ah, the hyomin
-
Welcome to Smogon! Take a moment to read the Introduction to Smogon for a run-down on everything Smogon, and make sure you take some time to read the global rules.
-
Congrats to the winners of the 2023 Smog Awards!
KPOP
- Thread starter rubixlx0
- Start date
ps here are the benefits of having an extremely low bodyfat%
OH GOD YES@HYOMIN
You have no idea what you're talking about do you...whatever you're smoking, could I have some?
Bonerlicious.ps here are the benefits of having an extremely low bodyfat%
1. No... how is "making" or "creating" music performing it? When a professional such as Dr. Dre. makes music, he creates his own beats and rhythms, not "performing" it.
Also, I never said not writing their music is a problem. Kpop fanboys and fangirls use their "singing" and "musical talent" as evidence of their so called musical talent, which is complete and utter bullshit, as they are great performers and dancers, and not musicians.
2. All genres to some extent rehash and take the same chords and beats if you look closely enough. (John Lennon is a particular example that I remember, as a friend did a mathematical paper on his music and found he pretty much rehashes a lot of famous stuff), but the point is, Kpop does it to the point where almost each goddamn song is a continual rehash of the same beats and chord progression, and there's almost no room for creativity in the industry. Their industry focuses on attracting the target audience with catchy beats and lyrics and flashiness with their performances. How do you have musical "talents" and have any sort of advances in the industry when they use the goddamn same thing over and over.
1. The majority of most artists do compose their music to an extent. Most of them work with producers and many of them have lyrical abilities. However, most* (there are a few exceptions) in the Kpop industry who sing what they're given to them and solely act as performers. Their singing abilities, while intact, are mediocre, and are enhanced by various techniques (duh). I would hesitate in calling them true artists in that regard, but again, call them performers (which they do a damn good job at).
2. As addressed above, the Kpop industry does it so that there's actual no growth in the industry lyrically. Of course, many of the non mainstream songs that fly under the radar do have an element of creativity in it, but as a whole, the industry focuses on catching its target audience with catchiness, not creativity.
3. Fuck. No. They. Are. Not. As a musician myself, I definitely do not call them artists in any form. They. Are. Performers.
i think that was hipmonlee's point, although i disagree
Omg, r u serious? u r soooooo stewpid. big bang r like 2wice the group 2n31 r!!!!!!!! jus shtup!!!!! omg!!!!!!
Am I doing it right.
Also I admittedly like this song...HUZZAH!!!!!
Ok fuck you guys I'm starting to enjoy this a little too much.
Am I doing it right.
Also I admittedly like this song...HUZZAH!!!!!
Ok fuck you guys I'm starting to enjoy this a little too much.
you cannot accurately emulate a youtube comment
they are too awful
they are too awful
well at least no one is blatantly bashing the genre
this is actually true.. we made several attempts at it the other day and couldn't quite get it right :x
oh t-ara i love you
also next week:
apparently the title track will be both english and korean!! i don't mind tho since SNSD have better english than other groups
basically,
brown eyed girls
(courtesy of jumpluff)
Fishy
tits McGee (๑˃̵ᴗ˂̵)
still listening to that 8-bit kpop piece, it's amazingly pretty and cute. tiny asian video game :3
i feel like jpop/kpop are primarily focused on the image, and more so the videography they end up doing for music videos rather than the success/popularity of the actual music track. this is fairly obvious from how well done their videos are with the music, iT JUST LOOKS SO GOOD. but, not to deny that the creation of the music itself isn't a well-executed plan to be perfectly cohesive with everything else, since that's completely true. i think kpop especially exists to make catchy/cutesy/korean sounding music just to produce the songs with aesthetically sculpted and lovely korean girls and fantastic videos, all tied together with stupidly/satisfyingly catchy music. the trifECTa
ps. there was a week or so long period where I listened to GEE obsessively, especially when I was driving to school. gee gee gee gee BABY BABY BABY~
i feel like jpop/kpop are primarily focused on the image, and more so the videography they end up doing for music videos rather than the success/popularity of the actual music track. this is fairly obvious from how well done their videos are with the music, iT JUST LOOKS SO GOOD. but, not to deny that the creation of the music itself isn't a well-executed plan to be perfectly cohesive with everything else, since that's completely true. i think kpop especially exists to make catchy/cutesy/korean sounding music just to produce the songs with aesthetically sculpted and lovely korean girls and fantastic videos, all tied together with stupidly/satisfyingly catchy music. the trifECTa
ps. there was a week or so long period where I listened to GEE obsessively, especially when I was driving to school. gee gee gee gee BABY BABY BABY~
if you like 11 year old white boys then yes they are.
Now THAT I can get behind (literally)