Metagame SV OU Metagame Discussion v3

Status
Not open for further replies.
Is Calm Mind Blissey actually good rn or are a bunch of people in 13-1400 smoking the gen 4 crack?
is to help her support herself against special boosting threads, most common one being gholdengo, but valiant is a nice bonus too, smart people use to basically stall, if your not smart, you can use attacking moves on it like ice beam to lure gliscor while he puts 3 layers on the field
 
Is Calm Mind Blissey actually good rn or are a bunch of people in 13-1400 smoking the gen 4 crack?
It's mainly used to deal with Gholdengo in Stall teams, plus a bunch of special set up sweepers (hence why they all run Tera Dark, to counter an eventual Stored Power or Psyshock). The problem with Blissey is that it literally does nothing besides that set, you always see it with the same movepool of Stealth Rock, CM+Shadow Ball/Hyper Voice and Soft Boiled as a last move. Since it no longer gets Toxic you really can't do anything with Blissey unless you use an offensive set, so this is the only option for the Stall players that still want to use it in their teams as a Special wall. I mean, it also has Heal Bell but it is pretty much a useless move outside of Gliscor's Toxic spam. For this reason Blissey only works on Stall teams, and I'd argue it's one of their least threatening and least annoying mons as well. I hope it stays that way even after the DLC.
 
It's mainly used to deal with Gholdengo in Stall teams, plus a bunch of special set up sweepers (hence why they all run Tera Dark, to counter an eventual Stored Power or Psyshock). The problem with Blissey is that it literally does nothing besides that set, you always see it with the same movepool of Stealth Rock, CM+Shadow Ball/Hyper Voice and Soft Boiled as a last move. Since it no longer gets Toxic you really can't do anything with Blissey unless you use an offensive set, so this is the only option for the Stall players that still want to use it in their teams as a Special wall. I mean, it also has Heal Bell but it is pretty much a useless move outside of Gliscor's Toxic spam. For this reason Blissey only works on Stall teams, and I'd argue it's one of their least threatening and least annoying mons as well. I hope it stays that way even after the DLC.
Blissey being good is only fun in a format like gen 3 OU, and even then double blissey end games are the single worst part of that metagame
 
Is Calm Mind Blissey actually good rn or are a bunch of people in 13-1400 smoking the gen 4 crack?
It is necessary on Stall, you need to be able to deal with special threats that set up - others have mentioned Gholdengo and that is the #1 application, it also helps a lot with Iron Moth, as well as CM Valiant if you're certain it doesn't have Close Combat


It's mainly used to deal with Gholdengo in Stall teams, plus a bunch of special set up sweepers (hence why they all run Tera Dark, to counter an eventual Stored Power or Psyshock). The problem with Blissey is that it literally does nothing besides that set, you always see it with the same movepool of Stealth Rock, CM+Shadow Ball/Hyper Voice and Soft Boiled as a last move. Since it no longer gets Toxic you really can't do anything with Blissey unless you use an offensive set, so this is the only option for the Stall players that still want to use it in their teams as a Special wall. I mean, it also has Heal Bell but it is pretty much a useless move outside of Gliscor's Toxic spam. For this reason Blissey only works on Stall teams, and I'd argue it's one of their least threatening and least annoying mons as well. I hope it stays that way even after the DLC.

This would be a nice change if Gholdengo were to be banned, although I don't think the hazard dynamic would change much, Blissey would be able to run Seismic Toss again, which makes progress so much quicker than Shadow Ball
 
It is necessary on Stall, you need to be able to deal with special threats that set up - others have mentioned Gholdengo and that is the #1 application, it also helps a lot with Iron Moth, as well as CM Valiant if you're certain it doesn't have Close Combat
I feel like CM Valiant *has* to run vacuum wave to not get owned by kingambit. (why is that mon allowed in the tier btw?)
 
