seconding this. the meta is unplayable and miserable to even think aboutI don't like ADV UU with Kangaskhan, we should give it a suspect testing window this ADVPL because I've expressed my dislike for it, thanks
seconding this. the meta is unplayable and miserable to even think aboutI don't like ADV UU with Kangaskhan, we should give it a suspect testing window this ADVPL because I've expressed my dislike for it, thanks
I don't like ADV UU with Kangaskhan, we should give it a suspect testing window this ADVPL because I've expressed my dislike for it, thanks
You do realize you can say "hey i dont think we should do glalieless" without blatantly tier bashing right?seconding this. the meta is unplayable and miserable to even think about
the last thing adv draft needs rn is smogon touching it. even if it was a good fit for adv draft, eo is happening soon so you would lose a ton of the best adv draft players.I would like to suggest ADV Draft to be added
It is one of the most popular draft tiers that gets played and draft has yet to be tried out in a team tour
Building a draft team with your ADV PL teammates would go hard and it encourages team work
Would be a cool experiment to try it out in ADVPL at least once
I do not believe it makes sense to choose which tiers to feature based on how much you or a couple high level players feel about them. What should matter is if they are being actively played and their community shows interest in the tournament. Going "Can Ubers because SEA said it's bad" is frankly insulting to the ADV Ubers player base, as an example.I suggest the format
ADV OU x6/8
BO3 OU
ADV UU
I have multiple issues with most lower tiers and would not like to see anything past UU included, and having played NU, PU, ZU pretty extensively, I think I have the background to back up my opinions on at least several of them. The ADV NU playerbase is clearly uninterested in changing their tier for the better, allowing the ridiculous Glalie and its uncontestable Spikes to continue to dominate in both the builder and the match. The tier has extremely little backbone to make any bring feel consistent and there is realistically little diversity in play. I think PU is a much better tier, but still struggles with an unhealthy amount of paralysis, with probably 70% of teams fielding 2-4 forms of paralysis, which when coupled with Trapinch and lots of Substitute spam is overall a negative experience. As previously mentioned, the ADV DOU playerbase did not fare well after the recent ban to boom, but I have next to no experience in it or LC to comment.
I'm of the opinion these tiers should be left to their individuals and lower tier pl's to maintain a tournament scene. A mostly ADV OU tournament would improve both the quality of the tiers being played and the activity between the players, as my teammates (reasonably) would have virtually zero reason to look at my ADV NU/PU channels.
I know this is probably controversial to the lower tier players, I would feel bad if my tier got axed as well, but the reality is that there is still the lower tier forum tournaments to play them in, and I have similar issues for the vast majority of lower tiers I play in other generations, I will bring up this conversation again when BWPL rolls around.
Edit: I've been told by the very experienced player, SuperEpicAmpharos, that ADV Ubers also sucks shit too, so axe that one as well. idk anything about uu either tho but fruhdazi told me it sucks so whatever
My bad.the last thing adv draft needs rn is smogon touching it.
do you know what words meanthere is no burden to maintain a status quo
Me personally I don't like having to fight with other tiers for inclusion, I think it should just be power to the people that want to vouch for their tier instead of putting others down for it because of arbitrary perception bias in the case of this post:
This being said, I want to vouch for an 8 x 12 format with these tiers:
ADV OU x 4
ADV OU Bo3 x1
ADV Ubers x 1
ADV UU x 1
ADV RU x1
ADV NU (Glalieless) x1
ADV PU x 1
ADV ZU x 1
ADV LC x 1
This helps in two areas. 1. It increases the amount of OU slots and with the exponential playerbase increase ADV OU has had over the past few years is especially helpful here. 2. It gives a lot of ADV lower tiers some representation and doesn't mean we need to have any "RU or ZU" debates. ADV is one of the single most played old gens and I think having a significantly large player pool is warranted, these slots can all be filled without trouble imo.
Now comes the part where, as an ADV RU TL, I vouch for ADV RU. The tier has seen a FAR substantial amount of growth from last year, and is more heavily integrated into RU tours like RUGL, RUWC, RUBD, heck even today the proposed RUPL (RUPL!!!!!) format had ADV RU in it, and there's talk of its inclusion into RU Classic. I can't stress enough how its inclusion into ADVPL would be nothing short of beneficial to the tour, it is an incredibly unique and well-regarded ADV lower tier that has more active development than even some established lower tiers and has a playerbase that will want to play it including myself.
Re: ADV DOU, echoing most players thoughts in the thread about it. That's all I wanna say on the matter.
There's a ton of tours that are just ADV OU, including new ones like ADV wcop.
yea nah I'm a horrendous host :100 emoji:View attachment 711711
4 ou slots is good I feel. Every team drafts like 2+ ou subs and we kinda hit the end of the "viable" pool, if that means anything. This tour is not mushi league and mushi league does exist if you're a new player who wants to play a teamtour. 5 could be ok if we want to remove a lowtier and keep 10 slots - 10 slots is ideal but let's not do 6x ou to get there.
Nuke ou bo3. This is a team tour! Some people want to play it I guess so it's ok in one slot, but from a team lineup perspective it creates a weird incentive to have one slot as bo3 and others as bo1. Not a huge issue because this tour is pretty much just for fun anyway, but the correct thing to is all bo1.
If your tier is too high-variance to be included then making it bo3 doesn't fix that issue. If doubles is included it should be forced one way or another, too; the way it was last year was just ridiculous. At minimum the default should be bo3, which almost all players prefer, so you don't get an annoying situation where one player gets to hold all of their opponents hostage. Players preferring bo3 because each game lasts 5 turns is one thing but you just need to watch last year's games to get the impression that bo3 vs bo1 doesn't really reduce the variance all that much. Aside from that I don't really care about which low tiers get in or in what state.
You make up for it as a manageryea nah I'm a horrendous host :100 emoji:
Thought I was one and done in this thread but Glue may have made the best suggestion I have ever seen in one of these threads.
ADV draft is a huge community and they really do not overlap with the other tiers. Emerald Open is one of the biggest ADV tours every year and I think the ADV draft community is great and we would be doing a disservice to this tour by not incorporating them into it. I also think the draft community as a whole is awesome and it would be nice if ADV were the first tier to accept them into these types of tours. We can figure out the logistics if it happens, but I honestly believe the number 1 non-ou tier that should be in this tour is draft.