But this isn't actually a vote regarding tiering. The vote is biased, sure, but it's not a binding statement about banning anything.
I don't really see why people consider testing a waste of time. The claim seems to be that if a test doesn't change anything, it was a waste of time. Very little could be further from the truth. When someone asks why Deoxys-S is Uber, we have a couple of days of evidence. If the initial doubles test changes nothing, we still have the evidence as to why the entire Uber list is there. I think even doing it for the lulz, just to see what happens, is totally worth it. We don't have to be all political about this.
Then again, if a short test is conducted on a single object, that would be rather counterproductive to the point of testing, wouldn't it?
Actually, I could have posted this in any competitive discussion forum at all and have it make some sense.