-
The moderators of this forum are the Pokémon Showdown! Administrators.
-
Welcome to Smogon! Take a moment to read the Introduction to Smogon for a run-down on everything Smogon, and make sure you take some time to read the global rules.
Bug Reports v3 [READ ORIGINAL POST before posting]
- Thread starter Marty
- Start date
- Status
Two simple bugs this time:
1. When a pokemon with Ripen eats a berry, the sw/sh games show the “[pokemon]’s Ripen” thing. PS doesn’t show that.
2.When a pokemon gets hurt by a rocky helmet because they used Brutal Swing (the only contact move that hits multiple pokemon), the message displayed is “[pokemon] was hurt by the rocky helmet!” As this does not specify which pokemon was holding the rocky helmet, the summary windows of the enemy pokemon should only say something like “MIGHT have Rocky Helmet” until the item is revealed through other means. Instead, looking at the summary windows will reveal which pokemon was holding the rocky helmet, which could prove problematic in competitive play.
1. When a pokemon with Ripen eats a berry, the sw/sh games show the “[pokemon]’s Ripen” thing. PS doesn’t show that.
2.When a pokemon gets hurt by a rocky helmet because they used Brutal Swing (the only contact move that hits multiple pokemon), the message displayed is “[pokemon] was hurt by the rocky helmet!” As this does not specify which pokemon was holding the rocky helmet, the summary windows of the enemy pokemon should only say something like “MIGHT have Rocky Helmet” until the item is revealed through other means. Instead, looking at the summary windows will reveal which pokemon was holding the rocky helmet, which could prove problematic in competitive play.
I have another one now, which stopped me from using a funny gimmick strat.
Malamar’s eject PACK(not eject BUTTON) should have triggered on turn 1 of this battle because its attack was lowered:
https://replay.pokemonshowdown.com/gen8doublesou-1053664009
My only theory as to why this happened is because the server treated the action of eating the liechi berry as something that always increases stats, so it overlooked a check to trigger the eject pack.
Malamar’s eject PACK(not eject BUTTON) should have triggered on turn 1 of this battle because its attack was lowered:
https://replay.pokemonshowdown.com/gen8doublesou-1053664009
My only theory as to why this happened is because the server treated the action of eating the liechi berry as something that always increases stats, so it overlooked a check to trigger the eject pack.
Psychic terrain seems to work incorrectly and correctly in the same battle:
https://replay.pokemonshowdown.com/gen8vgc2020-1053668606
Turn 4, ESpeed goes through Psychic Terrain. Turn 6, it doesn't. Are the mechanics of Psychic Terrain more nuanced than "no priority works"?
https://replay.pokemonshowdown.com/gen8vgc2020-1053668606
Turn 4, ESpeed goes through Psychic Terrain. Turn 6, it doesn't. Are the mechanics of Psychic Terrain more nuanced than "no priority works"?
Only grounded pokemon can be protected by terrain. Braviary is flying type so it could be hit.
The move copycat does not function properly with max guard. In the first turn of the replay Riolu should have used trick room. https://replay.pokemonshowdown.com/gen8vgc2020-1053852610
Dear friends,
I will support this report, but not only with Max Guard, but other Max moves.
This movie can be the evidence.
In movie, Riolu copied the move Trickroom used as Max Guard.
This is my replay, my Chandeura used Trickroom as Max Guard.
https://replay.pokemonshowdown.com/gen8battlestadiumdoubles-1054059710
Kind Regards
Last edited:
https://replay.pokemonshowdown.com/gen8vgc2020-1054085018
I believe that when a fairy type uses follow me, both dragon darts should go into the fairy type mon rather than going to the partner. Hope this can get fixed! Thank you
I believe that when a fairy type uses follow me, both dragon darts should go into the fairy type mon rather than going to the partner. Hope this can get fixed! Thank you
I have a pull request open with this patch, not sure when it will be implemented due to other things still needing to be fixed for dragon darts.
You can’t change the base form of gmax alcremie in the teambuilder. (so all gmax alcremies are the default vanilla swirl w/ strawberry) Though this MOSTLY isn’t a huge issue, it means that any non-strawberry vanilla alcremie will give away the fact that it cannot gmax.
I’m kinda surprised that no one else reported this bug. It seems so obvious.
I’m kinda surprised that no one else reported this bug. It seems so obvious.
That's intentional. The only Alcremie form in max raid battles that can have the gmax factor is the form you mention.
The recent promotional raid events have released gigantamax for every Alcremie form (not topping). I assume flavour is what 2nd_slash meant by the max spoiler since you can't choose topping on PS yet.
