• Check out the relaunch of our general collection, with classic designs and new ones by our very own Pissog!

LC LC Fall Seasonal IX - Round 7 (Losers)

Merritt

Merritt

no comment
is a Tournament Directoris a Site Content Manageris a Member of Senior Staffis a Top Community Contributoris a Contributor to Smogonis a Top Dedicated Tournament Host
Head TD
K9KJPv1.png

artwork by Zephyr2007 ​
Rules:
  • Standard SV LC
  • Double Elimination
  • All rounds will be best of three, you may switch teams in between games
  • Any changes to the tier that occur in the middle of a round will not apply until the next round
  • You are expected to know and follow all general tournament rules
  • VMs are only thing that matters for activity. Use this guide to ensure you don't lose via activity or coinflip.
  • Substitutes will be slotted in as players drop out or in mass a few days into the round. If you are tagged due to being in danger of being subbed out you must either post in the thread or on either player's wall within 24 hours or risk being subbed out.
  • In order to encourage development of the Little Cup metagame and higher quality games, replays will be mandatory starting in Round 2 of the Winners bracket and Round 3 of the Losers bracket. If neither player posts replays, the match will be coin flipped.
This is part of the 2025 LC Circuit and will use the following point distribution. As a Type A tour, the points listed are the actual values. For more information on different tournament types and how they relate to circuit points, please read the LC Circuit thread.
ITO38Zr.png


Round 7
JuninxZ9  vs  rarre
vooper  vs  Laroxyl
Kingler  vs  LB
IsaiahMeep  vs  PoseidonWrath
MagicUse618  vs  GasaiYunoSan
Lightniong  vs  Corporate Donkey
Cow  vs  Always Edgy
ETJX  vs  Taka
GUZOT  vs  DKM
Calmmind75  vs  hybone
mmtaccos  vs  Mik3y
bleahey  vs  wssi
ambi_  vs  Origamies
Don Bork  vs  Wail Wailord
Eniigma  vs  hi.naming is hard
aditya1729  vs  Hoennseptile

Deadline: <t:1762747200:R>
Extension Deadline: <t:1762401600:R>
REPLAYS ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL GAMES
 
Last edited:
Eniigma said:
yea u need to confirm that u agree to it
not saying anything and then showing up isnt a confirmation to my schedule
Click to expand...

This is somewhat correct, and means that you can dispute it if hi.naming was trying to get activity, though hi.naming has a not totally unreasonable interpretation that the time was at least suggested to be set.

That said, this means that you two failed to find a time and neither of you have grounds for an activity win over the other (taking a full 4 days to begin scheduling, offering a single contrary time to your opponent's suggestion on your end, not initiating scheduling and taking over a day to respond to your offered time on hi.naming's end).

While normally I wouldn't give out what act decision will be made ahead of time, I'd like to know if giving an extension would be a waste of everyone's time and if I should flip it instead.

hi.naming is hard Eniigma
 
Merritt said:
This is somewhat correct, and means that you can dispute it if hi.naming was trying to get activity, though hi.naming has a not totally unreasonable interpretation that the time was at least suggested to be set.

That said, this means that you two failed to find a time and neither of you have grounds for an activity win over the other (taking a full 4 days to begin scheduling, offering a single contrary time to your opponent's suggestion on your end, not initiating scheduling and taking over a day to respond to your offered time on hi.naming's end).

While normally I wouldn't give out what act decision will be made ahead of time, I'd like to know if giving an extension would be a waste of everyone's time and if I should flip it instead.

hi.naming is hard Eniigma
Click to expand...
would prefer an extension as I have good availability over the next two days and would rather to lose than to flip; if coin flip is deemed more reasonable it's also fine
 
Merritt said:
This is somewhat correct, and means that you can dispute it if hi.naming was trying to get activity, though hi.naming has a not totally unreasonable interpretation that the time was at least suggested to be set.

That said, this means that you two failed to find a time and neither of you have grounds for an activity win over the other (taking a full 4 days to begin scheduling, offering a single contrary time to your opponent's suggestion on your end, not initiating scheduling and taking over a day to respond to your offered time on hi.naming's end).

While normally I wouldn't give out what act decision will be made ahead of time, I'd like to know if giving an extension would be a waste of everyone's time and if I should flip it instead.

hi.naming is hard Eniigma
Click to expand...
Extention then
 
Deadline has passed.

Activity:

JuninxZ9  vs  rarre
MagicUse618  vs  GasaiYunoSan
Lightniong  vs  Corporate Donkey
ambi_  vs  Origamies

Coinflip:
Screenshot 2025-11-10 060516.png

Don Bork  vs  Wail Wailord

Extension:
Eniigma  vs  hi.naming is hard

Extension deadline: <t:1763006400:R>

If you believe there's been a mistake, please let me know. The next round will go up now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top