if you are having volcarona problems, an endeavour sash mamoswine makes a great backup check to things like volcarona, cm reuniclus and smashpassteams, it is very effective, a set of stealth rock, endeavour, ice shard and eq
Also that froslass set you use could utilise some spikes to good effect, also relying on snow cloak and sub hax isnt a very good plan to win battles
also kefka tone down your ego a little bit, it makes reading this thread rather less informative and interesting than it could be when you reply to almost every single post with a weak counterargument
No offense, but Endeavor Sash Mamoswine seems pretty bad. Spinning isn't easy and a single layer of...anything, and Mamoswine's Sash becomes useless and he can no longer check those important threats.
I tried Spikes, but I prefer Taunt to stop more hazards, Roar, etc. and if Garchomp can hax his way to victory, so can Froslass especially since I've seen it happen so many times already.
My ego? Well, lets see.
Tehy started saying quite a few things about Hail. I replied with what things Hail could do in response and how Abomasnow isn't dead weight.
I said Alakazam can somewhat check Volcarona if necessary. Xephyr replied saying it can't check it. I replied back telling him what I believe was a check.
He replied:
If Alakazam is your only "answer" to Volcarona (even though it's about as bad of a check as I could imagine) then your team has some issues that need fixed.
I was just defending what I said. Alakazam, by definition of a check,
can check Volcarona. Karpman just said the exact same thing as Xephyr, but in a more...constructive(Right word for this?) manner as he also supplied some pokemon that be used in more offensive Hail. He was being more of a part to the thread(No offense, Xephyr, but come on...) instead of just posting to criticize a random sentence.
I don't see them as "weak counter arguments" when I really haven't seen them refuted yet. I also don't see how the problem is my ego as I'm just defending my opinion on a certain pokemon, which I believe is just part of a discussion.
- Something is posted by user1849
- User33653 posts a refutation to the above
- user1849 defends his opinion/set/etc.
- Discussion continues