-
Check out the relaunch of our general collection, with classic designs and new ones by our very own Pissog!
-
Welcome to Smogon! Take a moment to read the Introduction to Smogon for a run-down on everything Smogon, and make sure you take some time to read the global rules.
butts and breasts
- Thread starter blarajan
- Start date
- Status
There's some truth in that - rocket/traffic cone boobs just look unnatural. But don't all natural boobs have at least some sag in them? I agree mostly with your second paragraph, can't say I agree on your final sentence though.
Good proportioned breast is the best
has everyone not learned by now that chou is hopelessly addicted to milk junkies and his opinion should just be left alone in whatever fanciful cleavage he holds dearly to his psyche at all times??
i haven't voted yet, but it will probably be legs. a woman's breast size is not something she can control (naturally) so i don't really see that as something to ever be impressed with. working out your upper body can make your breasts perkier, but i think "perfect" breasts are ones that are proportionate to the rest of your frame.
i'm kind of obsessed with butts, and simple exercise can take an average butt to a pretty great butt. i love spanking butts. BUTTS
flat stomaches are beyond sexy. if you have a flat tummy and defined abs, someone better be giving it some attention. that goes for both guys and girls.
and last but certainly not least, legs. great legs are like the red carpet to the rest of the body, which will probably be pretty all right if a girl takes the time to exercise and shape her legs. good legs will most likely lead to a perky and round butt, which could also lead to the middle of the hourglass in a flat and toned stomach. if all that is good, breasts are negligible at this point, but i'm sure they're going to look great too no matter what size.
hint: a woman who exercises and takes care of her body is the most attractive thing.
i haven't voted yet, but it will probably be legs. a woman's breast size is not something she can control (naturally) so i don't really see that as something to ever be impressed with. working out your upper body can make your breasts perkier, but i think "perfect" breasts are ones that are proportionate to the rest of your frame.
i'm kind of obsessed with butts, and simple exercise can take an average butt to a pretty great butt. i love spanking butts. BUTTS
flat stomaches are beyond sexy. if you have a flat tummy and defined abs, someone better be giving it some attention. that goes for both guys and girls.
and last but certainly not least, legs. great legs are like the red carpet to the rest of the body, which will probably be pretty all right if a girl takes the time to exercise and shape her legs. good legs will most likely lead to a perky and round butt, which could also lead to the middle of the hourglass in a flat and toned stomach. if all that is good, breasts are negligible at this point, but i'm sure they're going to look great too no matter what size.
hint: a woman who exercises and takes care of her body is the most attractive thing.
@Fishy-- You know me too well :|
On another note-- being able to control/not control a personal aspect seems a weird factor to consider when it comes to attraction. I mean, at the base level, attraction is all about reproduction, which is all about picking a mate with the right genes-- you know, that genetic material that decides so much about who we are, with us having zero ability to change them. You could say that, despite what fashion/makeup/culture does, attraction's base purpose is to be solely about picking out attributes the other party has no ability to control. Am I wrong? O.o
Now if we're talking about picking a mate/spouse/life partner (pick your favorite phrase), than being able to work together is most important and compatibility beyond mere physical attraction is supremely important... but I don't think that's what the OP wanted to talk about.
I hope my gfriend ain't stalking b/c I'm about to say her tits don't fall perfectly in line with my tastes, but she's a rare example of 34 D's boobs that don't hang/sag at all-- those things stand to attention all natural. They're nice and rounded, so not "cone" shaped, but so firm for natural boobs-- I would personally prefer a little more hang (maybe if I just wait it out??? But she's already 27-- how many years before "age sagage" kicks in??).
Maybe I should shut up and just be satisfied that my asian girlfriend has boobs that I consider boobs (love 'em-- I'll wait any number of decades to see the hanging I desire, lol).
On another note-- being able to control/not control a personal aspect seems a weird factor to consider when it comes to attraction. I mean, at the base level, attraction is all about reproduction, which is all about picking a mate with the right genes-- you know, that genetic material that decides so much about who we are, with us having zero ability to change them. You could say that, despite what fashion/makeup/culture does, attraction's base purpose is to be solely about picking out attributes the other party has no ability to control. Am I wrong? O.o
Now if we're talking about picking a mate/spouse/life partner (pick your favorite phrase), than being able to work together is most important and compatibility beyond mere physical attraction is supremely important... but I don't think that's what the OP wanted to talk about.
I hope my gfriend ain't stalking b/c I'm about to say her tits don't fall perfectly in line with my tastes, but she's a rare example of 34 D's boobs that don't hang/sag at all-- those things stand to attention all natural. They're nice and rounded, so not "cone" shaped, but so firm for natural boobs-- I would personally prefer a little more hang (maybe if I just wait it out??? But she's already 27-- how many years before "age sagage" kicks in??).
Maybe I should shut up and just be satisfied that my asian girlfriend has boobs that I consider boobs (love 'em-- I'll wait any number of decades to see the hanging I desire, lol).
chou i would agree with your assessment if i weren't so evolved to the point that i can think and otherwise form opinions outside of my "base genetics" and i really wish you'd stop generalizing the average person to merely act and think like a caveman when it comes to attraction in the opposite sex.
Well of course there's a lot more to attraction than mere physical attraction. I even said that personality traits, compatibility, (and in my opinion, life views, values, religious beliefs, ECONOMIC beliefs, EDUCATIONAL values), etc. are a lot more important when picking a significant other. This is where I think higher cognitive functions and the ability to think above base level come into play.
But this thread is about physical attraction. With physical attraction, aren't we still just dressed up cave men?