Is Calm Mind Blissey actually good rn or are a bunch of people in 13-1400 smoking the gen 4 crack?
it can beat nasty plot gholdengo with flamethrower as its second attack and can even beat crit me not manaphy sets with tera dark so stored power doesn’t nuke it, blissey is kinda mid right now, but calm mind blobsey is more than some midladder menace set used to steal games
 
I feel like I really wanna ban Gholdengo due to its overpowered ability and warping presence in the meta, but at the same time I cannot stop pondering over how good this mon functions as glue during teambuilding. Ghost/Steel is an incredibly good typing that covers a significant amount of weaknesses in many teams, and with Dengo's more than solid stats it really shines as a defensive answer to the many threats we currently have in this meta. Ability aside, Gholdengo has an amazing movepool and stat distribution that allow it to run multiple sets effectively, and it would be a well-rounded and well-designed mon if it wasn't for Good as Gold. I wonder how problematic mons like Valiant, Sneasler and Zamazenta will get once we ban what is probably their greatest check. I know that "broken checks broken" isn't a good solution at all, but this is just food for thoughts. I won't hide the fact that I run Gholdengo in most of my teams simply because of how easy it is to use for both offense and support, and I'll definitely have to find an alternative for it.
That’s the main part of its problem though. It’s not only just a great OU Pokémon (even without Good As Gold), but it also has Good As Gold on top of its existing good qualities. It’s not like Game Freak slapped Good As Gold on some Steel/Normal shitmon that might occasionally show up in matches, they deliberately put it on something great. And because of how most of the tier uses the thing, it creates an unhealthy environment where people just treat hazard removal as an afterthought since your opponent might not even be running Gholdengo solely for its Defog/Rapid Spin blocking, but because it’s so easy to just slot into any kind of team, and therefore just let hazard-spam be a thing (or start clamouring for every half-decent Spikes user to be banned, or for Spikes themselves to be banned). Which ends up creating a recency bias of people saying solid Pokémon like Corviknight suck since they simply haven’t seen it operate in a stable, Gholdengo-less metagame. And if Valiant/Sneasler/Zamazenta turn out to be broken without Gholdengo around, then just ban those things too. It’s better to have an actually fun metagame to play than the same shit we’ve had for almost a year just cause “oh, one of the brokens can be a glue mon to help against the other brokens!”.
 
kingambit is the single most banworthy pokemon in the tier and is the exception to the efficacy of the suspecting process. Kingambit should have been survey banned
i think the most banworthy mon in the tier right now is, well, the thing that's being suspected, but gambit isn't too far behind. and yes, in a perfect world it would've been quickbanned ages ago because we're all fucking sick of it, but between some malicious people spamming the surveys and the general shift in public opinion towards taking care of the hazard meta first, it seems like gambit might survive into dlc2 and we'll have to wait even longer before we can play matches that have a real endgame
 
And if Valiant/Sneasler/Zamazenta turn out to be broken without Gholdengo around, then just ban those things too. It’s better to have an actually fun metagame to play than the same shit we’ve had for almost a year just cause “oh, one of the brokens can be a glue mon to help against the other brokens!”.
Sneasler is broken even with Gholdengo and I'm tired of you people pretending it's not. Seedler (Grassy Seed Sneasler) is the single most brain dead "I win" button in the tier, with maybe the exception of ddance tera normal dragonite. Burning your tera on a Seedler when you have the unburden boost is almost always a good decision, and quite often you can get a free swords dance. Yes Great Tusk can hit you in both forms, but they have to predict correctly and you're always getting an SD off. You can just SD in front of gliscor in grassy terrain without teraing and then you click the "I win" button. You slot in night slash for ghold so that's not even a check. The only flaw of seedler is that it cannot break stall teams by itself, but guess what! You have 5 other teammates that can help with that. The only things tiered in OU that can stop a seedler sweep are kingambit or dragonite, because there is no other good priority in the tier. This isn't even mentioning the uncompetitiveness inherent in dire claw, or the quite good support set that doesn't get talked about because it doesn't win the game instantly. Every single time I get a sneasler sweep, or even just break a team into pieces with it, I think "why is this thing allowed in the tier". Seedler is gen 7 Hawlucha on steroids, because often times you don't need to SD to break a team apart. Defensive tera is a good idea in theory, but if seedler survives the hit, you're screwed. I'm so genuinely tired of seeing Rillaboom + Sneasler on the other team and praying I win a speed tie. It's the exact opposite of a double blissey end game in ADV OU and it's just as bad.
 
i think the most banworthy mon in the tier right now is, well, the thing that's being suspected, but gambit isn't too far behind. and yes, in a perfect world it would've been quickbanned ages ago because we're all fucking sick of it, but between some malicious people spamming the surveys and the general shift in public opinion towards taking care of the hazard meta first, it seems like gambit might survive into dlc2 and we'll have to wait even longer before we can play matches that have a real endgame
Gliscor should not get banned for the sins of Gholdengo.
 
