thank you for doing what everyone else wanted to do but couldnt be botheredrebuttal
thank you for doing what everyone else wanted to do but couldnt be botheredrebuttal
If this election has achieved only one thing, it is to show how deeply racism, bigotry, and xenophobia are rooted in the United States and how divisive these elements are. Please do not further poison this thread with your ignorance and bitterness.
I would disagree with this statement. Sure tear his argument to shreds, but I feel that this election has been a very positive one for the USA. It has shown that racism, bigotry and Xenophobia are no where near as wide spread as they used to be. It also shows many many people that the colour of your skin does not matter any more, and not only are black people today accepted in society 63% (poll) feel completely comfortable with Barack Obama as president. It has been an experience that America would have to go through some day, and i think you came out of it very well. The one thing that I heard more today than anything else (In England by the way) was "I'm glad America didn't fuck up this time." Which shows how political attitudes towards america may also be changing.
On an alternative note, what makes people think McCain would keep the country safer than Obama. At the end of the day they will have similar advisors, McCain was in the Army 5 of those years kept in a prison of war camp. Sure he can conduct a battle, but what does that have to do with international foreign policy?
As my good friend living in Boston said: "I like not paying taxes but I like having roads and police and firefighters more."DM said:MA Question 1 failed - really? 70% had the option to lessen and then repeal their own state tax... and voted NO???
As my good friend living in Boston said: "I like not paying taxes but I like having roads and police and firefighters more."
You mean it doesn't matter to you how money is spent? The fact alone that money is being spent means that the policies are no different?
Surgo said:As my good friend living in Boston said: "I like not paying taxes but I like having roads and police and firefighters more."
First of all, congratulations Obama - good luck running our country.
My main point I want to make:
For the past few weeks, when I walked into school, there was always some person wearing an Obama/Biden shirt. Now, this is in no way racist, but each day, that person was African American. Now, this could've been considered a coincidence, but every day? Doubtful.
Then, election day passed, and today when I went to school, all those same people were celebrating and shouting Obama's name. Now I find nothing wrong with this, but here's the thing:
People are saying that Obama will turn America into a socialist country. I'm not going to agree or disagree, because I'm probably not educated enough on his policy, but the one thing I have to say is this: If Obama fixes our country and we become the great country we used to be, then Kudos to him. But if he ends up turning our country into a socialist crap-country, then I'm going to say "I told you so" to all the people who were voting because of race. That may be extremely cynical of me, but that's just who I am.
Also, quoting Stephen Colbert from last night's "Indecision 2008" program:
"It's no surprise that Obama won New York. New York would never vote for John McCain. The City That Never Sleeps doesn't mix well with a man who goes to bed at 7:30 PM."
People are saying that Obama will turn America into a socialist country.
here is my question, and it is a simple one.
What the hell do you people want?
All of you republicans are like "Oh man, they are going to take our shit!", but you want better health care. As the old saying goes, You cannot have your cake and eat it too.
The problem with health care is not money; it is the way it is administered. We spend more money on it than anyone else in the world. Some think universal health care is the solution (of course, it's been tried in several states and has been a universal...failure), some think "free market" health care is the solution (except it won't actually be free market)
We spend a lot of money on stuff...but just like everything else the government does, most of it is wasted.
All those arguments going on how Obama is on the left is fucking retarded. First of all, it's not spread the wealth. It's everyone put some money in the fucking pot so we can run the country better. Or do you prefer to pay for everything yourself? Every time you go to a hospital, every time you go to the police?
This is hyperbole. Nobody is advocating that people pay for police services. But what people on the Right advocate is that as much be left to the (so much more efficient it's ridiculous) private sector as possible, and let government provide only those the private sector can't or would have difficulty providing - defense, infrastructure, public safety and so forth.
Oh wait! Most Americans can't keep their jobs cause greedy fat pig corporations are doing this neat little thing called outsourcing! Fuck the whole management, we can just pay 0.25 a day to people half way across the world!
don't we still have less unemployment than everyone else in the world? Outsourcing is not as easy as it makes you sound, and it's not like there aren't costs in goodwill and so forth.
And also, are you content with those people in third world countries remaining poor rather than getting at least some sort of employment? (.25 a day is mostly hyperbole btw but even if it weren't, 25 cents a day > 0 cents a day. We can't wave a magic wand and increase Third World wages by 100x.)
God, some of you people are too retarded to look at the big picture. I would even say that Americans are so behind in social changes that it is just sad
the fervor with you "progressives" trumpet the morality of your "social changes" sounds i dare say...evangelical? :) People disagree on what is acceptable and what is not. But you denounce people who disagree as "bigots", backward, and so forth.
Urban Legend alert!Ancien Regime said:Some think universal health care is the solution (of course, it's been tried in several states and has been a universal...failure)
I agree with you; it's imperfect for sure, but "universal failure" is far too simplistic. Here are some facts from an article I read:Because I'm looking at Canada and France and certainly not getting a failure vibe in the least.
The United States is the only developed nation without universal health care. Although health insurance systems worldwide are straining as populations age, safety nets have largely remained in place. Here are brief descriptions of insurance systems of several nations..
France
Health care as percentage of GDP: 9.6
Health expenditure per person: $2,567
Universal care funded through mandatory health insurance provided by Social Security, with private supplemental coverage filling gaps..
Germany
Health care as percentage of GDP: 10.8
Health expenditure per person: $2,820
All individuals are enrolled in government-approved health insurance plans partly financed by employer and employee contributions, although high- income workers may buy private insurance instead..
Japan
Health care as percentage of GDP: 8
Health expenditure per person: $2,131
A dual system in which workers enroll in insurance programs through their jobs, while all others join Japan's national health insurance plan..
United Kingdom
Health care as percentage of GDP: 7.6
Health expenditure per person: $1,989
A publicly funded National Health Service provides free care, with the option of private insurance for those wanting treatment outside the state system..
United States
Health care as percentage of GDP: 13.9
Health expenditure per person: $4,887
Federal and state governments pay most of the cost of care for seniors and the poor, with employer or individually financed insurance available for others. About 45 million people lack coverage.
Urban Legend alert!
Where has universal healthcare been a failure, exactly? Do you have evidence for this, or is it simply anecdotal? Because I'm looking at Canada and France and certainly not getting a failure vibe in the least.
On this point in particular with Canadian health care:Ancien Regime said:Wait times are still a problem though.
On this point in particular with Canadian health care:
Wait times appear to be a problem because of a certain bad policy as much as anything else. There is something of a flood of perfectly legitimate doctors who have immigrated to Canada from India, with perfectly legitimate medical degrees, who want to practice medicine in Canada, but are seriously being barred from doing so. As far as I can tell, this reason is solely bureaucratic and fear-based, and not borne out of any legitimate concern with the quality of their education.
Perhaps some Canadian smogoners can chime in here.