"only other town protect" is reducing it to two. Unless you don't think Caff is a doc, you're obviously a town protect, there has to be three for last night to have happened.what
Sounds like you excluded yourself from town protects.
"only other town protect" is reducing it to two. Unless you don't think Caff is a doc, you're obviously a town protect, there has to be three for last night to have happened.what
"only other town protect" is reducing it to two. Unless you don't think Caff is a doc, you're obviously a town protect, there has to be three for last night to have happened.
Sounds like you excluded yourself from town protects.
how did you think I was angling it?oh nvm i see you're angling that
how did you think I was angling it?
Nono, I'm interestedeh there's not really a point if you don't want to listen to what i have to say anyway
im still not sure how any of the events point to me as conf scum cuz i feel like i've addressed them regardless
Nono, I'm interested
i would rather not sayTexas Cloverleaf Who did you target last night?
Okay.i would rather not say
I've responded to your posts. If you want a response to the wall, I'm not talking about the same time period you are and that's p clear. For your claim to make sense, there must be 2 roleblockers. It's technically possible the other one has fired on roles every night that weren't alerted that they were blocked, that much is true, but that's a huge hypothetical. It's much more logical and likely that you're the only roleblocker.everything is interesting to you, but you clearly aren't reading my posts
I've responded to your posts. If you want a response to the wall, I'm not talking about the same time period you are and that's p clear. For your claim to make sense, there must be 2 roleblockers. It's technically possible the other one has fired on roles every night that weren't alerted that they were blocked, that much is true, but that's a huge hypothetical. It's much more logical and likely that you're the only roleblocker.
ftr my role was psy. my ability allowed me to target two people, and those two could not target each other. i could target myself (but not consecutively) and i couldnt block myself
n1 i targeted hal/apricity and celever and that was the same night i was wiped so i never got to use it again
out of curiousity, who was wiped last night?
what does this meanryo is giving very much new rodan lowkey? can we speak on it
nothing important.what does this mean
Caff and I weren't told the wording of what happened i.e. that one kills another. We were told that if one of us dies while we're buddied, the other will too.Okay I'm trying to think of things mechanically and here's where I'm at.
From N2 interactions, we can assume that one of Celever/DLE/Drookez is a Strongman. DLE is a neigbourizer and I doubt they have both this ability and a strongman. That said, DLE could theoretically be scum Neighbourizer. I don't know. No idea how flavour would even work those two together. If anyone here spec'd Bigvivor then lmk.
We know that Clouds could double post N3. This means that Drookez motivator claim on N2 holds. If Drookez really is a JOAT, even a mafia JOAT with 1S*-Strongman, then they shouldn't be able to use both on one night.
Given that Celever has (to my knowledge) idled N1, 2, & 3 and was supposedly blocked N4, we have 0 confirmation that this claim is true. Given this with the above reasoning, Celever is mechanically likely to be a strongman. Even nights if I had to guess.
An issue arises with the fact that Celever is still alive. If Clouds and Celever were cupid targets, then something must have happened to stop Celever from dying. I propose two theories:
I am more keen on theory 2, though I'd like to point out that this theory doesn't determine the truth of Nuxl's claims.
- Nuxl isn't lying about their JK and roleblocking Clouds negated the lovers clause through some weird semantics.
- Mafia has a doctor and they used it on Celever so they could kill Clouds without having to worry about the loss of a teammate.
shadowpea Please confirm with Dusk whether Clouds and Dyo are still lovers in your role PM with Dusk.
Duskfall98 Just in case it comes up earlier.
Hypothetically if Flare's role PM is identical to Amilda's, Amilda dies, then someone uses Amilda's role while Flare uses their inherited role. Then if they target the following people
Stolen amilda role: Person A
Flare: Persons B and C
If someone targets Person A, assuming there are no redirects or roleblocks, who are they on now? Same question for if someone targets Person B.
Why does something targeting person B get blocked but not if it targets person C?Assuming it was exactly identical to the flipped alimdia (Haruno) role, it would attempt to redirect B to both A and C. According to op mechanics double redirect = block, therefore anything targetting B is blocked. A and C would redirect to B like normal.
I'm guessing I should swap the letters A and B in this explanation since that would make sense.Assuming it was exactly identical to the flipped alimdia (Haruno) role, it would attempt to redirect B to both A and C. According to op mechanics double redirect = block, therefore anything targetting B is blocked. A and C would redirect to B like normal.
maybe? i think itd be funny if we actually ended up voting ryo but id say that the inconsistency of clearing nk targets (not wiping hal but wiping haruno) makes this slightly strange to me. especially since what is the benefit of confirming texas with harunos role if ryo is scum who knows texas is town?All I'm thinking now is the far-out that Ryo is role wiper and gets the roles of the people he wiped. N2 wipe target never claimed; I thought it was Ayia, but it could have been Haruno.