Gliscor should not get banned for the sins of Gholdengo.

Gliscor's oppresiveness isn't solely due to Gholdengo, I feel like if you believe this you're actively ignoring how the meta's developped recently or are stuck in low ladder hell and have never fought a competent Gliscor team.

Gholdengo is nowhere near being Gliscor's most common partner, which is unsuprisingly Clefable, due to the fact that they both mesh together as bulky hazard setters that are immune to hazards (-rocks for gliscor.)

1699377287820.png


Most of these "Iron Man" squads show just how insane an immunity to hazards is for stalling out the game. Gliscor is as good as it is right now because not only does it have spikes immunity, spikes, rocks, toxic and knock, all of which are insane for a defensive pokemon to have, but also a double leftovers that isn't reliant on having it's item is just insane.
 
i think the most banworthy mon in the tier right now is, well, the thing that's being suspected, but gambit isn't too far behind. and yes, in a perfect world it would've been quickbanned ages ago because we're all fucking sick of it, but between some malicious people spamming the surveys and the general shift in public opinion towards taking care of the hazard meta first, it seems like gambit might survive into dlc2 and we'll have to wait even longer before we can play matches that have a real endgame
Do you have evidence that the people giving low survey scores to Kingambit are "malicious people?" Seems awfully strange to accuse some grand conspiracy of being afoot when 1) we have evidence of fraudulent votes rating Kingambit 5, not the other way around and 2) the qualified playerbase seems to think Kingambit is much less of an issue than the unqualified
 
I kinda don’t give a fricking frick about gliscor, i don’t use it and im in midladder anyways, most midladder players are too obsessed with zapdos to properly spam gliscor so i haven’t faced it in nearly a week, if it gets banned, it gets banned, if it stays, it stays, im rather neutral to gliscor, gholdengo should be next though

p.s skeledirge is b+ in ou, uu and ubers
 
Last edited:
Do you have evidence that the people giving low survey scores to Kingambit are "malicious people?" Seems awfully strange to accuse some grand conspiracy of being afoot when 1) we have evidence of fraudulent votes rating Kingambit 5, not the other way around and 2) the qualified playerbase seems to think Kingambit is much less of an issue than the unqualified
the fraudulent votes rating gambit a 5 were what i was talking about. tampering with the survey casts doubt on the results, which slows down the process and makes it riskier to take quick action, so the people spamming votes for kingambit are actually delaying action on kingambit. not sure why you keep trying to accuse me of being a conspiracy theorist
 
Midgambit was voted to stay by the qualified playerbase, and is less reliable now than its ever been

I disagree, i feel like Kingambit greatly benefits from the hazard meta and to some extent the ban of RMoon.
The only reason you feel Kingambit is "less" reliable is because everyone is incredibly hellbent in having multiple checks to Gambit because of how threating and centralizing it is. Encore usage and other cheese antigambit mechanics are at an all time high due to this, and even then thanks to Supreme Overlord, Sucker Punch and Tera every now and then it gets lose and carries/saves a game.
It sits at 40% usage for a reason...
 
The player base is a bunch of thundering dumbasses this gen. A lot of problems are getting ignored or justified for awful reasons. Such as one of the big anti-ban reason on kingambit being it checks the whole format. Most of the reasons why it was kept were awful. The main anti-ban reasons were 'we need it to check other broken stuff' and 'you can 50/50 it with tera'.

I honestly don't care about kingambit one way or another, it's not as good as it was, but pretending like it getting voted to stay means something is kind of moot. The qualified voter base is largely punting on anything that it's a 100% slam dunk of a ban. And once broken stuff gets bumped off, it's probably going to show back up.

These are the kind of generations that make you believe democracy was a mistake and it's time for fascism.

Did you get reqs?

Btw unrelated I know but it is in fact never "time for fascism"

I disagree, i feel like Kingambit greatly benefits from the hazard meta and to some extent the ban of RMoon.
The only reason you feel Kingambit is "less" reliable is because everyone is incredibly hellbent in having multiple checks to Gambit because of how threating and centralizing it is. Encore usage and other cheese antigambit mechanics are at an all time high due to this, and even then thanks to Supreme Overlord, Sucker Punch and Tera every now and then it gets lose and carries/saves a game.
It sits at 40% usage for a reason...