LGPE has two issues right now:
- Teambuilder presents you with Gen 7's tier list instead of LGPEs
- Stats are entirely incorrect right now
Not entirely sure what's going on with the stats, but my first guess would be that the client simply doesn't use LGPE's teambuilder data anymore and that the Friendship stat boosts no longer apply. Both of these issues are quite significant ones that affect the playability of the tier.
- Teambuilder presents you with Gen 7's tier list instead of LGPEs
- Stats are entirely incorrect right now
What the teambuilder shows:
What the battle has:
What both should show:
(taken from old footage)
What the battle has:
What both should show:
Not entirely sure what's going on with the stats, but my first guess would be that the client simply doesn't use LGPE's teambuilder data anymore and that the Friendship stat boosts no longer apply. Both of these issues are quite significant ones that affect the playability of the tier.
Was told to post this bug here by the mods over at the help forum on showdown.
Red Card and Destiny Bond glitch in doubles:
https://replay.pokemonshowdown.com/gen8doublesuu-1055251798
Red Card and Destiny Bond glitch in doubles:
https://replay.pokemonshowdown.com/gen8doublesuu-1055251798
I keep unintentionally finding all these bugs. Probably gonna find another one within the next week...
Anyway, this one’s more silly than problematic. The ev spread suggester gets very confused when it sees both a move that suggests speed should be minimized and a move that suggests it should be maximized, as shown in the screenshot below.
A more in-depth analysis of this bug: The systemsuggested to give my shuckle 252 speed ivs (because I had shell smash) but then also gave it a -spe nature and 0 spe ivs. What’s so silly about this is that the speed value this results in can be achieved while by using much less evs and lowering a different stat with the nature. To fix this, I would suggest to make the ev suggester check if it’s contradicting itself with its suggestions, and if so, choose one to override the other rather than do some weird combination of the two.
Anyway, this one’s more silly than problematic. The ev spread suggester gets very confused when it sees both a move that suggests speed should be minimized and a move that suggests it should be maximized, as shown in the screenshot below.
A more in-depth analysis of this bug: The systemsuggested to give my shuckle 252 speed ivs (because I had shell smash) but then also gave it a -spe nature and 0 spe ivs. What’s so silly about this is that the speed value this results in can be achieved while by using much less evs and lowering a different stat with the nature. To fix this, I would suggest to make the ev suggester check if it’s contradicting itself with its suggestions, and if so, choose one to override the other rather than do some weird combination of the two.
Attachments
https://replay.pokemonshowdown.com/gen8doublescustomgame-1056007276
Lightningrod draws in a failed Aura Wheel but doesn't boost off it which seemed weird. Also all the Scizor have lightningrod but only one activated it only twice.
Lightningrod draws in a failed Aura Wheel but doesn't boost off it which seemed weird. Also all the Scizor have lightningrod but only one activated it only twice.
Well, now there's a special Milcery raid with the possibility of evolving into a Gigantamax Alcremie, so there is no Max Spoiler anymore.
https://replay.pokemonshowdown.com/gen8challengecup1v1-1056289825
Eevee-Starter has no moveset in Gen 8 Challenge Cup 1v1. This has happened multiple times, but this is the most recent time I got it in a battle.
Eevee-Starter has no moveset in Gen 8 Challenge Cup 1v1. This has happened multiple times, but this is the most recent time I got it in a battle.
My hawlucha was intoxicated whilst under misty terrain, since none of toxapex abilities nullifies it (not that anyone would ever use an ability other than regenerator) that only leaves space for a bug that allows status under misty's protection.
Only grounded pokemon are protected, flying types are not.
If there are several Pokémon with the ability Lightning Rod (or Storm Drain, for water-type attacks), then the earliest sent out (in this case, either the first sent out, or if that one is attacking, then the second sent out) is the one that takes priority. However, if they were the intended target anyway, then the ability does not activate.
The custap berry is unreleased?
IN NATIONAL DEX!?!??
Isn’t the whole point of nat dex is that you can use all the items & pokemon that were removed? (In this case, the item is in the game data but unavailable as of now, BUT YOU CAN GET IT IN SUN/MOON.)
By that logic, all the mega stones & z-crystals would be “unreleased”.
Seriously, this makes no sense and should be fixed.
Note: I was in a crabby mood when I wrote this. Please excuse my rudeness.
IN NATIONAL DEX!?!??
Isn’t the whole point of nat dex is that you can use all the items & pokemon that were removed? (In this case, the item is in the game data but unavailable as of now, BUT YOU CAN GET IT IN SUN/MOON.)
By that logic, all the mega stones & z-crystals would be “unreleased”.
Seriously, this makes no sense and should be fixed.
Note: I was in a crabby mood when I wrote this. Please excuse my rudeness.
Attachments
Found a validation error in moves being unable to be learned. It says for my opponent that Eternatus can't learn Eternabeam. Is this a validation error?
- Status