you said.
What does this mean? Leet has finished asking me questions and I have answered all the questions he asked.
So what are you waiting for? I do not understand.
And got no answer. You say that at this time you still did not realize that you misread me vs leet. However, you then read the following paragraph I said,can you tell me what post you answered his questions, i probs missed them if you did
and claimed to realize that you now realize that you have made a mistake, namely that the conversation between leet and I had finished at the time that you made your post keeping your vote on me.i think the thing that pinged me the most on this is where he said that he was going to keep his vote on me for pressure until i answered leet's questions even though I think that it is clear that if there was even a cursory attempt to understand the conversation between me and leet that there was nothing left to say. it is fine to not read the thread but i think when people don't read the thread and then pretend to have done so and say that they are "keeping an eye on developments" it is posturing
Gaaah. Sthap. I was not saying I think hal was noob scum. I was saying that I felt like the tone in that post was very akin to noob scum tone.I'm not entirely certain how one gets the "Mafia Champion" thing below their name but this entire post seems... weird. I don't think apricity would be noob scum based on the fact they seem to have enough experience to be warranted a "Mafia Champion" though idk how that is distributed so this could be moot.
This seems like a weird thing to say given how easy it is to SR somebody who hasn't contributed all that much.
Let me repeat my last post for clarity because I think if a bystander understands this point then I don’t have to say anything else about viper.
You misread me vs leet at first and did not realize it. After you misread me vs leet this is what I said:
You replied,
And got no answer. You say that at this time you still did not realize that you misread me vs leet. However, you then read the following paragraph I said,
and claimed to realize that you now realize that you have made a mistake, namely that the conversation between leet and I had finished at the time that you made your post keeping your vote on me.
This is impossible. This is impossible, because there is no information that could have lead to this realization in post 437 that was not included in post 254. So you could not have realized after reading post 437 that you made a mistake, because you did not realize after reading post 254 that you made a mistake.
I want to be clear. I am not jumping on this so hard because I think it is important whether or not viper was reading the thread. Misreading thread is not scummy. What is INCREDIBLY scummy is forgetting your thought process during the game, because scum have to manufacture their thought process whereas town does not. When Viper says that he realized he made a mistake after reading 437, HE IS LYING, because post 437 and post 254 contain exactly the same amount of information pertaining to me vs leet.
This means that Viper is scum.
I love how Hitmonleet gets ever so slightly more spiteful when he's talking about me. These kind of emotions are just strengthening my read.
Let me repeat my last post for clarity because I think if a bystander understands this point then I don’t have to say anything else about viper.
You misread me vs leet at first and did not realize it. After you misread me vs leet this is what I said:
You replied,
And got no answer. You say that at this time you still did not realize that you misread me vs leet. However, you then read the following paragraph I said,
and claimed to realize that you now realize that you have made a mistake, namely that the conversation between leet and I had finished at the time that you made your post keeping your vote on me.
This is impossible. This is impossible, because there is no information that could have lead to this realization in post 437 that was not included in post 254. So you could not have realized after reading post 437 that you made a mistake, because you did not realize after reading post 254 that you made a mistake.
I want to be clear. I am not jumping on this so hard because I think it is important whether or not viper was reading the thread. Misreading thread is not scummy. What is INCREDIBLY scummy is forgetting your thought process during the game, because scum have to manufacture their thought process whereas town does not. When Viper says that he realized he made a mistake after reading 437, HE IS LYING, because post 437 and post 254 contain exactly the same amount of information pertaining to me vs leet.
This means that Viper is scum.
Still awaiting actual thoughts from CaffeineBoost since he's been waffling more than a Waffle House store
All I want put of you is an actual concrete thought, man. The least you could do is provide one with real and good reasoning.
Okay now I'm just irritated by you not even trying to develop discussion. Vote: CaffeineBoost stop being so shady boiAll I want put of you is an actual concrete thought, man. The least you could do is provide one with real and good reasoning.
Cool, so asking for good thoughts is an absolute failure. Nevermind, I'm not gonna even try here, it's going to be a real headache to squeeze anything out of this.
Mafia ... is a game played by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
WHY THE HECK IS IT YOU ONLY ACTUALLY MAKE THOUGHTS WHEN PEOPLE DIRECTLY SUSPECT YOU
You're painting things in a, frankly, absurd light. I'm unpleased because you've done nothing to generate discussion, not because of OMGUS. If that was the case, I'd be obsessed with getting rid of Asek right now. The reason I suspected you was after looking over your posts because of their comment on you (I'd be happy to grab the post number if you want).
Stop making up crappy and arrogant explanations that imply people only get ideas because of you, it's demeaning.
Sorry, #365 was a bit rude, I'm just annoyed atm. Gonna take a short break from this
Yay this is the kind of stuff I wanted you to actually start posting. Real stuff that has a meaning and isn't entirely flimsy.