I still don't get why "factors someone can control" should be more important than "factors someone can't control" in terms of physical attraction. Makeup, dress, scent, body language, and level of fitness are things we have more or less ability to control in altering our physical attractiveness. Yes, these factors do play a huge role in physical attraction, but I don't see why I (or anyone) should be obligated to find them more or less important than non-controllable factors.
To me, I could care less if a pair of legs are long or stubby as long as they fall into the average range of healthy human body proportions and have a reasonable degree of tone ('could care less about a little bit of fat/celulite). A little tummy never hurt either-- nature made women to have a bit of fat.
Fuck, if anything I'd expect most women to be appreciative of the fact that I don't buy into the media-induced tincy-wincy woman model, and have very little discrimination based on age.
In any case, in physical attraction, I don't think there's such thing as obligation-- it's something outside any moral scope because: it's something you can't control (which does come into play with ethics). If you don't expect homosexual guys to stop loving other men, how could you put any moral weight on me to not be affixiated on boobs?
But this thread is about physical attraction. With physical attraction, aren't we still just dressed up cave men?
I still don't get why "factors someone can control" should be more important than "factors someone can't control" in terms of physical attraction. Makeup, dress, scent, body language, and level of fitness are things we have more or less ability to control in altering our physical attractiveness. Yes, these factors do play a huge role in physical attraction, but I don't see why I (or anyone) should be obligated to find them more or less important than non-controllable factors.
To me, I could care less if a pair of legs are long or stubby as long as they fall into the average range of healthy human body proportions and have a reasonable degree of tone ('could care less about a little bit of fat/celulite). A little tummy never hurt either-- nature made women to have a bit of fat.
Fuck, if anything I'd expect most women to be appreciative of the fact that I don't buy into the media-induced tincy-wincy woman model, and have very little discrimination based on age.
In any case, in physical attraction, I don't think there's such thing as obligation-- it's something outside any moral scope because: it's something you can't control (which does come into play with ethics). If you don't expect homosexual guys to stop loving other men, how could you put any moral weight on me to not be affixiated on boobs?
quit hatin on the guy for appreciating a good boob
i am so glad the stomach is getting more love compared to earlier on in this thread.
ugh, also reading your comment made me miss my abs. I'm working hard at the gym, but seeing as i am currently bulking (and loving the size i have gained so far. gone up 1 shirt size and the current shirts i moved up to are beginning to get tight.), it doesnt help me in that area. although the muscle i am putting on is great, i am paying the price at my mid section. i can only now see the outline of my abs ./sadface
cant wait for spring/summer when i get them back. In the end though i will be paying full attention to her (whomever she may be) so i dont worry about it too much
Edit: also nobody is currently giving it some attention :(. i should just take someone seriously and enter into a relationship.......nah
Edit 2: A younger Mariah Carey had one of the sexiest midsections ever
damn, that woman is just my fantasy and still my only celeb crush after all these years (all throughout my teen years). so damn sexy i would drop all my relationship insecurities and just go straight to marriage.
are 'bullet train breasts' a japanese convention because that is the only country's pop culture wherein i have seen this phrase being used
Actually, it is in our genetics to be attracted to certain traits. Sure, there are factors that affect it as well while you age, but it certainly is in our genetics to be attracted to certain figures/ratios etc.
Fishy, I'll agree that I took one line of your post and we've ran a long way with it.
I will say that if you'll go back to the initial posts, you'll find mine:
While your response:
However, I did intend for discourse that was merely intellectual, and not at all personal. I will stand by even my longer post abiding to this sentiment.
Anyway, attraction is a very complicated behavior based heavily on both nature and nurture, as you have said. I merely wished to explore the fact that I find it strange to consider whether a physical trait is controllable or not in its value. If you are going to conclude that there is no right or wrong and that it is completely individual (as I would have thought from the start), then there is not much more to say on the subject.
I will say that if you'll go back to the initial posts, you'll find mine:
Has a tone of curious inquisition. I merely wished to invite you to engage in an intellectual exploration of a difference of opinion that I found peculiar/surprising.
While your response:
Does contain value statements that could be read as condescending. I'll admit I am at fault or taking the bait more than I should have.
However, I did intend for discourse that was merely intellectual, and not at all personal. I will stand by even my longer post abiding to this sentiment.
Anyway, attraction is a very complicated behavior based heavily on both nature and nurture, as you have said. I merely wished to explore the fact that I find it strange to consider whether a physical trait is controllable or not in its value. If you are going to conclude that there is no right or wrong and that it is completely individual (as I would have thought from the start), then there is not much more to say on the subject.
honestly i was just really upset about your previous slight toward smaller breasts, but hopefully you can word your opinions in a more positive nature without backing them with negatives against what is contrary to your opinion. tastes are individual indeed, i just found it distasteful to insult that which you're not personally attracted to.
and heroes, that can be said for all people to some extent, but those figures/ratios still vary from person to person. i just really, really hate sweeping generalizations concerning aesthetics, when in the end beauty is truly in the eye of the beholder!!
and heroes, that can be said for all people to some extent, but those figures/ratios still vary from person to person. i just really, really hate sweeping generalizations concerning aesthetics, when in the end beauty is truly in the eye of the beholder!!
butt lesbian here
all of the curves
for the most part, larger breasts are biologically more attractive than smaller breasts in the sense that they are perceived as having greater fertility by males
blatantly insecure about her breasts but i agree with everything she said and omg that burn about penis enlargement jesus christ lol said:
this! jessica ennis is like my dream girl
at first we'll be rivals but our shared love of competition will bring us together and before long we'll be doing sit ups together and having long meaningful conversations about calories and interval training and our children will be strong and beautiful, the whole thing is going to be just swell i can't wait
Lee Galton?
seriously? shoulders? thats got to be the absolute LAST thing i care about. except elbows. i dont care about those at all. unless they are really gross and scabby or moldy.
- Status