I disagree that Kingambit benefits from taking 25% when it enters or having to give up Leftovers/Lum, and also that it benefit from the ban of a Pokémon it checks. I disagree that Encore is "cheese" and just "anti gambit," and with the idea that it is an unreasonable means to check gambit, when it is one of the most reliable features in the meta for disrupting stall and balance and enabling setup sweeping. Obviously "midgambit" is hyperbole but I don't feel this Pokémon is a problem at all at this point
 
Last edited:
Sneasler is broken even with Gholdengo and I'm tired of you people pretending it's not. Seedler (Grassy Seed Sneasler) is the single most brain dead "I win" button in the tier, with maybe the exception of ddance tera normal dragonite. Burning your tera on a Seedler when you have the unburden boost is almost always a good decision, and quite often you can get a free swords dance. Yes Great Tusk can hit you in both forms, but they have to predict correctly and you're always getting an SD off. You can just SD in front of gliscor in grassy terrain without teraing and then you click the "I win" button. You slot in night slash for ghold so that's not even a check. The only flaw of seedler is that it cannot break stall teams by itself, but guess what! You have 5 other teammates that can help with that. The only things tiered in OU that can stop a seedler sweep are kingambit or dragonite, because there is no other good priority in the tier. This isn't even mentioning the uncompetitiveness inherent in dire claw, or the quite good support set that doesn't get talked about because it doesn't win the game instantly. Every single time I get a sneasler sweep, or even just break a team into pieces with it, I think "why is this thing allowed in the tier". Seedler is gen 7 Hawlucha on steroids, because often times you don't need to SD to break a team apart. Defensive tera is a good idea in theory, but if seedler survives the hit, you're screwed. I'm so genuinely tired of seeing Rillaboom + Sneasler on the other team and praying I win a speed tie. It's the exact opposite of a double blissey end game in ADV OU and it's just as bad.
Oh I definitely do agree that Grassy Sneasler is braindead. I’m just saying
 
Did you get reqs?

Btw unrelated I know but it is in fact never "time for fascism"

Sometimes. Not often but sometimes. And the ones I got reqs for I was so uninvested in the result I didn't even bother voting. I got an account to reqs for Kingambit suspect then decided I was so ambivalent about the result because it didn't ultimately matter that I didn't bother voting. Even if it got banned, it was just going to be unbanned when the DLC dropped and it wasn't the issue with the format, so I didn't bother.
 
The player base is a bunch of thundering dumbasses this gen. A lot of problems are getting ignored or justified for awful reasons. Such as one of the big anti-ban reason on kingambit being it checks the whole format. Most of the reasons why it was kept were awful. The main anti-ban reasons were 'we need it to check other broken stuff' and 'you can 50/50 it with tera'.

I honestly don't care about kingambit one way or another, it's not as good as it was, but pretending like it getting voted to stay means something is kind of moot. The qualified voter base is largely punting on anything that it's a 100% slam dunk of a ban. And once broken stuff gets bumped off, it's probably going to show back up.

These are the kind of generations that make you believe democracy was a mistake and it's time for fascism.
listen, i hate gambit as much as the next guy and i think it should have been banned (and so do plenty of the dnb voters) but calling the playerbase "a bunch of thundering dumbasses" is going too far. and as much as i hate gambit, i hate fascists infinitely more, so if you're gonna parade around an opinion like that you better stay your ass away from my territory
 
Sometimes. Not often but sometimes. And the ones I got reqs for I was so uninvested in the result I didn't even bother voting. I got an account to reqs for Kingambit suspect then decided I was so ambivalent about the result because it didn't ultimately matter that I didn't bother voting. Even if it got banned, it was just going to be unbanned when the DLC dropped and it wasn't the issue with the format, so I didn't bother.

So you totally got reqs and did not ever post in any voter identification thread or ever vote in a suspect, and call other players "thundering dumbasses" because they didn't vote for the result you wanted? When you also, if this is true, did not vote for the result you wanted? If this is true, what exactly did you expect? Assuming that this is true of course.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top