i think a lot of people are getting the wrong takeaway from the punishment too.idt the issue is what the guy did it's more the fucked-up punishment they've given him. that shit's not on (<--------is going to sort it out personally)
Some people see "10 million" and "paying for the rest of his life" and stop there, and I agree both of these things are bad, but it's easy to misunderstand the details.
Google says the Canadian median income is about 40K CAD, the median Canadian retirement age is about 65, and that welfare does not count as gross income for this purpose. Bowser is 53. Assuming all that is true, and Bowser makes a median income until he retires at a median age, he will pay Nintendo about $120,000 to $150,000 CAD total, much less than you might think when you first see the punishment.
Again, this is not a good thing. Non-wealthy individuals should not be paying tens of thousands for the rest of their working life for IP violations. But the full picture is important. This outcome (not the 10M, the 100-ish K CAD that one could expect he'll actually pay) is very lenient compared to other outcomes in the U.S. justice system, the finance industry, and corporate litigation. Bowser isn't spending years in a cage for smoking weed, he's not being eternally harassed by debt collectors for 200K in faultless medical debt with interest, and he's not, well, I'll just link this list of everything McDonald's did in that one coffee case (besides the vicious propaganda to frame it as a frivolous suit, which isn't mentioned).
If this is people's wakeup call that Nintendo is a megacorp and not their Cute Funny Mario Animal Crossing Villager Friend, great, but I wish some discourse around this incident flowed more into "the US legal and financial systems are inhumanly penal, and the dystopian idea of eternal payment even if that's slightly better suited for debt narratives than this is an example" and not just "Nintendo is terrible".