Anyways, to tackle your logic here, I want to cite the fact that you never responded to my statement against your "RVS FoS", which didn't make much sense considering we had already left RVS by that point. It's relevant, because it helps to frame this. Because you never responded to my dispute of your FoS, I saw it as you purposefully ignoring it, thus making it really seem as if you weren't interested in creating discussion, and instead just wanting to point fingers and push people for flimsy reasons. My concrete request was because I wanted a sign that you had actively been trying to develop discussion, and, because of that ignorance 9f my response, invalidated the original FoS vote in my eyes. Thus, things rolled on from there, resulting in the current situation. I still don't like your posts (especially the casual implication near the end of your post on me), and I'm still parking my vote on you until I feel otherwise, but there's a bit of my logic.
Oh, so that was just your only thoughts on the game at that point? I doubt it, but at least it's an explanation. Do you actually have any thoughts on anyone else, or are we just going to keep up this little back and forth until one of us is dead?
Alright, answering now. Don't have much time rn tho, so will be brief.
Now, what about you, replacing the Apricity in the first q with me?
- I feel like you're pretty towny rn, tbh. You've been pretty aggressive, which tbh tends to be towny from my experience. You've also been playing well and creating discussion, and so I feel good about you being town rn.
- I feel good about Empoof, and I feel good about Texas, but less so on Texas. They've just been posting thoughts that I get and can understand from a town PoV.
- Frankly, atm Caffeine, for reasons stated earlier.
Your language in these posts shows a great amount of irritation towards me. I see it as quite antagonistic in tone actually. A common occurrence is
your frequent asking of whether I have an "actual thought" and it seems to me that you don't think of me as scum but more that you think I'm an idiot. There are bits in bold which to me seem either arrogant or undermining since you appear to be treating me as if I've never played this before. Regardless of what role you think I have, you're frustrated and fed up with me. You don't really have this tone with anybody else so I think these emotions may have risen from discomfort at my initial read. I do think that if you were town, you'd be a bit calmer about what was initially a not very confident read (not confident enough for a vote at the very least) and a bit more complacent after I voted for you providing my reasons.
I would go on further and add that maybe your "do you actually have any thoughts on anyone else" was an attempt to get me off you but I think that was more of a jab at me than anything.
Yeah, I was progressively getting more and more irritated by the fact that I wasn't getting a detailed statement from you on your thoughts other than the one post that I had responded to (and that you had ignored). The forth quote was to express that I was tired of trying to do that, and the eighth was an apology for being rude. The first was a joke based on Empoof's comment, and unrelated to your playing. The sixth was me reaching peak annoyance and the seventh was an honest, polite offer. The ninth was me expressing joy that my previous requests were answered, the tenth was me pointing out how you were pretty much deathtunneling me, and the last has no meaning at all in terms of tone. I don't think that you're an idiot, I just think that, previously, you hadn't been posting that much of original ideas and content. I'm sorry for making you think I thought you were stupid.
Tbh when this kind of scenario happens I tend to just have no chill. See: Invitational Mafia, where this kind of thing lasted nearly the whole game.
I am sorry about making you feel like I thought that way though, man.
I WILL HAVE YOUR SOUL; I HAD LIKE TWO PARAGRAPHS TYPED UP REGARDING THISholy i missread that so bad i thought it read "i think that lynchhopping is scummy" rather than "idt that lynchopping is scummy"
please dismiss my posts on rad
I WILL HAVE YOUR SOUL; I HAD LIKE TWO PARAGRAPHS TYPED UP REGARDING THIS
This was in response to:i really think you are over estimating my playing skill in that last paragraph.
i answered you earlier saying "when reading what you just quoted i did not see where you answered his questions " and that was the difference.
the first time, due to my fault, not any1 elses, i did not realize it
when it was restated i then realized it
Blatant misconstrewing of the arguement being made. There is nothing here regarding playskill in the slightest; its a fact of life scum need to create a thought process. How else would scum create reads. He pretty blatantly dodged the arguement at hand. And I actually want an answer for this; and you are going to tell me you misread again. And im not gonna buy it. So you better come up with something a bit better. ##Unvote asek (i think its asek; if not asek unvote whomever) ##Vote: ItzViperI want to be clear. I am not jumping on this so hard because I think it is important whether or not viper was reading the thread. Misreading thread is not scummy. What is INCREDIBLY scummy is forgetting your thought process during the game, because scum have to manufacture their thought process whereas town does not. When Viper says that he realized he made a mistake after reading 437, HE IS LYING, because post 437 and post 254 contain exactly the same amount of information pertaining to me vs leet.
Eh i'll get to it tonight.The thread made a universal decision to not read empoof this day phase
If Viper comes in and responds to my post and says that is the third thing within 36 hours he has misread do you believe that to be alignment indicitive?yeah sorry homie i'm siding with "he misread the first time and then read correctly the second time" when it comes to this
like he can be scummy for posturing and trying to be put in a good position vs scumhunting, sure that's fine. Not really seeing what you're trying to push in this post very well.
Which I know is bad since you'll just restate the post or whatever but I just disagree