i was liking jalmont until he advocated for lynching inactives and now i dont have a confident read anymore
that's not what i said so reread the post
i was liking jalmont until he advocated for lynching inactives and now i dont have a confident read anymore
that's not what i said so reread the post
I wouldn't ever ask you to be anyone but yourself. But sometimes situations necessitate taking risks outside your comfort zone. Maybe you can do that without sacrificing the very essence of who you are...
also Clarinet old buddy old pal can you please edit your account so I can iso you later on
duly notedin this interest of hopefully stirring up discussion i'll somewhat oblige i guess.
I expect certain players to act a certain way as one alignment and slightly differently as the other alignment. for some players i think they do a better job of staying consistent in their "town range" so to speak at the beginning but become more "obvious" as the game goes and as their reads start becoming inconsistent/not making sense. other players are more inconsistent in the sense that whether consciously or unconsciously they do something different because they have game knowledge that they know they must have.
Other times I look at the decisions people make and decide if those decisions and behaviors make sense in the context of the game and in terms of win condition. For the last game I would say that more or less m2h's play didn't make sense for me in terms of trying to advance a town win condition.
i hope i didnt give too much away xd
Hmwe are not giving hal president no