The wilmer incident was an isolated case; however, NWO's attitude problems were not limited to just that one episode, in contrast to Ice-Eyes's situation. You are, of course, correct in saying that Ice-Eyes should not have done that. I think, however, Molk's idiocy somewhat justifies Ice-Eye's actions -- not completely, but to the extent that he should not be denied Tiering Contributor. And regardless of whether lambasting someone as Ice-Eyes did is ever acceptable or not, I believe there is a distinction between attacking a random person and attacking someone who has shown time and time again that he refuses to listen to reason, and I believe that it is necessary to discriminate between the two cases when deciding what to do about it.